Suppr超能文献

英国工作组成人特应性皮炎标准的优势与局限性。

Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults.

作者信息

Thyssen J P, Andersen Y, Halling A-S, Williams H C, Egeberg A

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.

Copenhagen Research Group for Inflammatory Skin (CORGIS), Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Aug;34(8):1764-1772. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16364. Epub 2020 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United Kingdom Working Party's (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, three independent samples of adult individuals were drawn and interviewed: patients with a hospital diagnosis of AD or plaque psoriasis in adulthood, and general population controls. Various versions of the UKWP criteria for AD were utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 3490 (general population), 3834 (AD) and 4016 (psoriasis) adult individuals were enrolled in the study. The best combination of the UKWP criteria leads to a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.96 in the general population. The criteria better captured 'AD ever' compared with 'AD within the past 12 months' and had a higher sensitivity in patients with moderate (87.2-97.7%) or severe (95.8-100%) AD at the time of interview compared with those who where asymptomatic (12.6-36.8%). The UKWP criteria also captured high proportions of psoriasis patients (19.7-47.7%) when applied in a cohort of unique psoriasis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It remains a challenge to accurately diagnose a history of AD in adulthood since symptoms are shared with other skin conditions and AD may have resolved or can be waxing and waning, in turn leading to recall bias. The UKWP criteria performed well in the general population for the purpose of determining the prevalence, but should be used cautiously when studying comorbidity.

摘要

背景

英国工作组(UKWP)的标准旨在改善特应性皮炎(AD)的流行病学研究,但尚未在纯欧洲成年人群体中得到验证。

目的

验证UKWP在成人中诊断AD的标准。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,抽取并访谈了三个独立的成年个体样本:成年期医院诊断为AD或斑块状银屑病的患者以及普通人群对照。使用了各种版本的UKWP的AD标准。

结果

共有3490名(普通人群)、3834名(AD患者)和4016名(银屑病患者)成年个体纳入研究。UKWP标准的最佳组合在普通人群中的灵敏度为0.71,特异度为0.96。与“过去12个月内的AD”相比,该标准能更好地捕捉“曾经患过AD”的情况,并且与无症状者(12.6 - 36.8%)相比,在访谈时中度(87.2 - 97.7%)或重度(95.8 - 100%)AD患者中的灵敏度更高。在一组独特的银屑病患者队列中应用时,UKWP标准也能捕捉到高比例的银屑病患者(19.7 - 47.7%)。

结论

准确诊断成年期AD病史仍然是一项挑战,因为症状与其他皮肤疾病有重叠,且AD可能已经缓解或病情有波动,进而导致回忆偏倚。UKWP标准在普通人群中用于确定患病率时表现良好,但在研究合并症时应谨慎使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验