Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 19;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01968-z.
Multimorbidity is posing an enormous burden to health systems, especially for primary healthcare system. While primary care teams (PCTs) are believed to have potentials to improve quality of primary health care (PHC), less is known about their impact on the quality of care for people with multimorbidity. We assessed the characteristics of PCTs and their impact on the quality of care for people with multimorbidity and the mechanisms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest for published studies from January 2000 to October 2021 for studies in English. Following through PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers independently abstracted data and reconciled by consensus with a third reviewer. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were evaluated to identify relevant studies. Studies were categorized by types of interventions, the impact of interventions on outcome measures, and mechanisms of interventions. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (13 RCT, 3 cohort studies, and 1 non-randomized trial) were identified. PCTs were summarized into three types-upward PCTs, downward PCTs and traditional PCTs according to the skill mix. The upward PCTs included primary care workers and specialists from upper-level hospitals, downward PCTs involving primary care workers and lay health workers, and traditional PCTs involving physicians and care managers. PCTs improved patients' mental and psychological health outcomes greatly, and also improved patients' perceptions towards care including satisfaction with care, sense of improvement, and patient-centeredness. PCTs also improved the process of care and changed providers' behaviors. However, PCTs showed mixed effects on clinical outcome measures.
PCTs have improved mental and psychological health outcomes, the process of care, patients' care experiences, and satisfaction towards care for patients with multimorbidity. The effect of PCTs on clinical outcomes and changes in patient behaviors need to be further explored.
多种疾病给卫生系统带来了巨大负担,尤其是对初级医疗保健系统。虽然初级保健团队(PCT)被认为有潜力提高初级卫生保健的质量,但对于他们对多种疾病患者的护理质量的影响知之甚少。我们评估了 PCT 的特征及其对多种疾病患者护理质量的影响及其机制。
我们检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月期间发表的英文研究的 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 ProQuest。按照 PRISMA 指南,两名评审员独立提取数据,并通过共识与第三名评审员进行协调。评估标题、摘要和全文以确定相关研究。研究根据干预类型、干预对结果测量的影响以及干预机制进行分类。
确定了 17 项研究(13 项 RCT、3 项队列研究和 1 项非随机试验)。根据技能组合,将 PCT 总结为三种类型:向上 PCT、向下 PCT 和传统 PCT。向上 PCT 包括基层医疗工作者和上级医院的专家,向下 PCT 涉及基层医疗工作者和基层卫生工作者,传统 PCT 涉及医生和护理经理。PCT 大大改善了患者的心理和心理健康结果,也改善了患者对护理的认知,包括对护理的满意度、改善感和以患者为中心。PCT 还改善了护理过程并改变了提供者的行为。然而,PCT 对临床结果测量的影响不一。
PCT 改善了多种疾病患者的心理健康结果、护理过程、患者的护理体验和对护理的满意度。需要进一步探讨 PCT 对临床结果和患者行为改变的影响。