Suppr超能文献

Evaluation of eight methods for estimating creatinine clearance in men.

作者信息

Rhodes P J, Rhodes R S, McClelland G H, Culbertson V L, Jahnigen D W, Bloedow D C

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1987 May;6(5):399-406.

PMID:3665391
Abstract

Eight methods for estimating creatinine clearance (CLcr) were compared in 65 men with serum creatinine concentrations (SCr) less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL (group 1) and 65 men with SCr greater than 1.5 mg/dL (group 2). All patients had SCr values that did not fluctuate by more than +/- 10% for two weeks before and two weeks after measurement of CLcr. For each patient, predictions of CLcr by each of eight currently used formulas were compared with measured CLcr values; both regression analysis and predictive error analysis were used. Group 1 patients ranged in age from 32 to 64 years (mean, 53), weighed from 48 to 105 kg (mean, 73), and were from 63 to 79 inches in height (mean, 69). Group 2 patients ranged from 26 to 63 years of age (mean, 53), weighed from 34 to 141 kg (mean, 80), and were from 63 to 76 inches in height (mean, 70). Measured CLcr values ranged from 29.8 to 197 mL/min in group 1 and from 2.8 to 118 mL/min in group 2. Ranges of SCr values were 0.7-1.5 mg/dL (mean, 1.1) in group 1 and 1.6-7.1 mg/dL (mean, 2.8) in group 2; the formula of Cockcroft and Gault, which uses age, body weight, and SCr, had the highest correlation and the greatest accuracy in group 1, whereas the formula of Jelliffe, which uses body surface area and SCr, had the highest correlation and the greatest accuracy in group 2. Estimation of creatinine clearance can be improved by identification and use of the formula that is best suited to a specific patient population.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验