Suppr超能文献

压迫不是“文化”:需要以系统性和结构性决定因素为中心,以解决心理治疗中的反黑人种族主义和种族创伤。

Oppression is not "culture": The need to center systemic and structural determinants to address anti-Black racism and racial trauma in psychotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Augusta University.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2023 Mar;60(1):76-85. doi: 10.1037/pst0000446. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Abstract

Psychology, and the United States more broadly, finds itself at yet another reckoning point with White supremacy and anti-Black racism. The has even recently apologized for psychology's role in upholding systemic racism and White supremacy, and articulated expectations for psychology's role in dismantling systemic racism and White supremacy throughout psychology. Yet, the norms of White supremacy pervade our professional and individual consciousness, resulting in our radical movements toward a "culturally responsive psychotherapy" seeking to adapt to, and ultimately becoming quashed by, the very oppressive systems it seeks to upend. In this article, I argue first that to address anti-Black racism and racial trauma in psychotherapy, it is imperative to move beyond notions of "culture" and "identity" to a structural competency model of psychotherapy and psychotherapy training. Structural competency and examples of its integration are briefly discussed. I then offer and expand upon two additional recommendations: That we must learn about and incorporate the incredible work of Black, Indigenous, and people of color scholars who have offered robust guidance in how to engage in healing racial trauma in individual and family psychotherapy; and, that to ethically engage in and develop an antiracist psychotherapy equipped to heal racial trauma, we must individually and collectively engage in our own conscientization and radical racial healing. Throughout, I emphasize the importance of prioritizing the work of scholars of color, whose work I seek here to integrate and build upon, but do so as a low socioeconomic status-origin, White woman with disabilities scholar situated at complex axes of both privilege and oppression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

心理学,乃至整个美国,都发现自己正处于与白人至上主义和反黑人种族主义的又一次清算点。美国心理协会甚至最近为心理学在维护系统种族主义和白人至上主义方面所扮演的角色道歉,并阐明了心理学在整个心理学领域中消除系统种族主义和白人至上主义的作用的期望。然而,白人至上主义的规范充斥着我们的专业和个人意识,导致我们朝着“文化响应性心理治疗”的激进运动,试图适应并最终被它试图颠覆的压迫性系统所压制。在本文中,我首先认为,要解决心理治疗中的反黑人种族主义和种族创伤,必须超越“文化”和“身份”的概念,采用心理治疗和心理治疗培训的结构性能力模式。简要讨论了结构性能力及其整合的例子。然后,我提出并扩展了另外两个建议:我们必须了解并吸收黑人、土著和有色人种学者的令人难以置信的工作,这些学者在如何在个体和家庭心理治疗中参与治愈种族创伤方面提供了有力的指导;为了在道德上参与并发展一种能够治愈种族创伤的反种族主义心理治疗,我们必须个人和集体参与我们自己的意识和激进的种族疗愈。在整个过程中,我强调重视有色人种学者工作的重要性,我在这里寻求整合和建立他们的工作,但作为一个社会经济地位较低的、残疾的白人女性学者,我处于特权和压迫的复杂轴线上。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验