• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军人轻度创伤性脑损伤患者强化门诊项目反应:不同后脑震荡症状亚组间的变化。

Intensive Outpatient Program Response Among Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Change Between Distinct Post-Concussive Symptom Subgroups.

机构信息

VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Aurora, CO; University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Aurora, CO.

VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Aurora, CO; Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jun;104(6):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.191. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.191
PMID:36639092
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among service members (SMs) with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) admitted to an intensive outpatient program (IOP), we identified qualitatively distinct subgroups based on post-concussive symptoms (PCSs) and characterized changes between subgroups from admission to discharge. Further, we examined whether co-morbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) influenced changes between subgroups.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental. Latent transition analysis identified distinctive subgroups of SMs and examined transitions between subgroups from admission to discharge. Logistic regression examined the effect of PTSD on transition to the Minimal subgroup (low probability of any moderate-very severe PCS) while adjusting for admission subgroup designation.

SETTING

National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE) at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

1141 active duty SMs with persistent PCS despite prior treatment (N=1141).

INTERVENTIONS

NICoE 4-week interdisciplinary IOP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subgroups identified using Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory items at admission and discharge.

RESULTS

Model fit indices supported a 7-class solution. The 7 subgroups of SMs were distinguished by diverging patterns of probability for specific PCS. The Minimal subgroup was most prevalent at discharge (39.4%), followed by the Sleep subgroup (high probability of sleep problems, low probability of other PCS; 26.8%). 41% and 25% of SMs admitted within the Affective (ie, predominantly affective PCS) and Sleep subgroups remained within the same group at discharge, respectively. The 19% of SMs with co-morbid PTSD were less likely to transition to the Minimal subgroup (odds ratio=0.28; P<.001) and were more likely to remain in their admission subgroup at discharge (35.5% with PTSD vs 22.2% without).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of SMs achieved symptom resolution after participation in the IOP, with most transitioning to subgroups characterized by reduced symptom burden. SMs admitted in the Affective and Sleep subgroups, as well as those with PTSD, were most likely to have continuing clinical needs at discharge, revealing priority targets for resource allocation and follow-up treatment.

摘要

目的

在因轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)而接受强化门诊治疗(IOP)的军人(SMs)中,我们根据脑震荡后症状(PCS)确定了性质不同的亚组,并描述了从入院到出院亚组之间的变化。此外,我们还研究了合并创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是否会影响亚组之间的变化。

设计

准实验。潜在转移分析确定了军人的独特亚组,并检查了从入院到出院亚组之间的转移情况。逻辑回归检查了 PTSD 对向最小亚组(任何中度至重度 PCS 概率低)转移的影响,同时调整了入院亚组指定。

地点

位于 Walter Reed 国家军事医疗中心的国家坚韧卓越中心(NICoE)。

参与者

1141 名因持续存在 PCS 而接受治疗(N=1141)的现役军人。

干预措施

NICoE 4 周的跨学科 IOP。

主要观察指标

入院和出院时使用神经行为症状量表(Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory)项目确定的亚组。

结果

模型拟合指数支持 7 类解决方案。SMs 的 7 个亚组通过特定 PCS 概率的发散模式来区分。最小亚组在出院时最常见(39.4%),其次是睡眠亚组(睡眠问题发生率高,其他 PCS 发生率低;26.8%)。入院时在情感(即主要是情感 PCS)和睡眠亚组中的 41%和 25%的 SMs 分别在出院时仍留在同一组。合并 PTSD 的 19%的 SMs 向最小亚组转移的可能性较低(比值比=0.28;P<.001),并且更有可能在出院时留在入院亚组(35.5%有 PTSD 与 22.2%无 PTSD)。

结论

大多数 SMs 在参加 IOP 后症状得到缓解,大多数人向症状负担减轻的亚组转移。入院时处于情感和睡眠亚组的 SMs,以及患有 PTSD 的 SMs,在出院时最有可能有持续的临床需求,这揭示了资源分配和后续治疗的优先目标。

相似文献

1
Intensive Outpatient Program Response Among Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Change Between Distinct Post-Concussive Symptom Subgroups.军人轻度创伤性脑损伤患者强化门诊项目反应:不同后脑震荡症状亚组间的变化。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jun;104(6):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.191. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Intensive Outpatient Program in Treating Combat-Related Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health Conditions.一个跨学科强化门诊项目在治疗与战斗相关的创伤性脑损伤和心理健康状况方面的疗效。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 18;11:580182. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.580182. eCollection 2020.
3
Sleep problems contribute to post-concussive symptoms in service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury without posttraumatic stress disorder or major depressive disorder.睡眠问题会导致曾有轻度创伤性脑损伤但无创伤后应激障碍或重度抑郁障碍病史的现役军人出现脑震荡后症状。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):511-521. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192702.
4
Observational study of associations between visual imagery and measures of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress among active-duty military service members with traumatic brain injury at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.观察性研究:在沃尔特·里德国家军事医学中心,现役有创伤性脑损伤的军事人员中,视觉意象与抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激相关测量指标之间的关联。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 11;8(6):e021448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021448.
5
Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury: Generalization of Prolonged-Exposure PTSD Treatment Outcomes to Postconcussive Symptoms, Cognition, and Self-Efficacy in Veterans and Active Duty Service Members.创伤后应激障碍与创伤性脑损伤共病:退伍军人和现役军人中,延长暴露疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的结果对脑震荡后症状、认知及自我效能的推广应用
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):E53-E63. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000344.
6
Differences in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Attribution of Symptoms in Service Members With Combat Versus Noncombat Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.患有战斗性与非战斗性轻度创伤性脑损伤的军人在创伤后应激障碍、抑郁及症状归因方面的差异
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):37-45. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000486.
7
[Mild traumatic brain injury and postconcussive syndrome: a re-emergent questioning].[轻度创伤性脑损伤与脑震荡后综合征:一个重新出现的问题探讨]
Encephale. 2012 Sep;38(4):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
8
Latent Neuropsychological Profiles to Discriminate Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Active-Duty Service Members.潜伏性神经心理学特征可区分现役军人中的轻度创伤性脑损伤和创伤后应激障碍。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(6):E438-E448. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000779. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Identifying and Predicting Subgroups of Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Distinct Configurations of Postconcussive Symptom Endorsement: A Latent Class Analysis.基于不同的脑震荡后症状表现模式识别和预测轻度创伤性脑损伤退伍军人亚群:一项潜在类别分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(4):247-257. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000890. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
10
Identifying Unique Symptom Groups Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and PTSD Checklist-5 in Military Personnel: A Bifactor Analysis.使用神经行为症状量表和创伤后应激障碍检查表-5在军事人员中识别轻度创伤性脑损伤后的独特症状群:双因素分析
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023;38(6):E371-E383. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000854. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise Intolerance After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Occurs in All Subtypes in the Adult Population.成年人所有类型的轻度创伤性脑损伤后均会出现运动不耐受。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Mar;41(5-6):635-645. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Sep 15.