Suppr超能文献

动态同意:21世纪研究网络的患者界面

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.

作者信息

Kaye Jane, Whitley Edgar A, Lund David, Morrison Michael, Teare Harriet, Melham Karen

机构信息

Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. Epub 2014 May 7.

Abstract

Biomedical research is being transformed through the application of information technologies that allow ever greater amounts of data to be shared on an unprecedented scale. However, the methods for involving participants have not kept pace with changes in research capability. In an era when information is shared digitally at the global level, mechanisms of informed consent remain static, paper-based and organised around national boundaries and legal frameworks. Dynamic consent (DC) is both a specific project and a wider concept that offers a new approach to consent; one designed to meet the needs of the twenty-first century research landscape. At the heart of DC is a personalised, digital communication interface that connects researchers and participants, placing participants at the heart of decision making. The interface facilitates two-way communication to stimulate a more engaged, informed and scientifically literate participant population where individuals can tailor and manage their own consent preferences. The technical architecture of DC includes components that can securely encrypt sensitive data and allow participant consent preferences to travel with their data and samples when they are shared with third parties. In addition to improving transparency and public trust, this system benefits researchers by streamlining recruitment and enabling more efficient participant recontact. DC has mainly been developed in biobanking contexts, but it also has potential application in other domains for a variety of purposes.

摘要

通过应用信息技术,生物医学研究正在发生变革,这些技术使前所未有的大量数据得以在前所未有的规模上共享。然而,让参与者参与研究的方法却未能跟上研究能力的变化。在一个信息在全球范围内以数字方式共享的时代,知情同意机制仍然是静态的、基于纸质的,并且围绕国界和法律框架组织。动态同意(DC)既是一个具体项目,也是一个更广泛的概念,它提供了一种新的同意方法;一种旨在满足21世纪研究格局需求的方法。DC的核心是一个个性化的数字通信界面,它将研究人员和参与者联系起来,将参与者置于决策的核心。该界面促进双向通信,以激发更积极参与、信息灵通且具备科学素养的参与者群体,在这个群体中,个人可以定制和管理自己的同意偏好。DC的技术架构包括能够对敏感数据进行安全加密的组件,并允许参与者的同意偏好随其数据和样本在与第三方共享时一同传递。除了提高透明度和公众信任外,该系统还通过简化招募流程和实现更高效的参与者重新联系,使研究人员受益。DC主要是在生物样本库背景下开发的,但它也有潜力在其他领域出于各种目的得到应用。

相似文献

1
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. Epub 2014 May 7.
2
Donor's support tool: Enabling informed secondary use of patient's biomaterial and personal data.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
3
Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9.
4
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
[The origin of informed consent].
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Enabling secure and self determined health data sharing and consent management.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 30;8(1):560. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01945-z.
4
Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1570899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899. eCollection 2025.
5
Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.
J Community Genet. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00820-4.
6
Designing Technologies for Value-based Mental Healthcare: Centering Clinicians' Perspectives on Outcomes Data Specification, Collection, and Use.
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2025 Apr-May;2025. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713481. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
8
Blockchain for Securing AI-Driven Healthcare Systems: A Systematic Review and Future Research Perspectives.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 28;17(4):e83136. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83136. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
The research relationship: participant perspectives on consent in biobanking.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 12;26(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01199-0.
10
Advancing the diagnosis of major depressive disorder: Integrating neuroimaging and machine learning.
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 19;15(3):103321. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.103321.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal health records: Consumer attitudes toward privacy and security of their personal health information.
Health Informatics J. 2011 Mar;17(1):63-71. doi: 10.1177/1460458211399403.
2
Narratives hold open the future.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;44(1 Suppl):S25-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.265.
4
Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
5
As personal genomes join big data will privacy and access shrink?
Chem Biol. 2013 Jan 24;20(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.01.008.
6
Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):321-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566.
7
Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Sep;21(9):897-902. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.282. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
8
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
The coming age of data-driven medicine: translational bioinformatics' next frontier.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e2-4. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000969.
10
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验