Suppr超能文献

成人及老年中国人群特应性皮炎诊断标准的验证及新诊断标准的提出:一项多中心、前瞻性、基于临床环境的研究

Validation of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis and proposal of novel diagnostic criteria for adult and elderly Chinese populations: a multicentre, prospective, clinical setting-based study.

作者信息

Yue Wanbo, Cheng Daian, Sun Zhe, Shen Yihang, Wang Shangshang, Liu Xiumei, Pei Xiaoping, Deng Sisi, Pan Hongju, Liao Zhigang, Li Wei, Yao Xu, Liang Yunsheng, Song Zhiqiang, Yao Zhirong, Zhang Hui, Guo Yifeng

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Institute of Dermatology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2023 Feb 22;188(3):420-426. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac097.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A previous validation study showed a very low sensitivity and higher specificity associated with Hanifin and Rajka criteria (H&R) and the UK Working Party criteria (UKWP) in diagnosing AD vs. the Chinese criteria of atopic dermatitis (AD) for children (CCAD). However, their diagnostic efficacy in adult and elderly Chinese populations remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the diagnostic efficacy of three sets of AD criteria in adult and elderly Chinese populations in a hospital setting.

METHODS

A total of 1034 patients (aged 19-95 years) from five university hospital dermatological clinics were recruited. Medical history, dermatological examination, AD diagnosis and evaluation of AD severity were done by dermatologists. Each patient was investigated by two dermatologist panels, one to establish a clinical diagnosis, and the other to identify and record the major or minor signs of H&R criteria, UKWP criteria and CCAD. Taking clinical diagnosis as the reference, the diagnostic efficacy of three sets of diagnostic criteria was evaluated. The χ2 test or rank sum test were used for between-groups comparisons.

RESULTS

CCAD had a higher sensitivity (84.0%), especially among mild and moderate cases of AD (72.7% and 90.3%, respectively), than the H&R (58.0%; P < 0.001) and UKWP criteria (56.0%; P < 0.001) in diagnosing AD. The specificity of CCAD (92.7%) was slightly lower than the H&R (97.3%; P < 0.001) or UKWP criteria (97.4%; P < 0.001). The CCAD had the highest Youden index (0.77), accuracy rate (0.90) and Kappa value (0.76) of the three sets of diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with results in a population of Chinese children, although the H&R and UKWP criteria had a high specificity for diagnosing AD, their low sensitivity limited their use in adult and elderly Chinese patients. Based on the high sensitivity and favourable diagnostic efficacy, the CCAD is proposed for AD diagnosis in adult and elderly Chinese populations, especially for cases of mild and moderate AD.

摘要

背景

先前的一项验证研究表明,与儿童特应性皮炎(AD)的中国标准(CCAD)相比,Hanifin和Rajka标准(H&R)以及英国工作组标准(UKWP)在诊断AD时敏感性非常低,特异性较高。然而,它们在成年和老年中国人群中的诊断效能仍不清楚。

目的

在医院环境中验证三组AD标准在成年和老年中国人群中的诊断效能。

方法

招募了来自五所大学医院皮肤科门诊的1034例患者(年龄19 - 95岁)。皮肤科医生进行病史采集、皮肤科检查、AD诊断及AD严重程度评估。每位患者由两个皮肤科医生小组进行检查,一组用于确立临床诊断,另一组用于识别和记录H&R标准、UKWP标准和CCAD的主要或次要体征。以临床诊断为参考,评估三组诊断标准的诊断效能。组间比较采用χ2检验或秩和检验。

结果

在诊断AD方面,CCAD的敏感性较高(84.0%),尤其是在轻度和中度AD病例中(分别为72.7%和90.3%),高于H&R标准(58.0%;P < 0.001)和UKWP标准(56.0%;P < 0.001)。CCAD的特异性(92.7%)略低于H&R标准(97.3%;P < 0.001)或UKWP标准(97.4%;P < 0.001)。CCAD在三组诊断标准中具有最高的约登指数(0.77)、准确率(0.90)和kappa值(0.76)。

结论

与中国儿童人群的结果一致,尽管H&R和UKWP标准在诊断AD时具有较高的特异性,但其低敏感性限制了它们在成年和老年中国患者中的应用。基于高敏感性和良好的诊断效能,建议将CCAD用于成年和老年中国人群的AD诊断,尤其是轻度和中度AD病例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验