Bouferraa Youssef, Haibe Yolla, Hamdan Hanan, Mahfouz Rami, Chakhachiro Zaher, Shamseddine Ali
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Hematol Rep. 2023 Jan 4;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.3390/hematolrep15010002.
While most cases of thrombotic microangiopathic hemolytic anemias are idiopathic, some can occur in the setting of a malignancy. Differentiating both conditions is crucial to initiate the appropriate treatment. In this case report and literature review, we discuss the occurrence of a thrombotic microangiopathy in a 61-year-old male patient with a treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer invading his bone marrow. Plasmapheresis does not constitute the mainstay of treatment in this setting, as targeting the primary disease is the ultimate management. Treating the condition of our patient has been challenging as multiple lines of treatments of his primary disease had been exhausted. The discrepancy in KRAs status obtained between PCR and later NGS offered a new treatment line with Cetuximab. In this article, we will discuss the different factors that differentiate between idiopathic and cancer-induced microangiopathy. We will emphasize on the fact that the treatment of the primary disease constitutes the most important step in the treatment of cancer-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. We will also raise several explanations to target the disagreement in KRAS status obtained by the different technical modalities.
虽然大多数血栓性微血管病性溶血性贫血病例是特发性的,但有些病例可发生在恶性肿瘤的背景下。区分这两种情况对于启动适当的治疗至关重要。在本病例报告和文献综述中,我们讨论了一名61岁男性患者的血栓性微血管病,该患者患有难治性转移性结直肠癌并侵犯其骨髓。在这种情况下,血浆置换并非主要治疗方法,因为针对原发性疾病才是最终的治疗手段。由于患者原发性疾病的多种治疗方案均已用尽,治疗该患者的病情具有挑战性。PCR和后来的NGS检测得到的KRAs状态差异为使用西妥昔单抗提供了新的治疗方案。在本文中,我们将讨论区分特发性和癌症诱发的微血管病的不同因素。我们将强调原发性疾病的治疗是癌症诱发的血栓性微血管病治疗中最重要的步骤这一事实。我们还将提出几种解释,以针对不同技术方法获得的KRAS状态不一致的情况。