Suppr超能文献

单倍型相合造血干细胞移植中相关供体的作用。

The role of collateral related donors in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

作者信息

Mo Xiao-Dong, Zhang Yuan-Yuan, Zhang Xiao-Hui, Xu Lan-Ping, Wang Yu, Yan Chen-Hua, Chen Huan, Chen Yu-Hong, Chang Ying-Jun, Liu Kai-Yan, Huang Xiao-Jun

机构信息

Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100044, China.

Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100044, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing 100044, China.

出版信息

Sci Bull (Beijing). 2018 Oct 30;63(20):1376-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

Abstract

A key issue in the haploiedntical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) setting is the search for the best donor, because donor selection can significantly impact the clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify the role of collateral related donors (CRDs) in donor selection for haplo-HSCT through comparing the clinical outcomes between CRDs (n = 60) and maternal donors (MDs, n = 296), which were the last choice of donor selection in immediate related donors (IRDs). The cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease was comparable between CRDs and MDs. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 22.0% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.7%) versus 17.4% (95% CI, 13.0%-21.8%) (P = 0.455) and 25.0% (95% CI, 13.9%-36.1%) versus 23.1% (95% CI, 18.2%-28.0%) (P = 0.721) for the CRDs and MDs, respectively. The 5-year probabilities of disease-free survival and overall survival was 53.2% (95% CI, 40.4%-66.0%) versus 59.5% (95% CI, 53.8%-65.2%) (P = 0.406) and 56.5% (95% CI, 43.8%-69.2%) versus 61.8% (95% CI, 56.1%-67.5%) (P = 0.458) for the CRDs and MDs, respectively. Female donor/male recipient (FDMR) CRDs were associated with the poorest clinical outcomes, and the clinical outcomes of non-FDMR CRDs were comparable to those of MDs. In summary, our results showed that CRDs did not showed superiority over MDs. Thus, IRDs should be the first choice of donor selection, and CRDs could only be the donors for those without IRDs.

摘要

单倍体造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT)中的一个关键问题是寻找最佳供者,因为供者选择会显著影响临床结局。我们旨在通过比较旁系亲属供者(CRD,n = 60)和母亲供者(MD,n = 296)之间的临床结局,来确定CRD在haplo-HSCT供者选择中的作用,母亲供者是直系亲属供者(IRD)中供者选择的最后选项。CRD和MD之间移植物抗宿主病的累积发生率相当。CRD和MD的5年复发和非复发死亡率累积发生率分别为22.0%(95%CI,11.3%-32.7%)对17.4%(95%CI,13.0%-21.8%)(P = 0.455)和25.0%(95%CI,13.9%-36.1%)对23.1%(95%CI,18.2%-28.0%)(P = 0.721)。CRD和MD的5年无病生存率和总生存率概率分别为53.2%(95%CI,40.4%-66.0%)对59.5%(95%CI,53.8%-65.2%)(P = 0.406)和56.5%(95%CI,43.8%-69.2%)对61.8%(95%CI,56.1%-67.5%)(P = 0.458)。女性供者/男性受者(FDMR)CRD与最差的临床结局相关,非FDMR CRD的临床结局与MD相当。总之,我们的结果表明CRD并不优于MD。因此,IRD应作为供者选择的首选,CRD只能作为没有IRD的患者的供者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验