• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 HyperArc 计划减少原发性脑肿瘤术后放疗中海马的剂量。

Dose reduction of hippocampus using HyperArc planning in postoperative radiotherapy for primary brain tumors.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2023;48(2):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.12.001. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2022.12.001
PMID:36653285
Abstract

To compare dosimetric parameters for the hippocampus, organs at risk (OARs), and targets of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), noncoplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT), and HyperArc (HA) plans in patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy for primary brain tumors. For 20 patients, HA plans were generated to deliver 40.05 to 60 Gy for the planning target volume (PTV). In addition, doses for the hippocampus and OARs were minimized. The VMAT and NC-VMAT plans were retrospectively generated using the same optimization parameters as those in the HA plans. For the hippocampus, the equivalent dose to be administered in 2 Gy fractions (EQD) was calculated assuming α/β = 2. Dosimetric parameters for the PTV, hippocampus, and OARs in the VMAT, NC-VMAT, and HA plans were compared. For PTV, the HA plans provided significantly lower D and D than the VMAT and NC-VMAT plans (p < 0.05), whereas the D and D were significantly higher (p < 0.05). For the contralateral hippocampus, the dosimetric parameters in the HA plans (8.1 ± 9.6, 6.5 ± 7.2, 5.6 ± 5.8, and 4.8 ± 4.7 Gy for D, D, D and D, respectively) were significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than those in the VMAT and NC-VMAT plans. Except for the optic chiasm, the D in the HA plans (brainstem, lens, optic nerves, and retinas) was the smallest (p < 0.05). In addition, the doses in the HA plans for the brain and skin were the smallest (p < 0.05) among the 3 plans. HA planning, instead of coplanar and noncoplanar VMAT, significantly reduces the dosage to which the contralateral hippocampus as well as other OARs are exposed without compromising on target coverage.

摘要

比较原发性脑肿瘤术后放疗患者的 hippocampus、器官危及器官 (OARs) 和容积调强弧形治疗 (VMAT)、非共面 VMAT (NC-VMAT) 和 HyperArc (HA) 计划的剂量学参数。为 20 名患者生成 HA 计划,以对计划靶区 (PTV) 给予 40.05 至 60 Gy。此外,还最小化了 hippocampus 和 OAR 的剂量。使用与 HA 计划相同的优化参数,回顾性生成了 VMAT 和 NC-VMAT 计划。对于 hippocampus,假设 α/β = 2,计算以 2 Gy 分数给予的等效剂量 (EQD)。比较 VMAT、NC-VMAT 和 HA 计划的 PTV、hippocampus 和 OAR 的剂量学参数。对于 PTV,HA 计划提供的 D 和 D 明显低于 VMAT 和 NC-VMAT 计划 (p < 0.05),而 D 和 D 明显更高 (p < 0.05)。对于对侧 hippocampus,HA 计划中的剂量学参数 (D、D、D 和 D 分别为 8.1 ± 9.6、6.5 ± 7.2、5.6 ± 5.8 和 4.8 ± 4.7 Gy) 明显更小 (p < 0.05) VMAT 和 NC-VMAT 计划。除了视交叉外,HA 计划中的 D (脑干、晶状体、视神经和视网膜) 最小 (p < 0.05)。此外,HA 计划中的脑和皮肤剂量在 3 个计划中最小 (p < 0.05)。与共面和非共面 VMAT 相比,HA 计划可显著降低对侧 hippocampus 以及其他 OAR 暴露的剂量,同时不影响靶区覆盖。

相似文献

1
Dose reduction of hippocampus using HyperArc planning in postoperative radiotherapy for primary brain tumors.使用 HyperArc 计划减少原发性脑肿瘤术后放疗中海马的剂量。
Med Dosim. 2023;48(2):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.12.001. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
Automated Non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Maxillary Sinus Carcinoma.上颌窦癌的自动化非共面容积调强弧形治疗计划。
In Vivo. 2023 Jan-Feb;37(1):417-423. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13094.
3
Dosimetric potential of knowledge-based planning model trained with HyperArc plans for brain metastases.基于 HyperArc 计划训练的知识型计划模型在脑转移瘤中的剂量学潜力。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Feb;24(2):e13836. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13836. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique.基于直线加速器的 VMAT 立体定向放射手术治疗多个脑病变:常规多等中心方法与新专用单等中心技术的比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 5;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0985-2.
5
Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs.比较临近关键器官的高级别胶质瘤肿瘤的多种治疗计划技术。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(9):514-519. doi: 10.1159/000487642. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing using Varian HyperArc.瓦里安 HyperArc 技术行全脑放疗联合海马保护
Med Dosim. 2021;46(3):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Improvement of target coverage using automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in stereotactic radiotherapy for cervical metastatic spinal tumors.在颈椎转移性脊柱肿瘤的立体定向放射治疗中,使用自动非共面容积调强弧形放疗计划改善靶区覆盖。
Med Dosim. 2023;48(3):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
Non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniopharyngiomas reduces radiation doses to the bilateral hippocampus: a planning study comparing dynamic conformal arc therapy, coplanar VMAT, and non-coplanar VMAT.颅咽管瘤的非共面容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)可降低双侧海马体的辐射剂量:一项比较动态适形弧形放疗、共面VMAT和非共面VMAT的计划研究
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jun 23;11:86. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0659-x.
9
Assessment of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT).评估容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)在海马回避全脑放射治疗(HA-WBRT)中的多标准优化(MCO)。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Mar;19(2):184-190. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12277. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Coplanar versus noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for fronto-temporal high-grade glioma.共面与非共面调强放疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)治疗计划在额颞高级别胶质瘤中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Jul 5;13(4):3826. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3826.

引用本文的文献

1
A Dosimetric Comparison of HyperArc Therapy Planning and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme.针对多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者,HyperArc治疗计划与容积调强弧形治疗计划的剂量学比较
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1009-1021. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13906.