Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, 800 S Raymond Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeosu Baek Hospital, Yeosu-Si, Jeollanam-Do, Republic of Korea.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4731-4739. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04735-4. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
Latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) tendon transfer has demonstrated better clinical outcomes compared to Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer for irreparable anterosuperior cuff (subscapularis/supraspinatus) tears; however, the biomechanical effects of these procedures are unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare kinematics and internal rotation of LDTM transfer to LD transfer for anterosuperior cuff tear.
Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested in four conditions; (1) intact, (2) anterosuperior rotator cuff tear, (3) LDTM transfer, and (4) LD transfer. Glenohumeral kinematics and internal rotation at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane were measured. Muscle loading was applied based on physiological cross-sectional area ratios with three muscle loading conditions to simulate potentially increased tension due to the advanced insertion site of the transferred tendons.
The anterosuperior rotator cuff tear leads to a significant superior shift of the humeral head compared to intact at 0° and 30° abduction (p < 0.039). Both the LDTM (p < 0.047) and LD transfers (p < 0.032) significantly shifted the humeral head inferiorly compared to the tear condition.; however, the LDTM transfer shifted the head in the anteroinferior direction compared to the LD transfer at 60° abduction and 30° ER (p < 0.045). Both LDTM and LD transfer significantly increased internal resting rotation (p < 0.008) and maximum internal rotation (p < 0.008) compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact at 30° and 60° abduction. LDTM transfer resulted in a significant internal resting rotation compared with the LD transfer at 30° abduction with double muscle loading (p = 0.02). At 0° abduction, the LDTM transfer (p < 0.027) significantly increased maximum internal rotation compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact.
Although both LDTM and LD tendon transfer improved the abnormal humeral head apex position and internal rotation compared with the tear condition, the LDTM transfer was biomechanically superior to the LD transfer in a cadaveric model.
Latissimus dorsi 和teres major(LDTM)肌腱转移在治疗不可修复的前上肩袖(肩胛下肌/冈上肌)撕裂方面比 Latissimus dorsi(LD)转移具有更好的临床效果;然而,这些手术的生物力学影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较前上肩袖撕裂的 LDTM 转移与 LD 转移的运动学和内旋。
在四个条件下测试了 8 具尸体肩部;(1)完整,(2)前上肩袖撕裂,(3)LDTM 转移,和(4)LD 转移。在肩胛平面测量盂肱关节的运动学和内旋,在 0°、30°和 60°盂肱关节外展。根据生理横截面积比施加肌肉负荷,模拟转移肌腱的先进插入部位可能导致的张力增加,施加了三种肌肉负荷条件。
与完整状态相比,前上肩袖撕裂在 0°和 30°外展时导致肱骨头明显向上移位(p<0.039)。与撕裂状态相比,LDTM(p<0.047)和 LD 转移(p<0.032)都显著地将肱骨头向下移位;然而,在 60°外展和 30°内收时,LDTM 转移将头向前后下方向移位,与 LD 转移相比(p<0.045)。与前上肩袖撕裂和完整状态相比,LDTM 和 LD 转移都显著增加了 30°和 60°外展时的休息时内旋(p<0.008)和最大内旋(p<0.008)。与 LD 转移相比,LDTM 转移在 30°外展时的双肌肉负荷下,休息时内旋显著增加(p=0.02)。在 0°外展时,与前上肩袖撕裂和完整状态相比,LDTM 转移显著增加了最大内旋(p<0.027)。
尽管 LDTM 和 LD 肌腱转移都改善了与撕裂状态相比异常的肱骨头顶点位置和内旋,但在尸体模型中,LDTM 转移在生物力学上优于 LD 转移。