National Institute for Health Research, Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Eye (Lond). 2023 Aug;37(12):2527-2534. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02367-x. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: DRAKO (NCT02850263) was a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-centre cohort study enrolling patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) including central involvement. The study evaluated UK standard-of-care intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment. This analysis describes the treatment pathway and service provision for the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment-naïve (C1) and non-naïve patients (C2) who received prior anti-VEGF treatment for DMO other than IVT-AFL.
Mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness were measured and stratified by baseline factors, including ethnicity and administration of five initial monthly injections within predefined windows. Clinic visits were classified as treatment only (T1), monitoring assessment only (T2), combined visits (T3) or post-injection visits with no treatment or assessment (T4).
Median time from decision to treat to treatment was 6 days. As a percentage of total visits, T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 7%, 42%, 48% and 3% for C1 and 11%, 39%, 48% and 2% for C2. Most IVT-AFL injections were administered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than doctors (C1, 57.4%; C2, 58.5%). The percentage of treatments associated with a procedure-related adverse event where at least 75% of injections were completed by the same injector role were similar for doctors and other HCPs (C1, 1.1% and 0.8%; C2, 0.7%, and 1.0%).
Results indicate that upon DMO diagnosis, patients were treated promptly, and most visits were combined (treatment and assessment) or monitoring only. Most IVT-AFL was administered by non-physicians with a similar treatment-related safety profile as IVT-AFL administered by physicians.
背景/目的:DRAKO(NCT02850263)是一项为期 24 个月的前瞻性、非干预性、多中心队列研究,纳入了包括中央受累在内的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)患者。该研究评估了英国标准的玻璃体腔内阿柏西普(IVT-AFL)治疗。本分析描述了接受除 IVT-AFL 以外的其他抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的抗 VEGF 治疗初治(C1)和非初治(C2)患者的抗 VEGF 治疗途径和服务提供情况。
测量了最佳矫正视力和中央视网膜厚度的平均变化,并按基线因素分层,包括种族和在预定义窗口内接受五次初始每月注射的情况。就诊被分为仅治疗(T1)、仅监测评估(T2)、联合就诊(T3)或注射后无治疗或评估的就诊(T4)。
从决定治疗到开始治疗的中位时间为 6 天。C1 的 T1、T2、T3 和 T4 就诊占总就诊的比例分别为 7%、42%、48%和 3%,C2 的 T1、T2、T3 和 T4 就诊占总就诊的比例分别为 11%、39%、48%和 2%。大多数 IVT-AFL 注射由医生以外的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行(C1,57.4%;C2,58.5%)。与至少 75%的注射由同一注射者完成的程序相关不良事件相关的治疗比例在医生和其他 HCP 之间相似(C1,1.1%和 0.8%;C2,0.7%和 1.0%)。
结果表明,在 DMO 诊断后,患者得到了及时治疗,大多数就诊是联合(治疗和评估)或仅监测。大多数 IVT-AFL 由非医师管理,与医师管理的 IVT-AFL 具有相似的治疗相关安全性。