Suppr超能文献

欧洲早产儿输血实践调查。

Survey of transfusion practices in preterm infants in Europe.

机构信息

Newborn Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Neonatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Jul;108(4):360-366. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324619. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants commonly receive red blood cell (RBC), platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions. The aim of this Neonatal Transfusion Network survey was to describe current transfusion practices in Europe and to compare our findings to three recent randomised controlled trials to understand how clinical practice relates to the trial data.

METHODS

From October to December 2020, we performed an online survey among 597 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) caring for infants with a gestational age (GA) of <32 weeks in 18 European countries.

RESULTS

Responses from 343 NICUs (response rate: 57%) are presented and showed substantial variation in clinical practice. For RBC transfusions, 70% of NICUs transfused at thresholds above the restrictive thresholds tested in the recent trials and 22% below the restrictive thresholds. For platelet transfusions, 57% of NICUs transfused at platelet count thresholds above 25×10/L in non-bleeding infants of GA of <28 weeks, while the 25×10/L threshold was associated with a lower risk of harm in a recent trial. FFP transfusions were administered for coagulopathy without active bleeding in 39% and for hypotension in 25% of NICUs. Transfusion volume, duration and rate varied by factors up to several folds between NICUs.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfusion thresholds and aspects of administration vary widely across European NICUs. In general, transfusion thresholds used tend to be more liberal compared with data from recent trials supporting the use of more restrictive thresholds. Further research is needed to identify the barriers and enablers to incorporation of recent trial findings into neonatal transfusion practice.

摘要

背景

早产儿通常需要输注红细胞(RBC)、血小板和新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)。本新生儿输血网络调查的目的是描述欧洲目前的输血实践,并将我们的发现与最近的三项随机对照试验进行比较,以了解临床实践与试验数据的关系。

方法

2020 年 10 月至 12 月,我们对 18 个欧洲国家中 597 个收治胎龄(GA)<32 周的婴儿的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行了在线调查。

结果

展示了 343 个 NICU(应答率:57%)的应答情况,显示出临床实践存在很大差异。对于 RBC 输血,70%的 NICU 采用了高于最近试验中测试的限制性阈值的阈值进行输血,而 22%的 NICU 采用了低于限制性阈值的阈值进行输血。对于血小板输血,57%的 NICU 在胎龄<28 周的非出血婴儿血小板计数>25×10/L 时输注血小板,而在最近的一项试验中,25×10/L 的阈值与降低危害风险相关。39%的 NICU 在没有活动性出血的情况下因凝血障碍而输注 FFP,25%的 NICU 因低血压而输注 FFP。NICU 之间的输血量、持续时间和速度差异高达数倍。

结论

欧洲 NICU 之间输血阈值和管理方面存在很大差异。总体而言,与支持采用更严格阈值的最近试验数据相比,使用的输血阈值往往更为宽松。需要进一步研究以确定将最近试验结果纳入新生儿输血实践的障碍和促进因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/857c/10314003/e75adb39d0f7/fetalneonatal-2022-324619f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验