• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未公开的性风险暴露:德国全血捐献者全国性合规研究结果

Undisclosed Sexual Risk Exposures: Results of a Nationwide Compliance Study among Whole Blood Donors in Germany.

作者信息

Preuβel Karina, Albrecht Stefan, Offergeld Ruth

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Jun 30;49(6):368-378. doi: 10.1159/000525007. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1159/000525007
PMID:36654976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9764329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Undisclosed sexual infection risks are the main reasons for transfusion transmissible infections in German blood donors that have qualified for donation by donor health interviews and questionnaires. Until now, data about compliance with deferral criteria were only available from post-donation interviews with infected donors, and information about the proportion of donors which did not disclose (sexual) risks at the donor health questionnaire was not available.

METHODS

A prospective nationwide anonymous online survey was conducted to investigate compliance of whole blood donors with deferral criteria for sexual infection risks. Twenty-one blood establishments which represent 80% of the regular whole blood-donor population invited all donors which donated blood during an 8-week period between January and March 2020.

RESULTS

14,882 participants completed the questionnaire. A relevant proportion of non-compliance was shown (3.0%, 95% CI: 2.7-3.3%) - with male donors being non-compliant significantly more frequently than females (3.5% vs. 2.2%, < 0.001). A quarter of the non-compliant men were MSM (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.7-1.1%). Non-compliance was strongly associated with the perception that questions about sexual risk exposures are too private. This is in line with the finding that a large proportion of donors (21%) refused to answer at least one question about sexual infection risks.

CONCLUSION

The presented data, collected for the first time, is suitable for assessing the impact of changes in the donor selection process. Donor's limited willingness to provide detailed information about sexual risk behaviour has to be kept in mind when further strategies for fair appraisal of individual sexual infection risks will be discussed.

摘要

背景

未披露的性感染风险是德国献血者输血传播感染的主要原因,这些献血者通过献血者健康访谈和问卷符合献血资格。到目前为止,关于延期标准遵守情况的数据仅来自对感染献血者的献血后访谈,而关于在献血者健康问卷中未披露(性)风险的献血者比例的信息尚不可得。

方法

进行了一项全国性的前瞻性匿名在线调查,以调查全血献血者对性感染风险延期标准的遵守情况。代表80%常规全血献血者群体的21个血液机构邀请了在2020年1月至3月的8周期间献血的所有献血者。

结果

14882名参与者完成了问卷。显示出有相当比例的不遵守情况(3.0%,95%置信区间:2.7 - 3.3%),男性献血者不遵守的频率明显高于女性(3.5%对2.2%,<0.001)。四分之一的不遵守规定的男性是男男性行为者(0.9%,95%置信区间:0.7 - 1.1%)。不遵守与认为关于性风险暴露的问题过于私密的看法密切相关。这与很大比例的献血者(21%)拒绝回答至少一个关于性感染风险的问题这一发现一致。

结论

首次收集到的这些数据适用于评估献血者选择过程变化的影响。在讨论公平评估个体性感染风险的进一步策略时,必须考虑到献血者提供性风险行为详细信息的意愿有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/18960fa6a8a6/tmh-0049-0368-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/4595a78a455b/tmh-0049-0368-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/2a6762206533/tmh-0049-0368-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/18960fa6a8a6/tmh-0049-0368-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/4595a78a455b/tmh-0049-0368-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/2a6762206533/tmh-0049-0368-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4888/9764329/18960fa6a8a6/tmh-0049-0368-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Undisclosed Sexual Risk Exposures: Results of a Nationwide Compliance Study among Whole Blood Donors in Germany.未公开的性风险暴露:德国全血捐献者全国性合规研究结果
Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Jun 30;49(6):368-378. doi: 10.1159/000525007. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Compliance of blood donors in Germany with non-sexual deferral criteria.德国献血者对非性传播疾病延期标准的遵守情况。
Vox Sang. 2024 Apr;119(4):308-314. doi: 10.1111/vox.13586. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Reported non-compliance with pre-donation screening among blood donors in Québec, Canada: A focus on the 3-month deferral for men who have sex with men.加拿大魁北克省献血者中报告的违反献血前筛查规定的情况:聚焦于对男男性行为者的3个月延期献血规定。
Vox Sang. 2022 Jul;117(7):966-970. doi: 10.1111/vox.13277. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Non-compliance to infectious disease deferral criteria among Hong Kong's blood donors.香港献血者中不符合传染病延期标准的情况。
Vox Sang. 2017 Jul;112(5):425-433. doi: 10.1111/vox.12520. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
[Single-donor (apheresis) platelets and pooled whole-blood-derived platelets--significance and assessment of both blood products].[单供体(单采)血小板与混合全血来源血小板——两种血液制品的意义及评估]
Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):S1-39. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.140210.
6
Noncompliance to blood donor selection criteria by men who have sex with men - Complidon 2017, France.男男性行为者不符合献血者选择标准 - Complidon 2017,法国。
Vox Sang. 2020 Nov;115(8):628-636. doi: 10.1111/vox.12975. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Compliance with the current 12-month deferral for male-to-male sex in Australia.在澳大利亚,遵守当前针对男男性行为的 12 个月延迟。
Vox Sang. 2014 Jan;106(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/vox.12093. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
8
Noncompliance with blood donor selection criteria - Complidon 2017, France.不遵守献血者选择标准 - Complidon 2017,法国。
Transfusion. 2020 Jan;60(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/trf.15623. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Compliance and attitudes of blood donors following transitioning from permanent to 12-month deferral of men who have sex with men in Hong Kong.香港将男男性行为者献血间隔期由永久变为 12 个月后献血者的遵嘱情况和态度。
Vox Sang. 2021 May;116(5):504-512. doi: 10.1111/vox.13025. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
10
Context and social perceptions of blood donation in donors found positive for human immunodeficiency virus in France.法国对人类免疫缺陷病毒检测呈阳性的献血者的献血背景及社会认知
Transfusion. 2017 Sep;57(9):2240-2247. doi: 10.1111/trf.14187. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Facing difficult but unavoidable choices: Donor blood safety and the deferral of men who have sex with men.面对艰难但不可避免的选择:供者血液安全与男男性行为者的暂缓。
Bioethics. 2022 Oct;36(8):840-848. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13063. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Donor screening question alternatives to men who have sex with men time deferral: Potential impact on donor deferral and discomfort.供者筛选问题替代方案对男男性行为者的时间延迟:对供者延迟和不适的潜在影响。
Transfusion. 2021 Jan;61(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/trf.16165. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Blood donation by men who have sex with men: using evidence to change policy.
男男性行为者献血:利用证据改变政策。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):260-272. doi: 10.1111/vox.13033. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Validation of a standardized donor health questionnaire across substances of human origin.针对源自人类的物质的标准化供体健康调查问卷的验证。
Vox Sang. 2021 Jul;116(6):645-655. doi: 10.1111/vox.13054. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Compliance and attitudes of blood donors following transitioning from permanent to 12-month deferral of men who have sex with men in Hong Kong.香港将男男性行为者献血间隔期由永久变为 12 个月后献血者的遵嘱情况和态度。
Vox Sang. 2021 May;116(5):504-512. doi: 10.1111/vox.13025. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Demographic and socio-economic determinants of poor HIV-risk perception at first HIV diagnosis: analysis of the HIV Surveillance data, Italy 2010-2016.人口统计学和社会经济学因素对首次 HIV 诊断时 HIV 风险感知不良的影响:对意大利 2010-2016 年 HIV 监测数据的分析。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2020 Jul-Sep;56(3):267-276. doi: 10.4415/ANN_20_03_04.
7
Noncompliance to blood donor selection criteria by men who have sex with men - Complidon 2017, France.男男性行为者不符合献血者选择标准 - Complidon 2017,法国。
Vox Sang. 2020 Nov;115(8):628-636. doi: 10.1111/vox.12975. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Evaluation and improvement of blood donor educational materials: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.献血者教育材料的评估与改进:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果
Transfusion. 2020 Aug;60(8):1756-1764. doi: 10.1111/trf.15866. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Latent class analysis of sexual health markers among men and women participating in a British probability sample survey.对参与英国概率抽样调查的男性和女性的性健康标志物进行潜在类别分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 9;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7959-7.
10
Gay and bisexual men's views on reforming blood donation policy in Canada: a qualitative study.男同性恋和双性恋者对加拿大献血政策改革的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7123-4.