Suppr超能文献

后向式儿童约束系统在后部碰撞中的头部偏移。

Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.

作者信息

Patton D A, Mansfield J A, Maheshwari J, Arbogast K B

机构信息

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Injury Biomechanics Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(3):213-217. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2160631. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to quantify the head excursions of pediatric anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) seated in rearward-facing child restraint system (CRS) models during rear impact sled tests and compare to roof heights of vehicles in the current fleet to assess the possibility of head contact against the vehicle roof.

METHODS

Head excursions of ATDs seated in rearward-facing CRS models were analyzed from high-speed video data from 14 rear impact sled tests across two different series. Tests were conducted in rigidized vehicle seats from recent model year vehicles. Rearward-facing infant and convertible CRS models were tested with a variety of pediatric ATDs aged 12 months to 6 years in a variety of installation conditions (e.g., lower anchors or seat belt, anti-rotation features, etc). Maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback were compared to previously measured roof heights of 87 different vehicles.

RESULTS

The roof heights in all sedan seating positions (n = 58) and SUV/CUV/minivan seating positions (n = 60) were greater than the largest maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback (792 mm). Head contact was possible in two of the pickup trucks which had roof heights of 730 and 775 mm. In all, 98% of vehicle seating positions measured in this study would accommodate all of the maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback without contact.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of head contact against the vehicle interior roof appears low as maximum ATD head excursions in plane of the seatback were typically not great enough to reach the rooflines of the vehicles in the sample. Head contact appears possible in pickup trucks, where the window/roofline is directly behind the head restraint.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是量化在后部碰撞雪橇试验中,坐在后向式儿童约束系统(CRS)模型中的儿童人体模拟试验装置(ATD)的头部偏移,并与当前车队车辆的车顶高度进行比较,以评估头部与车辆车顶接触的可能性。

方法

从两个不同系列的14次后部碰撞雪橇试验的高速视频数据中,分析坐在后向式CRS模型中的ATD的头部偏移。试验在最近车型年车辆的刚性化座椅上进行。后向式婴儿和可转换CRS模型在各种安装条件下(例如,下部固定装置或安全带、防旋转功能等),使用年龄在12个月至6岁的各种儿科ATD进行测试。将座椅靠背平面内的最大ATD头部偏移与先前测量的87种不同车辆的车顶高度进行比较。

结果

所有轿车座位位置(n = 58)和SUV/CUV/小型货车座位位置(n = 60)的车顶高度均大于座椅靠背平面内最大的ATD头部最大偏移(792毫米)。在车顶高度分别为730毫米和775毫米的两辆皮卡中,头部有可能接触车顶。在本研究中测量的所有车辆座位位置中,98%能够容纳座椅靠背平面内所有最大的ATD头部偏移而不发生接触。

结论

由于座椅靠背平面内最大的ATD头部偏移通常不足以达到样本中车辆的车顶线,因此头部与车辆内部车顶接触的风险似乎较低。在车窗/车顶线直接位于头枕后方的皮卡中,头部似乎有可能接触车顶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验