Kruit Natalie, Rattan Nivedita, Tian David, Dieleman Stefan, Burrell Aidan, Dennis Mark
Department of Anaesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Greater Sydney Helicopter Emergency Service, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 May;37(5):748-754. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
To evaluate the available published evidence of the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
A systematic review and meta-analysis designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews an Meta-Analyses guidelines.
In the prehospital setting.
All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational trials using pre-hospital ECPR in adult patients (>17 years).
Prehospital ECPR.
The study authors searched Medline, Embase, and PUBMED for all RCTs and observational trials. The studies were assessed for clinical, methodologic, and statistical heterogeneity. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge. The study outcomes were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of means or proportions as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. Four studies were included, with a total of 222 patients receiving prehospital ECPR (mean age = 51 years [95% CI 44-57], 81% of patients were male (CI 74-87), and 60% patients had a cardiac cause for their arrest (95% CI 43-76). Overall survival at discharge was 23.4% (95% CI 15.5-33.7; I = 62%). The pooled low-flow time was 61.1 minutes (95% CI 45.2-77.0; I = 97%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be low, and the overall risk of bias was assessed to be serious, with confounding being the primary source of bias.
No definitive conclusions can be made as to the efficacy of prehospital ECPR in refractory cardiac arrest. Higher quality evidence is required.
评估院外环境下体外心肺复苏(ECPR)对院外心脏骤停患者临床结局影响的现有已发表证据。
根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行的系统评价和Meta分析。
院外环境。
所有在成年患者(>17岁)中使用院前ECPR的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性试验。
院前ECPR。
研究作者检索了Medline、Embase和PUBMED数据库,以查找所有RCT和观察性试验。对这些研究进行临床、方法学和统计学异质性评估。主要结局是出院时存活。根据均值或比例的随机效应Meta分析,酌情汇总研究结果。采用推荐意见评估、制定与评价方法对证据质量进行评估。纳入了4项研究,共有222例患者接受了院前ECPR(平均年龄=51岁[95%CI 44 - 57],81%的患者为男性(CI 74 - 87),60%的患者心脏骤停原因明确(95%CI 43 - 76)。出院时的总体生存率为23.4%(95%CI 15.5 - 33.7;I² = 62%)。汇总的低流量时间为61.1分钟(95%CI 45.2 - 77.0;I² = 97%)。证据质量被评估为低,总体偏倚风险被评估为严重,混杂是偏倚的主要来源。
对于院前ECPR在难治性心脏骤停中的疗效,无法得出明确结论。需要更高质量的证据。