• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于戒除的工资补贴的成本和成本效益。

Cost and cost-effectiveness of abstinence contingent wage supplements.

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109754. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109754. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109754
PMID:36638680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10207811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorders are correlated with unemployment and poverty. However, few interventions aim to improve substance use, unemployment, and, distally, poverty. The Abstinence-Contingent Wage Supplement (ACWS) randomized controlled trial combined a therapeutic workplace with abstinence-contingent wage supplements to address substance use and unemployment. The ACWS study found that abstinence-contingent wage supplements increased the percentage of participants who had negative drug tests, who were employed, and who were above the poverty line during the intervention period. This study presents the cost of ACWS and calculates the cost-effectiveness of ACWS compared with usual care.

METHODS

To calculate the cost and cost-effectiveness of ACWS, we used activity-based costing methods to cost the intervention and calculated the costs from the provider and healthcare sector perspective. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for negative drug tests and employment.

RESULTS

ACWS cost $11,310 per participant over the 12-month intervention period. Total intervention and healthcare costs per participant over the intervention period were $20,625 for usual care and $30,686 for ACWS. At the end of the intervention period an additional participant with a negative drug test cost $1437 while an additional participant employed cost $915.

CONCLUSIONS

ACWS increases drug abstinence and employment and may be cost-effective at the end of the 12-month intervention period if decision makers are willing to pay the incremental cost associated with the intervention.

摘要

背景

物质使用障碍与失业和贫困有关。然而,很少有干预措施旨在改善物质使用、失业,以及更遥远的贫困问题。有条件禁欲工资补贴(ACWS)随机对照试验将治疗性工作场所与有条件禁欲工资补贴相结合,以解决物质使用和失业问题。ACWS 研究发现,有条件禁欲工资补贴增加了药物检测呈阴性、就业和收入超过贫困线的参与者的比例,在干预期间。本研究介绍了 ACWS 的成本,并计算了 ACWS 与常规护理相比的成本效益。

方法

为了计算 ACWS 的成本和成本效益,我们使用基于活动的成本核算方法来计算干预的成本,并从提供者和医疗保健部门的角度计算成本。我们计算了阴性药物测试和就业的增量成本效益比和成本效益可接受性曲线。

结果

ACWS 在 12 个月的干预期间,每位参与者的成本为 11310 美元。在干预期间,每位参与者的总干预和医疗保健成本为常规护理的 20625 美元和 ACWS 的 30686 美元。在干预期末,额外的阴性药物测试参与者的成本为 1437 美元,而额外的就业参与者的成本为 915 美元。

结论

ACWS 增加了药物戒断和就业,并且如果决策者愿意支付与干预相关的增量成本,那么在 12 个月的干预期末可能具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost and cost-effectiveness of abstinence contingent wage supplements.基于戒除的工资补贴的成本和成本效益。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109754. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109754. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Abstinence-contingent wage supplements to promote drug abstinence and employment: Post-intervention outcomes.基于戒毒的工资补助促进戒毒和就业:干预后的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109322. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109322. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
Abstinence-contingent wage supplements to promote drug abstinence and employment: a randomised controlled trial.基于戒毒情况的工资补助以促进戒毒和就业:一项随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 May;74(5):445-452. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213761. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Abstinence-contingent wage supplements for adults experiencing homelessness and alcohol use disorder: A randomized clinical trial.无酒精使用障碍的 homeless 成年人的工资补助:一项随机临床试验。
Prev Med. 2023 Nov;176:107655. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107655. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
5
Costs and effectiveness of substance abuse treatments for homeless persons.针对无家可归者的药物滥用治疗的成本与效果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):33-42.
6
Employment-based abstinence reinforcement as a maintenance intervention for the treatment of cocaine dependence: a randomized controlled trial.以就业为基础的禁欲强化作为可卡因依赖治疗的维持干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2009 Sep;104(9):1530-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02657.x.
7
Costs and Effectiveness of Treating Homeless Persons with Cocaine Addiction with Alternative Contingency Management Strategies.采用替代权变管理策略治疗可卡因成瘾无家可归者的成本与效果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2017 Mar 1;20(1):21-36.
8
Cost-effectiveness of electronic- and clinician-delivered screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for women in reproductive health centers.电子和临床医生提供的筛查、简短干预和转介治疗对生殖健康中心女性的成本效益。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1659-1669. doi: 10.1111/add.14668. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Employment-based abstinence reinforcement as a maintenance intervention for the treatment of cocaine dependence: post-intervention outcomes.以就业为基础的禁欲强化作为可卡因依赖治疗的维持干预措施:干预后的结果。
Addiction. 2011 May;106(5):960-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03364.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
10
The Therapeutic Utility of Employment in Treating Drug Addiction: Science to Application.就业在药物成瘾治疗中的治疗效用:从科学到应用
Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;2(2):203-212. doi: 10.1037/tps0000061.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery support services as part of the continuum of care for alcohol or drug use disorders.康复支持服务作为酒精或药物使用障碍连续护理的一部分。
Addiction. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1111/add.16751.
2
Cost and cost-effectiveness of abstinence-contingent wage supplements for adults experiencing homelessness and alcohol use disorder.为无家可归且患有酒精使用障碍的成年人提供基于戒酒的工资补贴的成本及成本效益
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209569. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209569. Epub 2024 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Abstinence-contingent wage supplements to promote drug abstinence and employment: Post-intervention outcomes.基于戒毒的工资补助促进戒毒和就业:干预后的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109322. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109322. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
2
Contingency Management for Patients Receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的患者的应急管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1092-1102. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1969.
3
Employment outcomes of substance use disorder patients enrolled in a therapeutic workplace intervention for drug abstinence and employment.参加旨在戒毒和就业的治疗性工作场所干预项目的物质使用障碍患者的就业成果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jan;120:108160. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108160. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
The economic burden of opioid use disorder and fatal opioid overdose in the United States, 2017.2017 年美国阿片类药物使用障碍和致命阿片类药物过量的经济负担。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108350. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108350. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Financial incentives promote engagement in employment services for unemployed adults in treatment for opioid use disorder.经济激励措施可促进接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的失业成年人参与就业服务。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107982. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107982. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
6
Abstinence-contingent wage supplements to promote drug abstinence and employment: a randomised controlled trial.基于戒毒情况的工资补助以促进戒毒和就业:一项随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 May;74(5):445-452. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-213761. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
The Utility of Operant Conditioning to Address Poverty and Drug Addiction.操作性条件反射在解决贫困和药物成瘾问题上的效用。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jun 5;42(3):525-546. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00203-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Re-engineering methadone-Cost-effectiveness analysis of a patient-centered approach to methadone treatment.美沙酮再工程-以患者为中心的美沙酮治疗成本效益分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders.物质使用障碍经济评估的货币转换因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Oct;81:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Behavior analysts in the war on poverty: A review of the use of financial incentives to promote education and employment.行为分析师在消除贫困之战中的作用:对利用经济激励措施促进教育和就业的综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):9-20. doi: 10.1002/jeab.233. Epub 2017 Jan 11.