Malawi University of Science and Technology, Ndata Farm, Thyolo, Malawi.
Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jan 19;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00882-4.
Current advances in biomedical research have introduced new ethical challenges in obtaining informed consent in low and middle-income settings. For example, there are controversies about the use of broad consent in the collection of biological samples for use in future biomedical research. However, few studies have explored preferred informed consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. Therefore, we conducted an empirical study to understand preferred consent models among key stakeholders in biomedical studies that involve collection of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. The main objective of the study was to explore views of key stakeholders on current policies on informed consent in Malawi and South Africa.
This was a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Thirty-four in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions were conducted with REC members, Funders, Policymakers, CAB members and Research Participants in Malawi and South Africa to gather their views on models of informed consent. The study was conducted in Cape Town, South Africa, and Blantyre and Lilongwe in Malawi.
Most key stakeholders preferred broad consent and tiered consent to specific consent. Some participants expressed a strong preference for specific consent to other models of informed consent in biomedical research. Few participants did not have any preference for a consent model, opting for any consent model which provides adequate information about the proposed research and what their national consent regulations require. Finally, very few participants preferred blanket consent to other informed consent models.
This study aimed to help fill the gap in the scientific literature on key stakeholder views on consent models for future use of biological samples in Malawi and South Africa. The findings of the study have provided some evidence that may support policies on permissible consent models for future use of biological samples in sub-Saharan Africa considering the differences in informed consent regulations and guidelines. Finally, the findings can inform ongoing discussions on permissible consent models to be used for future use of biological samples.
当前,生物医学研究的进展在中低收入国家获取知情同意方面带来了新的伦理挑战。例如,在为未来的生物医学研究收集生物样本时,广泛同意的使用存在争议。然而,很少有研究探讨马拉维和南非未来使用生物样本的首选知情同意模式。因此,我们进行了一项实证研究,以了解参与马拉维和南非生物医学研究中生物样本采集的主要利益相关者对未来使用生物样本的首选同意模式的看法。本研究的主要目的是探讨关键利益相关者对马拉维和南非现行知情同意政策的看法。
这是一项定性研究,包括深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。在南非开普敦以及马拉维的布兰太尔和利隆圭,对 REC 成员、资助者、政策制定者、CAB 成员和研究参与者进行了 34 次深入访谈和 6 次焦点小组讨论,以收集他们对同意模式的看法。
大多数主要利益相关者更喜欢广泛同意和分层同意,而不是具体同意。一些参与者强烈倾向于在生物医学研究中使用特定同意,而不是其他同意模式。少数参与者对同意模式没有任何偏好,而是选择任何提供有关拟议研究及其国家同意法规要求的充分信息的同意模式。最后,很少有参与者除其他同意模式外,还倾向于使用 blanket consent。
本研究旨在帮助填补马拉维和南非未来使用生物样本的主要利益相关者对同意模式看法的科学文献空白。研究结果提供了一些证据,可能支持撒哈拉以南非洲未来使用生物样本的可允许同意模式政策,考虑到知情同意法规和准则的差异。最后,研究结果可以为正在进行的关于未来使用生物样本的可允许同意模式的讨论提供信息。