Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Apr;9(2):581-590. doi: 10.1089/can.2022.0198. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Cannabidiol (CBD) has gained considerable public and scientific attention because of its known and potential medicinal properties, as well as its commercial success in a wide range of products. Although CBD lacks cannabimimetic intoxicating side effects in humans and fails to substitute for cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB1R) agonists in laboratory animal models of drug discrimination paradigm, anecdotal reports describe it as producing a "pleasant" subjective effect in humans. Thus, we speculated that this phytocannabinoid may elicit distinct subjective effects. Accordingly, we investigated whether mice would learn to discriminate CBD from vehicle. Additionally, we examined whether CBD may act as a CB1R allosteric and whether it would elevate brain endocannabinoid concentrations. C57BL/6J mice underwent discrimination training of either CBD or the high-efficacy CB1R agonist CP55,940 from vehicle. Additionally, we examined whether CBD or the CB1R-positive allosteric modulator ZCZ011 would alter the CP55,940 discriminative cue. Finally, we tested whether an acute CBD injection would elevate endocannabinoid levels in brain, and also quantified blood and brain levels of CBD. Mice failed to discriminate high doses of CBD from vehicle following 124 training days, though the same subjects subsequently acquired CP55,940 discrimination. In a second group of mice trained to discriminate CP55,940, CBD neither elicited substitution nor altered response rates. A single injection of 100 or 200 mg/kg CBD did not affect brain levels of endogenous cannabinoids and related lipids and resulted in high drug concentrations in blood and whole brain at 0.5 h and continued to increase at 3 h. CBD did not engender an interoceptive stimulus, did not disrupt performance in a food-motivated operant task, and lacked apparent effectiveness in altering brain endocannabinoid levels or modulating the pharmacological effects of a CB1R agonist. These findings support the assertions that CBD lacks abuse liability and its acute administration does not appear to play a functional role in modulating key components of the endocannabinoid system in whole animals.
大麻二酚(CBD)因其已知的和潜在的药用特性以及在广泛的产品中取得的商业成功而引起了公众和科学界的极大关注。尽管 CBD 在人类中缺乏致醉的大麻类似物作用,并且在药物辨别实验的实验室动物模型中不能替代大麻素 1 型受体(CB1R)激动剂,但传闻描述其在人类中产生“愉悦”的主观作用。因此,我们推测这种植物大麻素可能会引起不同的主观作用。因此,我们研究了小鼠是否会学会辨别 CBD 和载体。此外,我们还研究了 CBD 是否可以作为 CB1R 变构调节剂,以及是否会增加大脑内源性大麻素的浓度。 C57BL/6J 小鼠接受 CBD 或高效能 CB1R 激动剂 CP55,940 与载体的辨别训练。此外,我们还研究了 CBD 或 CB1R 阳性变构调节剂 ZCZ011 是否会改变 CP55,940 的辨别线索。最后,我们测试了单次 CBD 注射是否会增加大脑内的内源性大麻素水平,并量化了 CBD 在血液和大脑中的水平。 尽管相同的动物随后获得了 CP55,940 的辨别,但在 124 次训练日之后,小鼠未能从载体中辨别出高剂量的 CBD。在另一组接受 CP55,940 辨别训练的小鼠中,CBD 既没有引起替代作用,也没有改变反应率。单次注射 100 或 200mg/kg CBD 不会影响内源性大麻素和相关脂质的大脑水平,并且在 0.5 小时时会导致血液和全脑中的药物浓度升高,并在 3 小时时继续升高。 CBD 没有产生内感受性刺激,不会破坏食物动机操作性任务中的表现,并且在改变大脑内源性大麻素水平或调节 CB1R 激动剂的药理作用方面似乎没有明显效果。这些发现支持 CBD 缺乏滥用倾向的说法,并且其急性给药似乎不会在调节整个动物体内内源性大麻素系统的关键成分方面发挥功能作用。