Isla Dolores, Lopez-Brea Marta, Espinosa María, Arrabal Natalia, Pérez-Parente Diego, Carcedo David, Bernabé-Caro Reyes
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jan 16;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z.
Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study.
A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept'18 and Feb'20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results.
Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept'18 cut-off and - 0.80 and - 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb'20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ - 54,261 with Sept'18 cut-off and € - 81,907 with Feb'20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results.
The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain.
基于IMpower110试验,阿替利珠单抗最近被批准用于一线治疗高PD-L1表达、无EGFR或ALK突变的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。本研究旨在根据IMpower110研究的两个截点结果,评估在西班牙环境下,阿替利珠单抗与帕博利珠单抗相比在这些患者中的成本效益。
采用三状态分区生存模型来适应西班牙环境,以计算终身健康结果和成本。阿替利珠单抗的临床数据来自IMpower110试验的中期和探索性结果(数据截点分别为2018年9月和2020年2月),同时使用网络荟萃分析来模拟帕博利珠单抗治疗。效用数据从试验中收集。基于专家确定的资源考虑直接医疗成本。成本和结果按每年3%进行贴现。健康结果以每生命年(LY)成本和每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本表示。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。
在终身范围内,增量结果表明,阿替利珠单抗产生的健康结果(LYs和QALYs)与帕博利珠单抗相似,根据所使用的截点差异最小(2018年9月截点时为+0.70和+0.42 LYs及QALYs,2020年2月截点时为-0.80和-0.72 LYs及QALYs)。然而,对于两个截点,阿替利珠单抗产生的成本均显著低于帕博利珠单抗(2018年9月截点时为-54,261欧元,2020年2月截点时为-81,907欧元)。进行的敏感性分析证实了基础病例结果的稳健性。
比较IMpower110的两个截点的成本效益分析表明,在西班牙,对于转移性NSCLC患者的一线治疗,阿替利珠单抗与帕博利珠单抗的健康获益相似,但成本更低。