• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展职业共同体量表:归属感为基础的社会联系对老年护理劳动力的工作投入、自我效能感和积极情绪至关重要。

Developing the Occupational Communion Scale: Belonging-Based Social Connections Are Vital for Work Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Positive Affect in Aged Care Workforces.

机构信息

Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2023 Jul 18;63(6):1028-1038. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac190.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnac190
PMID:36652299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10353045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A multifaceted construct called occupational communion (OC), defined as a sense of belonging based on social interaction at work, has been proposed to understand why care workers were positively engaged in their jobs over time, even though they were very demanding. Rich qualitative data on the multiple aspects of OC in care work exist, but a valid measure does not.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We applied a mixed-method systematic scale development process to measure OC. Aged and dementia care workers in Australia (76%) and other countries participated in a focus group and online surveys (N = 2,451). We also used interview data from our prior study. The study involved 3 components: (1) scale development and design; (2) pilot test validation with exploratory factor analysis; and (3) confirmatory validation via confirmatory factor analysis. The third component assessed convergent and discriminant validity using measures of communion, self-efficacy, work engagement, job and life satisfaction, intention to leave, positive and negative affect, and mood.

RESULTS

We developed a 28-item Occupational Communion Scale (OCS) with good internal consistency (composite reliability = 0.75-0.91) across 6 factors: (1) "natural" carer, (2) psychological need to care, (3) connection with clients, (4) connection with coworkers, (5) desire for more connection, and (6) blurred boundaries. All validity measures correlated with OC and work engagement, self-efficacy, and positive affect showed the strongest association.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The OCS can be used to design and evaluate interventions addressing aged care workforce engagement, social connections and well-being, and care outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

职业共融(OC)是一个多方面的概念,定义为基于工作中的社会互动而产生的归属感,它被提出是为了理解为什么护理人员在工作中即使面临巨大的压力,也能长期保持积极的工作态度。关于护理工作中 OC 的多个方面存在丰富的定性数据,但缺乏有效的衡量标准。

研究设计与方法

我们应用混合方法系统量表开发过程来衡量 OC。澳大利亚(76%)和其他国家的老年和痴呆症护理人员参与了焦点小组和在线调查(N=2451)。我们还使用了我们之前研究的访谈数据。该研究包括 3 个部分:(1)量表的开发和设计;(2)通过探索性因素分析进行试点验证;(3)通过验证性因素分析进行确认性验证。第 3 部分使用共融、自我效能、工作投入、工作和生活满意度、离职意向、积极和消极情绪以及情绪等衡量标准评估收敛和区别效度。

结果

我们开发了一个 28 项的职业共融量表(OCS),在 6 个因素上具有良好的内部一致性(综合可靠性=0.75-0.91):(1)“自然”护理者,(2)护理的心理需求,(3)与客户的联系,(4)与同事的联系,(5)更多联系的愿望,以及(6)模糊的界限。所有有效性衡量标准与 OC 和工作投入、自我效能和积极情绪相关,与后者的关联最强。

讨论与启示

OCS 可用于设计和评估干预措施,以解决老年护理人员的工作投入、社会联系和幸福感以及护理结果问题。

相似文献

1
Developing the Occupational Communion Scale: Belonging-Based Social Connections Are Vital for Work Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Positive Affect in Aged Care Workforces.发展职业共同体量表:归属感为基础的社会联系对老年护理劳动力的工作投入、自我效能感和积极情绪至关重要。
Gerontologist. 2023 Jul 18;63(6):1028-1038. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac190.
2
Perspectives of the community-based dementia care workforce: "occupational communion" a key finding from the Work 4 Dementia Project.基于社区的痴呆症护理人员的观点:“职业共同体”是“工作 4 痴呆症项目”的一项重要发现。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 May;25(5):765-74. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002323. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
The adult carer quality of life questionnaire (AC-QoL): comparison with measures of burden and well-being, and Italian validation.成人照顾者生活质量问卷(AC-QoL):与负担和幸福感测量的比较,以及意大利验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1207-1216. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1423519. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
4
Measuring cancer caregiver health literacy: Validation of the Health Literacy of Caregivers Scale-Cancer (HLCS-C) in an Australian population.测量癌症护理者的健康素养:澳大利亚人群中护理者健康素养量表-癌症版(HLCS-C)的验证
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):330-344. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12524. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Work Engagement in South Korea.韩国的工作投入度。
Psychol Rep. 2017 Jun;120(3):561-578. doi: 10.1177/0033294117697085. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
Psychometric Characteristics of the Hebrew Version of the Professional Quality-of-Life Scale.《职业生活质量量表希伯来语版的心理测量学特征》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):575-581.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Positive Aspects of Caregiving Questionnaire.照顾问卷的积极方面。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):77-83. doi: 10.1177/0891988716686831. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Mealtime Engagement Scale in Direct Care Providers of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.发展和心理计量测试的用餐时间参与量表直接护理提供者养老院居民的痴呆症。
Gerontologist. 2021 Nov 15;61(8):e410-e420. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa097.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil).工作韧性量表(RAW 量表-巴西)的心理计量学评估。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Feb 25;75(3):e20210241. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0241. eCollection 2022.
10
Australian occupational therapy academic workforce: An examination of retention, work-engagement, and role overload issues.澳大利亚作业治疗学术人员队伍:对保留、工作投入和角色超载问题的考察。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2023 May;30(4):452-462. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1958002. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation Guided by Short Video Apps on Policemen's Mindfulness, Public Service Motivation, Conflict Resolution Skills, and Communication Skills.短视频应用引导的慈爱冥想对警察正念、公共服务动机、冲突解决能力和沟通能力的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;15(7):909. doi: 10.3390/bs15070909.

本文引用的文献

1
Workforce Issues in Long-Term Care: Is There Hope for a Better Way Forward?长期护理中的劳动力问题:是否有更好的前进之路?
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):483-486. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab040.
2
Maximizing Home Health Aide Retention: The Impact of Control and Support on the Job.最大限度提高家庭健康助手的留用率:控制和支持对工作的影响。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):517-529. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab003.
3
Not Just How Many but Who Is on Shift: The Impact of Workplace Incivility and Bullying on Care Delivery in Nursing Homes.不仅关乎轮班人数,更关乎轮班人员:工作场所的无礼和欺凌对养老院护理服务的影响。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):563-572. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa203.
4
Deeply Discrediting: A Systematic Review Examining the Conceptualizations and Consequences of the Stigma of Working in Aged Care.深度诋毁:一项系统评价,审视老年护理工作污名化的概念化和后果。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):e129-e146. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa166.
5
Comparing Occupational Adaptation-Based and Traditional Training Programs for Dementia Care Teams: An Embedded Mixed-Methods Study.基于职业适应的痴呆症护理团队培训计划与传统培训计划的比较:一项嵌入式混合方法研究。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):582-594. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa160.
6
Care workers' perspectives of factors affecting a sustainable aged care workforce.照顾者对影响老年护理人员可持续性的因素的看法。
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Mar;68(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/inr.12635. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
It Is Time to Resolve the Direct Care Workforce Crisis in Long-Term Care.是时候解决长期护理中的直接护理人员危机了。
Gerontologist. 2021 Jun 2;61(4):497-504. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa116.
8
A roadmap to advance dementia research in prevention, diagnosis, intervention, and care by 2025.到 2025 年推进痴呆症预防、诊断、干预和护理研究的路线图。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;33(7):900-906. doi: 10.1002/gps.4868. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Communal motivation and well-being in interpersonal relationships: An integrative review and meta-analysis.人际关系中的社交动机和幸福感:综合回顾和荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jan;144(1):1-25. doi: 10.1037/bul0000133. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Work-related change in residential elderly care: Trust, space and connectedness.老年居家护理中与工作相关的变化:信任、空间与联系
Hum Relat. 2017 Jul;70(7):805-835. doi: 10.1177/0018726716684199. Epub 2017 Feb 10.