• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Nonspecialists Delivering a Brief Depression Treatment in the United States: A Qualitative Investigation.非专业人员在美国提供简短抑郁症治疗的观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04528-y.
2
Acceptability and appropriateness of a perinatal depression preventive group intervention: a qualitative analysis.围产期抑郁预防团体干预的可接受性和适宜性:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 7;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5031-z.
3
Designing an App to Support Measurement-Based Peer Supervision of Frontline Health Workers Delivering Brief Psychosocial Interventions in Texas: Multimethod Study.设计一款应用程序以支持对在德克萨斯州提供简短心理社会干预的一线卫生工作者进行基于测量的同伴监督:多方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 11;8:e55205. doi: 10.2196/55205.
4
Family-based youth mental health interventions delivered by nonspecialist providers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家非专科医疗服务提供者开展的基于家庭的青少年心理健康干预措施:一项系统综述
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Jun;36(2):182-197. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000334.
5
Acceptability and feasibility of using non-specialist health workers to deliver mental health care: stakeholder perceptions from the PRIME district sites in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa, and Uganda.利用非专业卫生工作者提供精神卫生保健服务的可接受性和可行性:来自埃塞俄比亚、印度、尼泊尔、南非和乌干达PRIME地区站点的利益相关者看法
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
6
A process evaluation exploring the lay counsellor experience of delivering a task shared psycho-social intervention for perinatal depression in Khayelitsha, South Africa.一项过程评估,探索在南非开普敦凯伊利沙为围产期抑郁症患者提供任务共享心理社会干预的外行人顾问的经历。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1397-9.
7
Implementation and Effectiveness of Nonspecialist-Delivered Interventions for Perinatal Mental Health in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非专业人员提供的干预措施在高收入国家围产期心理健康中的实施和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):498-509. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4556.
8
Acceptability and fidelity of a psychosocial intervention (PROACTIVE) for older adults with depression in a basic health unit in São Paulo, Brazil: a qualitative study.巴西圣保罗基础卫生单位中针对老年抑郁症患者的心理社会干预措施(PROACTIVE)的可接受性和忠实度:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):2278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12402-3.
9
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
"We improved our life because I cut my drinking": Qualitative analysis of a brief intervention for people with alcohol use disorder in Ethiopian primary health care.“我减少了饮酒量,从而改善了生活”:在埃塞俄比亚初级卫生保健中对酒精使用障碍人群实施简短干预的定性分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108636. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108636. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"I would not want the mechanic to direct me to an engine repair manual": a qualitative analysis of provider perspectives on low-intensity treatments for patients on waiting lists.“我不想让机械师指导我去看发动机维修手册”:对等待名单上的患者接受低强度治疗的提供者观点进行的定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05055-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Oppression is not "culture": The need to center systemic and structural determinants to address anti-Black racism and racial trauma in psychotherapy.压迫不是“文化”:需要以系统性和结构性决定因素为中心,以解决心理治疗中的反黑人种族主义和种族创伤。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2023 Mar;60(1):76-85. doi: 10.1037/pst0000446. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
A low-intensity behavioral intervention for depression in older adults delivered by lay coaches: proof-of-concept trial.由非专业指导者实施的针对老年人抑郁症的低强度行为干预:概念验证试验。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(7):1403-1410. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084709. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
"Do More, Feel Better": Pilot RCT of Lay-Delivered Behavioral Activation for Depressed Senior Center Clients.“多做一点,感觉好一点”:针对老年中心抑郁客户的由非专业人员实施的行为激活的初步随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2022 May;53(3):458-468. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
4
Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward.《COVID-19 大流行第一年的心理健康:回顾与前进建议》。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul;17(4):915-936. doi: 10.1177/17456916211029964. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
A qualitative investigation of promotores' perspectives on task-shifting evidence-based mental health care for Latinxs in a rural community.一项关于农村地区拉丁裔人群基于证据的精神卫生保健任务转移促进者观点的定性研究。
Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):689-694. doi: 10.1037/ser0000433. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
"How could I not bring it up?": A multiple case study of therapists' comfort when Black clients discuss anti-Black racism in sessions.“我怎么能不提呢?”:对治疗师在治疗中讨论反黑人种族主义时感到舒适的多案例研究。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2023 Mar;60(1):63-75. doi: 10.1037/pst0000404. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
7
Older adults respond better to psychological therapy than working-age adults: evidence from a large sample of mental health service attendees.老年人对心理治疗的反应优于工作年龄的成年人:来自大量心理健康服务参与者的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.084. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Conceptual framework for task shifting and task sharing: an international Delphi study.概念框架用于任务转移和任务分担:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 May 3;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00605-z.
9
Understanding Psychological Distress and Protective Factors Amongst Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.了解新冠疫情期间老年人的心理困扰及保护因素
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;29(9):881-894. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Implementation and Effectiveness of Nonspecialist-Delivered Interventions for Perinatal Mental Health in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非专业人员提供的干预措施在高收入国家围产期心理健康中的实施和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):498-509. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4556.

非专业人员在美国提供简短抑郁症治疗的观点:一项定性研究。

Perspectives of Nonspecialists Delivering a Brief Depression Treatment in the United States: A Qualitative Investigation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 South Maryland Parkway, MS 5030, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89154-5030, USA.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04528-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-023-04528-y
PMID:36639746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9839228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Task sharing is an implementation strategy which increases access to services by training and supporting treatment delivery by nonspecialists. Such an approach has demonstrated effectiveness for depression and other mental health outcomes; however, few studies in high-income countries have examined nonspecialist providers' (NSPs) perspectives of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of delivering mental health interventions. We examine qualitative reports of NSPs experiences delivering a brief structured behavioral intervention for depression (called "Do More, Feel Better" [DMFB]) to adults aged 55 and older.

METHODS

All NSPs (N = 4, 100%) who delivered DMFB participated in a focus group to probe their perceptions of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of both the intervention and their delivery experience as NSPs. Two coders analyzed the qualitative data from focus groups using codebook thematic analysis.

RESULTS

NSPs perceived the intervention and delivery experience to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. Qualitative results provided insight into specific barriers and facilitators which may be important to consider when planning to implement task sharing. Themes that emerged from qualitative data included supervision being highly acceptable and feasible, appropriateness of the intervention for NSPs, and the feasibility of tailoring the intervention to patient participants. NSPs also expressed difficulty managing emotional investment in patients' success and providing therapy during a pandemic and racial violence in the US.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results can inform future implementation and sustainment of task sharing interventions to expand access to care.

摘要

背景

任务分担是一种实施策略,通过培训和支持非专业人员提供治疗服务来增加服务的可及性。这种方法已经证明对抑郁症和其他心理健康结果有效;然而,在高收入国家,很少有研究考察非专业提供者(NSPs)对提供心理健康干预措施的可接受性、可行性和适当性的看法。我们研究了 NSPs 提供针对 55 岁及以上成年人的简短结构化行为干预(称为“做更多,感觉更好”[DMFB])的经验的定性报告。

方法

所有提供 DMFB 的 NSP(N=4,100%)都参加了焦点小组,以探究他们对干预措施以及作为 NSP 提供干预措施的可接受性、可行性和适当性的看法。两位编码员使用代码本主题分析对焦点小组的定性数据进行了分析。

结果

NSPs 认为干预措施和交付体验是可接受、可行和适当的。定性结果深入了解了在计划实施任务分担时可能需要考虑的具体障碍和促进因素。从定性数据中出现的主题包括监督是高度可接受和可行的、干预措施对 NSPs 的适宜性以及根据患者参与者的情况调整干预措施的可行性。NSPs 还表示,在大流行和美国种族暴力期间,他们在管理对患者成功的情感投入以及提供治疗方面存在困难。

结论

我们的研究结果可以为未来实施和维持任务分担干预措施以扩大获得护理的机会提供信息。