• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏分配变更和多种临时循环支持作为桥接桥。

Heart Allocation Change and Multiple Temporary Circulatory Support as Bridge-to-Bridge.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 May;285:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.021. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.021
PMID:36640608
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We investigated how the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network heart allocation policy change was associated with changes in characteristics and outcomes of candidates receiving multiple temporary mechanical circulatory support (mtMCS) devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included adult heart transplant candidates listed October 2014-January 2018 and October 2018-January 2022 in the United Network of Organ Sharing dataset. Prepolicy and postpolicy mtMCS recipients were compared at listing, transplant, 90-days, and 1-year post-transplant. Time between first and second devices and time between first device and transplant were modeled via multivariable linear regression. Transplantation likelihood was modeled using competing risks analysis.

RESULTS

Postpolicy, a higher proportion of transplant candidates received mtMCS (4% versus 1%, P < 0.001), and received their second device an adjusted 49 d sooner versus prepolicy (P = 0.001). Time to transplant was also an adjusted 35 d shorter postpolicy, with an 80% increased transplantation likelihood versus prepolicy (95% confidence interval: 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001). Postpolicy patients experienced reduced waitlist mortality (8% versus 14%, P = 0.04) with marked improvements in 90-day (93% versus 85%, P < 0.001) and 1-year (88% versus 70%, P = 0.01) post-transplant survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Postpolicy mtMCS recipients are more likely to progress to transplantation sooner on the waitlist and their shorter waitlist course together with earlier change to a secondary device was associated with improved post-transplant survival versus prepolicy.

摘要

引言

我们研究了 2018 年器官获取与移植网络心脏分配政策的改变如何与接受多次临时机械循环支持(mtMCS)设备的候选者的特征和结局变化相关。

材料和方法

我们纳入了 2014 年 10 月至 2018 年 1 月和 2018 年 10 月至 2022 年 1 月在美国器官共享网络数据集(United Network of Organ Sharing dataset)中列出的成年心脏移植候选者。在列出、移植、90 天和移植后 1 年时,比较了政策前和政策后 mtMCS 的接受者。使用多变量线性回归模型来模拟第一和第二设备之间以及第一设备和移植之间的时间。使用竞争风险分析来模拟移植的可能性。

结果

政策后,更多的移植候选者接受了 mtMCS(4%比 1%,P<0.001),并且与政策前相比,他们的第二台设备提前了 49 天(P=0.001)。政策后,移植时间也提前了 35 天,与政策前相比,移植的可能性增加了 80%(95%置信区间:1.6-1.9,P<0.001)。政策后患者的等待名单死亡率降低(8%比 14%,P=0.04),90 天(93%比 85%,P<0.001)和 1 年(88%比 70%,P=0.01)的移植后存活率显著提高。

结论

政策后 mtMCS 的接受者更有可能在等待名单上更早地进展到移植,他们在等待名单上的较短时间以及更早地更换第二台设备与政策前相比,与移植后的生存改善相关。

相似文献

1
Heart Allocation Change and Multiple Temporary Circulatory Support as Bridge-to-Bridge.心脏分配变更和多种临时循环支持作为桥接桥。
J Surg Res. 2023 May;285:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.021. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
2
Association of center-level temporary mechanical circulatory support use and waitlist outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation policy.2018 年成人心脏分配政策后,中心水平临时机械循环支持的使用与候补名单结果的关联。
Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):844-850. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.OPTN 政策变化对具有耐用性左心室辅助装置和慢性肾脏病患者的影响:UNOS 数据库分析。
Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;48(10):1180-1189. doi: 10.1111/aor.14770. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO.ECMO 支持的成人先天性心脏病患者候补名单和移植结果的新分配政策的影响。
Artif Organs. 2024 Aug;48(8):912-920. doi: 10.1111/aor.14738. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
5
Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.2018 年供者分配结构调整后适应性变化及患者生存情况分析:UNOS 数据库分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359. Epub 2024 May 22.
6
Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.可接受的心脏移植术后结果支持在新的 OPTN|UNOS 心脏分配政策中优先考虑临时 MCS。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jan-Feb;53(1):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.2018 年心脏分配政策变化后成人心脏移植的发展趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):159-167. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4909.
8
Increasing waiting times for status 2 patients in new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system: Impact on waitlist and posttransplant outcomes.新的器官共享联合网络分配系统中 2 级状态患者等待时间的增加:对等候名单和移植后结果的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;167(2):535-543.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.040. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Impact of heart transplant allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes among listing strategies.心脏移植分配变更对不同列入名单策略的候补名单竞争结局的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Jul;35(7):e14345. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14345. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
10
Analysis of the revised heart allocation policy and the influence of increased mechanical circulatory support on survival.分析修订后的心脏分配政策和机械循环支持增加对生存率的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;165(6):2090-2103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.076. Epub 2021 Dec 8.