Fall Abdou Khadir, Guraliuc Anda Raluca, Monfret Nicolas, Setzu Romano
MRI System Engineering Team, MICROPORT CRM, Clamart, France.
Magn Reson Med. 2023 Jun;89(6):2332-2346. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29583. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
The aim of this paper is to study the impact of pulse generator small impedance variations on the overall radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating of a cardiac rhythm management (CRM) lead in a 1.5 T MR system.
An analysis was conducted on two CRM pacing leads with different structural designs. The leads were connected to three CRM devices belonging to different technological platforms: two pacemakers and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). All pulse generators had a small (< ) RF input impedance compared to the overall system (pulse generator and lead) impedance. In addition, two Dummy load devices with an input impedance that is not negligible compared to the lead impedance were also studied. The implantable systems were studied in terms of RF deposited power at the lead electrodes, which is proportional to the RF-induced heating.
Results show that both leads behave very similarly in terms of RF deposited power for the same in-vivo tangential E-field excitation when mounting any of the pulse generators; reported differences are well below the combined uncertainty . On the other hand, both Dummy load devices resulted in a RF deposited power which differs from the other pulse generators by values larger than the combined uncertainty.
The results of our experimental analysis show that different pulse generators would not change the RF-induced heating behavior of a given lead, provided that the pulse generator impedances are small (in our study less than 5%) compared to the overall system impedance.
本文旨在研究脉冲发生器的小阻抗变化对1.5T磁共振系统中心律管理(CRM)导线整体射频(RF)感应加热的影响。
对两种结构设计不同的CRM起搏导线进行了分析。这些导线连接到属于不同技术平台的三种CRM设备:两个起搏器和一个心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)。与整个系统(脉冲发生器和导线)的阻抗相比,所有脉冲发生器的射频输入阻抗都很小(< )。此外,还研究了两种输入阻抗与导线阻抗相比不可忽略的虚拟负载设备。根据导线电极处的射频沉积功率对植入式系统进行了研究,该功率与射频感应加热成正比。
结果表明,当安装任何一个脉冲发生器时,在相同的体内切向电场激励下,两种导线在射频沉积功率方面的表现非常相似;报告的差异远低于组合不确定度 。另一方面,两种虚拟负载设备产生的射频沉积功率与其他脉冲发生器的差异大于组合不确定度。
我们的实验分析结果表明,只要脉冲发生器的阻抗与整个系统的阻抗相比很小(在我们的研究中小于5%),不同的脉冲发生器不会改变给定导线的射频感应加热行为。