• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PHARMO全科医生(GP)数据的完整性和代表性:与国家统计数据的比较。

Completeness and Representativeness of the PHARMO General Practitioner (GP) Data: A Comparison with National Statistics.

作者信息

Overbeek Jetty A, Swart Karin M A, Houben Eline, Penning-van Beest Fernie J A, Herings Ron M C

机构信息

Department Research, PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 5;15:1-11. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S389598. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S389598
PMID:36636730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9830053/
Abstract

PURPOSE

When using incomplete or non-representative real-world data (RWD), bias is more likely to occur. The aim of the current study was to assess the completeness and representativeness of the PHARMO GP data for the Dutch population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed. The PHARMO GP data comprise data from electronic health records registered by GPs. Data on the Dutch population were obtained from Statistics Netherlands (CBS), which offers publicly available data on several themes. The standardized difference (std.diff) was used to compare proportions between the PHARMO GP population and the Dutch population. An absolute std.diff >0.2 was considered a difference.

RESULTS

On January 1st, 2018, 3,466,321 persons were included in the PHARMO GP data (mean age: 41.6 years, 49.7% males). The sex and age distribution was similar to the Dutch population. The PHARMO GP data captured less not urbanized areas compared to the Dutch population (not urbanized areas: 9.4% vs 17.1% [std.diff: -0.23]). Regarding medication use, only the pharmacological subgroups "viral vaccines" and "hormonal contraceptives for systemic use" differed (std.diff >0.2); use in the GP data was more complete than in the Statistics Netherlands (CBS) data. No differences were observed regarding diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

The PHARMO GP data are representative of the Dutch population with regard to the demographic characteristics and diagnoses in primary care. Medication data in the PHARMO GP data are more complete than national statistics, and differences are related to reimbursement. Use of the data and interpretation of results based on these sources should be done with experts on the data sources, the Dutch healthcare system and (pharmaco)epidemiology.

摘要

目的

使用不完整或不具代表性的真实世界数据(RWD)时,更有可能出现偏差。本研究的目的是评估荷兰人群的PHARMO全科医生(GP)数据的完整性和代表性。

患者与方法

进行了一项横断面研究。PHARMO GP数据包括来自全科医生登记的电子健康记录的数据。荷兰人群的数据来自荷兰统计局(CBS),该局提供了多个主题的公开可用数据。使用标准化差异(std.diff)来比较PHARMO GP人群与荷兰人群之间的比例。绝对std.diff>0.2被视为有差异。

结果

2018年1月1日,PHARMO GP数据纳入了3,466,321人(平均年龄:41.6岁,男性占49.7%)。性别和年龄分布与荷兰人群相似。与荷兰人群相比,PHARMO GP数据涵盖的非城市化地区较少(非城市化地区:9.4%对17.1% [std.diff:-0.23])。在药物使用方面,只有“病毒疫苗”和“全身用激素避孕药”这两个药理学亚组存在差异(std.diff>0.2);全科医生数据中的使用情况比荷兰统计局(CBS)数据中的更完整。在诊断方面未观察到差异。

结论

PHARMO GP数据在初级保健的人口统计学特征和诊断方面代表了荷兰人群。PHARMO GP数据中的药物数据比国家统计数据更完整,差异与报销有关。基于这些来源的数据使用和结果解释应由数据来源、荷兰医疗保健系统和(药物)流行病学方面的专家进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/51774fa6494e/CLEP-15-1-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/b99bf9c91bfe/CLEP-15-1-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/7189bc601432/CLEP-15-1-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/e8eb9eb6c2cb/CLEP-15-1-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/867a63169676/CLEP-15-1-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/51774fa6494e/CLEP-15-1-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/b99bf9c91bfe/CLEP-15-1-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/7189bc601432/CLEP-15-1-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/e8eb9eb6c2cb/CLEP-15-1-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/867a63169676/CLEP-15-1-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/296d/9830053/51774fa6494e/CLEP-15-1-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Completeness and Representativeness of the PHARMO General Practitioner (GP) Data: A Comparison with National Statistics.PHARMO全科医生(GP)数据的完整性和代表性:与国家统计数据的比较。
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 5;15:1-11. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S389598. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessment of the Adjusted Clinical Groups system in Dutch primary care using electronic health records: a retrospective cross-sectional study.利用电子健康记录评估荷兰初级保健中的调整临床群组系统:一项回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06222-9.
3
A population-based linked cohort of cancer and primary care data: A new source to study the management of cancer in primary care.基于人群的癌症与初级保健数据关联队列:研究初级保健中癌症管理的新数据源。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13529. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13529. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
4
Antibiotics in Dutch general practice: nationwide electronic GP database and national reimbursement rates.荷兰全科医疗中的抗生素:全国性电子全科医生数据库与国家报销率
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Apr;17(4):378-83. doi: 10.1002/pds.1501.
5
Existing Data Sources for Clinical Epidemiology: The PHARMO Database Network.临床流行病学的现有数据来源:PHARMO数据库网络。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 29;12:415-422. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S247575. eCollection 2020.
6
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
7
The Prospective Dutch Colorectal Cancer (PLCRC) cohort: real-world data facilitating research and clinical care.前瞻性荷兰结直肠癌(PLCRC)队列:真实世界数据促进研究和临床护理。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79890-y.
8
Comparison of depression care provided in general practice in Norway and the Netherlands: registry-based cohort study (The Norwegian GP-DEP study).挪威和荷兰的一般实践中提供的抑郁症护理比较:基于登记的队列研究(挪威 GP-DEP 研究)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):1494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08793-7.
9
[No difference in frequency of family practitioner consultation by Turkish, Surinam and Moroccan 0-14-year-old children from Dutch children, but difference in reason for contact].土耳其、苏里南和摩洛哥0至14岁儿童与荷兰儿童在家庭医生咨询频率上无差异,但在就诊原因上存在差异。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 May 4;140(18):980-4.
10
Availability of Dutch General Practitioners for After-Hours Palliative Care.荷兰全科医生提供非工作时间姑息治疗的情况。
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):182-186. doi: 10.1177/0825859718766947. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Rates of SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infection or Severe COVID-19 and Associated Risk Factors After Primary and Booster Vaccination Against COVID-19 in the Netherlands.荷兰接种新冠疫苗初种和加强针后新冠病毒突破性感染或重症新冠肺炎的发生率及相关风险因素
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 26;13(6):564. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060564.
2
Implications of Data Extraction and Processing of Electronic Health Records for Epidemiological Research: Observational Study.电子健康记录的数据提取与处理对流行病学研究的影响:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 11;27:e64628. doi: 10.2196/64628.
3
General practitioner consultation for postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination-a self-controlled cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence, outcomes, and cost of chronic kidney disease in a contemporary population of 2·4 million patients from 11 countries: The CaReMe CKD study.来自11个国家的240万患者当代人群中慢性肾脏病的患病率、转归及成本:CaReMe CKD研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 30;20:100438. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100438. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Adherence and Persistence with Once-Daily vs Twice-Daily Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Analyses from the Netherlands, Italy and Germany.房颤患者中每日一次与每日两次直接口服抗凝剂的依从性和持续性:来自荷兰、意大利和德国的真实世界分析。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022 Jun;9(2):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00289-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗接种后绝经后出血的全科医生咨询——一项自我对照队列研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;91(8):2352-2362. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70045. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
Trends in initial pharmacological COPD treatment in primary care (2010-2021): a population-based study using the PHARMO Data Network.初级保健中慢性阻塞性肺疾病初始药物治疗的趋势(2010 - 2021年):一项使用PHARMO数据网络的基于人群的研究
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03073-w.
5
Antihypertensive medication classes and risk of incident dementia in primary care patients: a longitudinal cohort study in the Netherlands.抗高血压药物类别与基层医疗患者新发痴呆症风险:荷兰的一项纵向队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 15;42:100927. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100927. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Type 2 Diabetes, the Epidemic: Trends in Prevalence and Incidence, 2004-2020.2型糖尿病流行情况:2004 - 2020年患病率和发病率趋势
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Mar 28;17:1503-1509. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S445288. eCollection 2024.
7
Risk of cardiovascular events after an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the EXACOS-CV cohort study using the PHARMO Data Network in the Netherlands.慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重后心血管事件的风险:利用荷兰 PHARMO 数据网络的 EXACOS-CV 队列研究结果。
Respir Res. 2023 Nov 21;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02601-4.
8
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Netherlands and its cardiovascular and renal complications.荷兰慢性肾脏病的流行情况及其心血管和肾脏并发症。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03384-y.
9
Incidence of Lyme Borreliosis in the Dutch General Practice Population: A Large-Scale Population-Based Cohort Study Across the Netherlands Between 2015 and 2019.莱姆病在荷兰普通人群中的发病率:2015 年至 2019 年期间在荷兰全国范围内开展的一项大型基于人群的队列研究。
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):230-236. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0048. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
Real-World Evidence in EU Medicines Regulation: Enabling Use and Establishing Value.
欧盟药品监管中的真实世界证据:促进使用与确立价值
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;111(1):21-23. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2479. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
4
The use of real-world data/evidence in regulatory submissions.真实世界数据/证据在监管提交中的应用。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;109:106521. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106521. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
5
A steep increase in healthcare seeking behaviour in the last months before colorectal cancer diagnosis.在结直肠癌诊断前的最后几个月,寻求医疗保健的行为急剧增加。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01482-0.
6
Understanding Use of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decisions on Medical Product Effectiveness.理解真实世界数据和真实世界证据在支持医疗产品有效性监管决策中的应用。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;111(1):150-154. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2272. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Existing Data Sources for Clinical Epidemiology: The PHARMO Database Network.临床流行病学的现有数据来源:PHARMO数据库网络。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 29;12:415-422. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S247575. eCollection 2020.
8
Heart failure and chronic kidney disease manifestation and mortality risk associations in type 2 diabetes: A large multinational cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者心力衰竭和慢性肾脏病表现与死亡风险的相关性:一项大型跨国队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Sep;22(9):1607-1618. doi: 10.1111/dom.14074. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Estimating Morbidity Rates Based on Routine Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Observational Study.基于基层医疗中常规电子健康记录估算发病率:观察性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jul 26;7(3):e11929. doi: 10.2196/11929.
10
Burden of Exacerbations in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe COPD in the Netherlands: A Real-life Study.荷兰中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性加重的负担:一项真实生活研究
COPD. 2015 Apr;12(2):132-43. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.898053. Epub 2014 Jun 24.