Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 13;1(1):CD012557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012557.pub3.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is one of the most widespread psychiatric disorders leading to detrimental consequences to people with this disorder and others. Worldwide, the prevalence of heavy episodic drinking (30-day prevalence of at least one occasion of 60 g of pure alcohol intake among current drinkers) is estimated at 20% and the prevalence of AUD at 5% of the adult general population, with highest prevalence in Europe and North America. Therapeutic approaches, including pharmacotherapy, play an important role in treating people with AUD. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2018.
To evaluate the benefits and harms of baclofen on achieving and maintaining abstinence or reducing alcohol consumption in people with AUD compared to placebo, no treatment or any other pharmacological relapse prevention treatment.
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was 22 November 2021.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least four weeks' treatment duration and 12 weeks' overall study duration comparing baclofen for AUD treatment with placebo, no treatment or other treatments.
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. relapse, 2. frequency of use, 3. amount of use, 4. adverse events, 5. dropouts from treatment and 6. dropouts from treatment due to adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 7. craving, 8. anxiety, 9. depression and 10. frequency of most relevant adverse events.
We included 17 RCTs (1818 participants) with a diagnosis of alcohol dependence according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition or International Classification of Diseases 10th edition criteria. Mean age was 46.5 years and 70% were men. Ten studies compared baclofen to placebo or another medication; seven compared two baclofen doses to placebo or another medication. Globally, 15 studies compared baclofen to placebo, two baclofen to acamprosate and two baclofen to naltrexone. In 16 studies, participants received psychosocial treatments. We judged most studies at low risk of selection, performance, detection (subjective outcome), attrition and reporting bias. Ten studies detoxified participants before treatment; in seven studies, participants were still drinking at the beginning of treatment. Treatment duration was 12 weeks for 15 RCTs and longer in two studies. Baclofen daily dose was 30 mg to 300 mg: 10 RCTs used low doses (30 mg or less); eight RCTs medium doses (above 30 and 100 mg or less) and four RCTs high doses (above 100 mg). Compared to placebo, moderate-certainty evidence found that baclofen probably decreases the risk to relapse (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.99; 12 studies, 1057 participants). This result was confirmed among detoxified participants but not among other subgroups of participants. High-certainty evidence found that baclofen increases the percentage of days abstinent (mean difference (MD) 9.07, 95% CI 3.30 to 14.85; 16 studies, 1273 participants). This result was confirmed among all subgroups of participants except non-detoxified or those who received medium doses. There was no difference between baclofen and placebo in the other primary outcomes: heavy drinking days (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.18, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.11; 13 studies, 840 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); number of drinks per drinking days (MD -0.45, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.30; 9 studies, 392 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); number of participants with at least one adverse event (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11; 10 studies, 738 participants; high-certainty evidence); dropouts (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03; 17 studies, 1563 participants; high-certainty evidence); dropouts due to adverse events (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.18; 16 studies, 1499 participants; high-certainty evidence). These results were confirmed by subgroup analyses except than for the dropouts that resulted lower among participants who received high doses of baclofen and studies longer than 12 weeks. Compared to placebo, there was no difference in craving (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.04; 17 studies, 1275 participants), anxiety (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.11; 15 studies, 1123 participants) and depression (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.27; 11 studies, 1029 participants). Concerning the specific adverse events, baclofen increases fatigue, dizziness, somnolence/sedation, dry mouth, paraesthesia and muscle spasms/rigidity. There was no difference in the other adverse events. Compared to acamprosate, one study (60 participants) found no differences in any outcomes but the evidence was very uncertain: relapse (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.20; very low-certainty evidence); number of participants with at least one adverse event (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.69; very low-certainty evidence); dropouts (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.46; very low-certainty evidence); dropouts due to adverse events (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; very low-certainty evidence) and craving (MD 5.80, 95% CI -11.84 to 23.44); and all the adverse events evaluated. Compared to naltrexone, baclofen may increase the risk of relapse (RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.56; 1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and decrease the number of participants with at least one adverse event (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.80; 2 studies, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence) but the evidence is very uncertain. One study (60 participants) found no difference between baclofen and naltrexone in the dropouts at the end of treatment (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.10; very low-certainty evidence), craving (MD 2.08, 95% CI -3.71 to 7.87), and all the adverse events evaluated.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Baclofen likely reduces the risk of relapse to any drinking and increases the percentage of abstinent days, mainly among detoxified participants. It does not increase the number of participants with at least one adverse event, those who dropout for any reason or due to adverse events. It probably does not reduce number of heavy drinking days and the number of drinks per drinking days. Current evidence suggests that baclofen may help people with AUD in maintaining abstinence. The results of comparisons of baclofen with acamprosate and naltrexone were mainly based on only one study.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)是最常见的精神障碍之一,会给患者及其他人带来不利后果。在全球范围内,重度间歇性饮酒(当前饮酒者中有 30 天至少一次饮酒 60 克纯酒精)的患病率估计为 20%,AUD 的患病率为成年普通人群的 5%,在欧洲和北美患病率最高。包括药物治疗在内的治疗方法在治疗 AUD 患者方面发挥着重要作用。这是对 2018 年首次发表的 Cochrane 综述的更新。
评估巴氯芬在实现和维持戒断或减少 AUD 患者饮酒量方面的益处和危害,与安慰剂、无治疗或任何其他药物预防复发治疗相比。
我们使用了标准的、广泛的 Cochrane 检索方法。最新检索日期为 2021 年 11 月 22 日。
纳入至少 4 周治疗期和 12 周总研究期的随机对照试验(RCTs),比较 AUD 治疗中使用巴氯芬与安慰剂、无治疗或其他治疗。
我们使用了标准的 Cochrane 方法。我们的主要结局是 1. 复发,2. 使用率,3. 饮酒量,4. 不良事件,5. 治疗脱落,6. 因不良事件而治疗脱落。我们的次要结局是 7. 渴求,8. 焦虑,9. 抑郁,10. 最相关不良事件的频率。
我们纳入了 17 项 RCTs(1818 名参与者),这些参与者根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版或《国际疾病分类》第 10 版标准诊断为酒精依赖。平均年龄为 46.5 岁,70%为男性。10 项研究将巴氯芬与安慰剂或其他药物进行了比较;7 项研究将两种巴氯芬剂量与安慰剂或其他药物进行了比较。总体而言,15 项研究将巴氯芬与安慰剂进行了比较,两项研究将巴氯芬与阿坎酸进行了比较,两项研究将巴氯芬与纳曲酮进行了比较。在 16 项研究中,参与者接受了心理社会治疗。我们判断大多数研究在选择、表现、检测(主观结局)、失访和报告偏倚方面的风险较低。10 项研究使参与者戒断,7 项研究在治疗开始时参与者仍在饮酒。15 项 RCTs 的治疗持续时间为 12 周,两项研究的治疗持续时间更长。巴氯芬的每日剂量为 30mg 至 300mg:10 项 RCTs 使用低剂量(30mg 或更低);8 项 RCTs 使用中剂量(30 至 100mg 或更低),4 项 RCTs 使用高剂量(100mg 以上)。与安慰剂相比,中等确定性证据表明巴氯芬可能降低复发风险(风险比(RR)0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.77 至 0.99;12 项研究,1057 名参与者)。这一结果在戒断的参与者中得到了证实,但在其他亚组的参与者中没有得到证实。高确定性证据表明巴氯芬增加了无饮酒日的比例(平均差值(MD)9.07,95%置信区间(CI)3.30 至 14.85;16 项研究,1273 名参与者)。这一结果在除非戒断或接受中剂量治疗的参与者之外的所有亚组中都得到了证实。在其他主要结局方面,巴氯芬与安慰剂之间没有差异:重度饮酒天数(标准化均数差值(SMD)-0.18,95%置信区间(CI)-0.48 至 0.11;13 项研究,840 名参与者;中等确定性证据);饮酒日的饮酒量(MD -0.45,95%置信区间(CI)-1.20 至 0.30;9 项研究,392 名参与者;中等确定性证据);至少有一次不良事件的参与者人数(RR 1.05,95%置信区间(CI)0.99 至 1.11;10 项研究,738 名参与者;高确定性证据);脱落人数(RR 0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.74 至 1.03;17 项研究,1563 名参与者;高确定性证据);因不良事件而脱落的人数(RR 1.39,95%置信区间(CI)0.89 至 2.18;16 项研究,1499 名参与者;高确定性证据)。这些结果在除了高剂量巴氯芬治疗的参与者脱落率较低和研究时间超过 12 周的亚组分析中得到了证实。与安慰剂相比,巴氯芬在渴求(SMD -0.16,95%置信区间(CI)-0.37 至 0.04;17 项研究,1275 名参与者)、焦虑(MD -0.01,95%置信区间(CI)-0.14 至 0.11;15 项研究,1123 名参与者)和抑郁(SMD 0.07,95%置信区间(CI)-0.12 至 0.27;11 项研究,1029 名参与者)方面没有差异。关于特定的不良事件,巴氯芬增加了疲劳、头晕、镇静/嗜睡、口干、感觉异常和肌肉痉挛/僵硬。其他不良事件没有差异。与阿坎酸相比,一项研究(60 名参与者)发现任何结局均无差异,但证据非常不确定:复发(RR 1.25,95%置信区间(CI)0.71 至 2.20;非常低确定性证据);至少有一次不良事件的参与者人数(RR 0.63,95%置信区间(CI)0.23 至 1.69;非常低确定性证据);脱落人数(RR 0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.21 至 1.46;非常低确定性证据);因不良事件而脱落的人数(RR 0.33,95%置信区间(CI)0.01 至 7.87;非常低确定性证据)和渴求(MD 5.80,95%置信区间(CI)-11.84 至 23.44);以及所有评估的不良事件。与纳曲酮相比,巴氯芬可能增加复发风险(RR 2.50,95%置信区间(CI)1.12 至 5.56;1 项研究,60 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)和减少至少有一次不良事件的参与者人数(RR 0.35,95%置信区间(CI)0.15 至 0.80;2 项研究,80 名参与者;非常低确定性证据),但证据非常不确定。一项研究(60 名参与者)发现巴氯芬与纳曲酮在治疗结束时的脱落率方面没有差异(RR 1.00,95%置信区间(CI)0.32 至 3.10;非常低确定性证据)、渴求(MD 2.08,95%置信区间(CI)-3.71 至 7.87)和所有评估的不良事件。
巴氯芬可能降低 AUD 患者的复发风险,增加无饮酒日的比例,主要在戒断的参与者中。它不会增加至少有一次不良事件、因任何原因或因不良事件而脱落的参与者人数。它可能不会减少重度饮酒天数和饮酒日的饮酒量。目前的证据表明,巴氯芬可能有助于 AUD 患者戒酒。巴氯芬与阿坎酸和纳曲酮的比较结果主要基于一项研究。