Suppr超能文献

从直接口服因子Xa抑制剂转换为静脉注射普通肝素后达到治疗范围的时间评估

An Evaluation of Time to Therapeutic Range of Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin After Transitioning From Direct Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors.

作者信息

Lawing Lindsey, Yook Jae, Ray Marianne, Smith Susan Elizabeth

机构信息

Piedmont Healthcare Inc., Athens, GA, USA.

University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2023 Feb;58(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/00185787221133713. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Abstract

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (Xa inhibitor) may falsely elevate anti-Xa assays, creating a challenge when patients transition from Xa inhibitors to intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH). This study compared the time to therapeutic anti-Xa range in patients transitioning from Xa inhibitors to IV UFH to those not previously anticoagulated and initiated on IV UFH. This single-center, retrospective study included adults receiving IV UFH from August 2018 through August 2019. The study group received apixaban or rivaroxaban prior to the initiation of IV UFH, and the control group was not previously anticoagulated. The primary outcome was the time to reach therapeutic range. Secondary outcomes included the number of anti-Xa levels drawn to reach therapeutic range, incidence of treatment failure, and incidence of major bleeding episodes. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. The time to reach therapeutic range was a median of 18.5 hours in the study group (IQR 14.9-26.9) compared to 7.3 hours (IQR 5.9-14.7) in the control group ( < .001). Two anti-Xa levels were drawn in the study group (IQR 1-4) compared to 1 (IQR 1-2) in the control group ( < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failures ( = .981) or major bleeding episodes ( = .972). In patients transitioning from Xa inhibitors to IV UFH, the time to therapeutic range was longer and required additional laboratory tests compared to those not previously anticoagulated. Further research is needed to examine the incidence of treatment failures or major bleeding episodes.

摘要

直接口服Xa因子抑制剂(Xa抑制剂)可能会错误地升高抗Xa检测值,这在患者从Xa抑制剂转换为静脉注射普通肝素(IV UFH)时带来了挑战。本研究比较了从Xa抑制剂转换为IV UFH的患者与未接受过抗凝治疗且开始使用IV UFH的患者达到治疗性抗Xa范围的时间。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2018年8月至2019年8月期间接受IV UFH治疗的成年人。研究组在开始使用IV UFH之前接受了阿哌沙班或利伐沙班治疗,对照组之前未接受过抗凝治疗。主要结局是达到治疗范围的时间。次要结局包括为达到治疗范围所进行的抗Xa水平检测次数、治疗失败的发生率以及大出血事件的发生率。分类数据和连续数据分别采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验进行分析。研究组达到治疗范围的时间中位数为18.5小时(四分位间距14.9 - 26.9),而对照组为7.3小时(四分位间距5.9 - 14.7)(<0.001)。研究组进行了2次抗Xa水平检测(四分位间距1 - 4),而对照组为1次(四分位间距1 - 2)(<0.001)。治疗失败的发生率(=0.981)或大出血事件的发生率(=0.972)没有差异。在从Xa抑制剂转换为IV UFH的患者中,与未接受过抗凝治疗的患者相比,达到治疗范围的时间更长,且需要额外的实验室检测。需要进一步研究以检查治疗失败或大出血事件的发生率。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.门诊口服抗凝剂使用的全国趋势。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1300-5.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.044. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验