• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确认性测量建模与 CompACT-15 的纵向不变性:心理灵活性的简短评估。

Confirmatory measurement modeling and longitudinal invariance of the CompACT-15: A short-form assessment of psychological flexibility.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.

Department of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2023 May;35(5):430-442. doi: 10.1037/pas0001214. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1037/pas0001214
PMID:36656724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10101904/
Abstract

The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT; Francis et al., 2016) is a recently developed measure of psychological flexibility (PF) possessing several advantages over other measures of PF, including multidimensional assessment and relative brevity. Unfortunately, previous psychometric evaluations of the CompACT have been limited by their use of exploratory factor analysis to assess dimensionality, coefficient α to assess reliability, and a lack of attention to measurement equivalence in assessing change over time. The present study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item factor analysis (IFA) to examine the dimensionality, factor-specific reliability, longitudinal measurement invariance, and construct validity of the CompACT items in a longitudinal online sample of U.S. adults ( = 523). Converging evidence across CFA and IFA confirmatory latent variable measurement models provides support for the reduction of the 23-item CompACT to a 15-item short form with a more stable factor structure, acceptable reliability over large ranges of its three latent factors, and measurement equivalence of its items in assessing latent change over time. Results also support the construct validity of the CompACT-15 items based on its relations with theoretically relevant measures. Overall, the CompACT-15 appears to be a psychometrically sound instrument with the potential to contribute to research and intervention efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

接受与承诺疗法过程综合评估(CompACT;Francis 等人,2016 年)是一种最近开发的心理灵活性(PF)测量工具,与其他 PF 测量工具相比具有几个优势,包括多维评估和相对简短。不幸的是,之前对 CompACT 的心理测量评估受到其使用探索性因素分析来评估维度、系数α来评估可靠性以及缺乏关注测量等效性以评估随时间变化的限制。本研究使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和项目因素分析(IFA)在一项美国成年人的纵向在线样本中(n = 523),检验 CompACT 项目的维度、因子特异性可靠性、纵向测量不变性和结构效度。CFA 和 IFA 验证性潜在变量测量模型的综合证据支持将 23 项 CompACT 缩减为 15 项简短形式,具有更稳定的因子结构,在其三个潜在因子的较大范围内具有可接受的可靠性,以及其项目在评估随时间的潜在变化时的测量等效性。结果还基于与理论相关措施的关系,支持 CompACT-15 项目的结构效度。总体而言,CompACT-15 似乎是一种具有心理测量学意义的可靠工具,有可能为研究和干预工作做出贡献。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/c94bf78ab664/nihms-1880044-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/57e80db8f626/nihms-1880044-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/2355a3e8ad2e/nihms-1880044-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/c94bf78ab664/nihms-1880044-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/57e80db8f626/nihms-1880044-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/2355a3e8ad2e/nihms-1880044-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f2/10101904/c94bf78ab664/nihms-1880044-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Confirmatory measurement modeling and longitudinal invariance of the CompACT-15: A short-form assessment of psychological flexibility.确认性测量建模与 CompACT-15 的纵向不变性:心理灵活性的简短评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 May;35(5):430-442. doi: 10.1037/pas0001214. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者接受和承诺疗法过程综合评估(CompACT)的跨文化有效性和可靠性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1359-1371. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03609-z. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
3
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (CompACT) in Active-Duty Military Personnel.现役军人接受与承诺疗法综合评估(CompACT)的验证性因素分析
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2022 Jul;25:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT)-Malay Version.接受和承诺疗法过程综合评估工具(CompACT)-马来语版本的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159624.
5
Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale: Greek adaptation, psychometric properties, and invariance testing across three pain samples.疼痛心理不灵活性量表的希腊语适应性、心理测量学特性及在三个疼痛样本中的不变性检验。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):895-904. doi: 10.1037/pas0000705. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Psychometric properties of the Dresden Body Image Questionnaire: A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis across sex and age in a Dutch non-clinical sample.德累斯顿身体意象问卷的心理测量特性:荷兰非临床样本中跨性别和年龄的多组验证性因素分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0181908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181908. eCollection 2017.
7
Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Tangney's Brief Self-Control Scale in Chinese Adolescents.《坦尼简短自我控制量表在中国青少年中的因子结构和纵向测量不变性》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;10:802448. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.802448. eCollection 2022.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC) Scale and Development of Its Shorter Version (S-PAC) Among Family Caregivers of Older Adults.照顾积极面量表(PAC)的有效性和可靠性及其在老年患者家庭照顾者中的更简短版本(S-PAC)的开发。
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):e75-e84. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw198.
9
Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.法国临床及非临床成年人中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量特性
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
10
Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes.一种心理灵活性测量方法的跨国适应性:接纳与承诺疗法过程的综合评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063150.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement invariance and confirmatory measurement modeling of a psychological flexibility questionnaire across Likert and Expanded response formats.一份心理灵活性问卷在李克特量表和扩展式回答格式间的测量不变性及验证性测量建模
Multivariate Behav Res. 2025;60(1):9-10. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2025.2442258. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者接受和承诺疗法过程综合评估(CompACT)的跨文化有效性和可靠性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1359-1371. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03609-z. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them.接纳与承诺疗法的过程与中介:挑战及其应对。
Behav Ther. 2023 Nov;54(6):971-988. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Turking in the time of COVID.新冠疫情时期的众包工作。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2591-2595. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01588-4. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Supporting parents of children with chronic conditions: A randomized controlled trial of web-based and self-help ACT interventions.为慢性病患儿的家长提供支持:一项基于网络和自助式接纳与承诺疗法干预措施的随机对照试验。
The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on the psychological flexibility and inflexibility of undergraduate students: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.
接纳与承诺疗法对本科生心理灵活性和僵化性的影响:一项系统综述与三级荟萃分析
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2023 Oct;30:169-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
Internet Interv. 2021 Mar 16;24:100382. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100382. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives.定义和测量“心理灵活性”:对不同灵活性和僵化结构及观点的叙述性范围综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19 adversity: Associations with distress.新冠疫情逆境下的心理灵活性:与痛苦的关联
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020 Oct;18:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.LGBTQ 人群:新冠疫情中的心理脆弱群体。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S239-S242. doi: 10.1037/tra0000837. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Inequity and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color in the United States: The need for a trauma-informed social justice response.美国种族多样性社区的不平等现象和 COVID-19 的不成比例影响:需要创伤知情的社会正义应对。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):443-445. doi: 10.1037/tra0000889. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Evaluating the Open and Engaged Components of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in an Online Self-Guided Website: Results from a Pilot Trial.在一个在线自助网站上评估接纳与承诺疗法的开放与投入成分:一项试点试验的结果。
Behav Modif. 2021 May;45(3):480-501. doi: 10.1177/0145445519878668. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy self-help intervention.接受与承诺疗法自助干预过程中压力、幸福感与心理灵活性之间的联系。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Jan-Apr;18(1):60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Identifying the Underlying Mechanisms of Change During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A Systematic Review of Contemporary Mediation Studies.识别接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)过程中改变的潜在机制:当代中介研究的系统综述
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 May;47(3):332-362. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000553. Epub 2018 Oct 4.