Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, 800 S Raymond Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeosu Baek Hospital, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5759-5766. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04861-7. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Limitation of active Internal Rotation (IR) following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with massive Rotator Cuff Tears (mRCTs) with subscapularis insufficiency remains a challenge. Recently, RSA with Latissimus dorsi and Teres major (LDTM) transfer in patients with limited active IR has been demonstrated as a reliable treatment option. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the IR torque following LDTM transfer with RSA in mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency to RSA without tendon transfer.
Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested (mean age: 64.5 ± 1.9 years) using a custom shoulder testing system that permits loading conditions of mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency. Two conditions were tested and compared. The first condition was RSA alone and the second condition was RSA with LDTM transfer. RSA with a medialized glenoid and lateralized humerus design was used for all specimens. The specimens were tested at 0°, 20° and 40° abduction at three different muscle loads: baseline, double, and triple, while the Teres minor and deltoid loads were kept constant. IR torque was measured with a torque wrench at 0°, 20°, and 40° abduction and 60° and 45° IR positions. Force required for anterior dislocation was measured at 20° abduction and 10° IR position.
RSA with LDTM transfer had significantly higher IR torque at all abductions and muscle loading compared with RSA without transfer (average at all positions; RSA without transfer: 0.80 ± 0.02 Nm, LDTM transfer for all loads: 1.43 ± 0.10 Nm). RSA with LDTM transfer (91.4 ± 3.9 N) needed higher force for anterior dislocation compared to RSA alone (89.4 ± 4.1 N), but there was no significant difference.
LDTM transfer with RSA increases IR torque compared to RSA without tendon transfer in a cadaveric model. LDTM transfer with RSA may be a reliable treatment option for patients with mRCT and subscapularis insufficiency who are expected to have limited active IR following RSA.
在合并肩胛下肌缺损的巨大肩袖撕裂(massive Rotator Cuff Tears,mRCT)患者中,反肩关节置换术(Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty,RSA)后主动内旋(Internal Rotation,IR)受限仍然是一个挑战。最近,对于主动内旋受限的患者,RSA 联合背阔肌和大圆肌(Latissimus dorsi and Teres major,LDTM)转位已被证明是一种可靠的治疗选择。本研究的目的是从生物力学角度比较合并肩胛下肌缺损的 mRCT 患者中 RSA 联合 LDTM 转位与单纯 RSA 术后的 IR 扭矩。
使用定制的肩关节测试系统对 8 个尸体肩关节(平均年龄:64.5±1.9 岁)进行测试,该系统允许模拟合并肩胛下肌缺损的 mRCT 下的加载条件。测试并比较了两种情况。第一种情况是单纯 RSA,第二种情况是 RSA 联合 LDTM 转位。所有标本均采用内侧化肩盂和外侧化肱骨头设计的 RSA。在三个不同的肌肉负荷(基线、双负荷和三负荷)下,在 0°、20°和 40°外展位测试标本,同时保持小圆肌和三角肌的负荷不变。在 0°、20°和 40°外展位和 60°和 45°内旋位用扭矩扳手测量 IR 扭矩。在 20°外展和 10°内旋位测量前脱位所需的力。
与单纯 RSA 相比,RSA 联合 LDTM 转位在所有外展位和肌肉负荷下的 IR 扭矩均显著更高(所有位置的平均值;单纯 RSA:0.80±0.02 Nm,所有负荷下的 LDTM 转位:1.43±0.10 Nm)。与单纯 RSA 相比,RSA 联合 LDTM 转位(91.4±3.9 N)需要更大的力才能发生前脱位(89.4±4.1 N),但差异无统计学意义。
在尸体模型中,与单纯 RSA 相比,RSA 联合 LDTM 转位可增加 IR 扭矩。对于预计在 RSA 后主动内旋受限的合并肩胛下肌缺损的巨大肩袖撕裂和肩胛下肌缺损患者,RSA 联合 LDTM 转位可能是一种可靠的治疗选择。