Suppr超能文献

来自HLA匹配供者和替代供者的异基因造血干细胞移植的结局:欧洲血液与骨髓移植学会登记处的回顾性分析

Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched and alternative donors: a European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Shouval Roni, Fein Joshua A, Labopin Myriam, Kröger Nicolaus, Duarte Rafael F, Bader Peter, Chabannon Christian, Kuball Jurgen, Basak Grzegorz Wladyslaw, Dufour Carlo, Galimard Jacques-Emmanuel, Polge Emmanuelle, Lankester Arjan, Montoto Silvia, Snowden John A, Styczynski Jan, Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim, Mohty Mohamad, Nagler Arnon

机构信息

Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; Dr Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2019 Nov;6(11):e573-e584. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30158-9. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of donors other than HLA-matched siblings has been a pivotal change in stem cell transplantation. We aimed to assess the evolution of outcomes within donor groups over time and explore whether donor-recipient HLA disparity might be advantageous in patients with aggressive disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicentre study, we assessed the outcomes for adult patients (≥18 years) with haematological malignancies who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between Jan 3, 2001, and Dec 31, 2015, and were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. The donor types studied were matched sibling, matched unrelated, mismatched unrelated, haploidentical, and cord blood donors. Unrelated non-cord-blood donors and recipients were typed at the allelic level for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1. We evaluated trends in overall survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, progression-free survival, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival following transplantation from various donor types (matched sibling, matched unrelated, mismatched unrelated, haploidentical, and umbilical cord blood), and compared transplantation outcomes across three epochs (epoch 1: 2001-05; epoch 2: 2006-10; and epoch 3: 2011-15). We used Kaplan-Meier estimators for survival probabilities and cumulative incidence functions accounting for competing risks for probabilities of GHVD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality, using multiple imputations by chained equations to deal with missing data. In epoch 3, we directly compared outcomes by donor group, stratified by a novel three-level disease-risk scheme.

FINDINGS

We included 106 188 patients in our analysis. The median follow-up was 4·1 years (IQR 1·7-7·7). Overall survival at 3 years increased with all donor groups between epochs 2 and 3 (matched sibling: 54·0% [95% CI 53·1-54·8] to 54·6% [53·6-55·6]; matched unrelated: 49·1% [48·0-50·2] to 51·6% [50·7-52·6]; mismatched unrelated: 37·4% [35·7-39·2] to 41·3% [39·5-43·1]; haploidentical: 34·5% [31·4-37·9] to 44·2% [42·1-46·3]; and cord blood 36·3% [33·9-39] to 43·7% [40·8-46·8]). Improvement in overall survival seems to be driven by a reduction in non-relapse mortality, except in cord blood HSCT recipients, who had a lower relapse incidence. Comparing donor groups across disease-risk strata using the novel disease-risk scheme, overall survival among recipients of matched sibling transplantations remained better than other donor groups except in high-risk disease, where overall survival with matched unrelated transplantations was not different.

INTERPRETATION

Overall survival following allogeneic stem cell transplantation is improving with substantial progress among recipients of haploidentical and cord blood HSCT. Nonetheless, the traditional donor hierarchy of matched sibling donors followed by matched unrelated donors and then other donors holds. Our findings warrant further investigation and could inform decision making and the development of donor-selection algorithms.

FUNDING

The Varda and Boaz Dotan Research Center in Haemato-Oncology, Tel Aviv University, and the Shalvi Foundation for Research.

摘要

背景

除 HLA 匹配的同胞供者外,引入其他供者是干细胞移植的一项关键变革。我们旨在评估不同供者组的预后随时间的演变情况,并探讨供者 - 受者 HLA 不相合在侵袭性疾病患者中是否可能具有优势。

方法

在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们评估了 2001 年 1 月 3 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间接受首次异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)且向欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会报告的成年(≥18 岁)血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的预后。研究的供者类型包括匹配的同胞供者、匹配的无关供者、不相合的无关供者、单倍体相合供者和脐血供者。对无关非脐血供者和受者进行 HLA - A、HLA - B、HLA - C 和 HLA - DRB1 的等位基因分型。我们评估了不同供者类型(匹配的同胞供者、匹配的无关供者、不相合的无关供者、单倍体相合供者和脐血)移植后的总生存、非复发死亡率、复发率、无进展生存、急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)以及无 GVHD 和无复发生存的趋势,并比较了三个时期(时期 1:2001 - 2005 年;时期 2:2006 - 2010 年;时期 3:2011 - 2015 年)的移植结局。我们使用 Kaplan - Meier 估计器计算生存概率,并使用累积发病率函数计算 GVHD、复发和非复发死亡率的概率,采用链式方程多重填补法处理缺失数据。在时期 3 中,我们根据一种新的三级疾病风险方案进行分层,直接比较不同供者组的结局。

结果

我们的分析纳入了 106188 例患者。中位随访时间为 4.1 年(四分位间距 1.7 - 7.7 年)。在时期 2 和时期 3 之间,所有供者组的 3 年总生存率均有所提高(匹配的同胞供者:从 54.0%[95%CI 53.1 - 54.8]提高到 54.6%[53.6 - 55.6];匹配的无关供者:从 49.1%[48.0 - 50.2]提高到 51.6%[(50.7 - 52.6];不相合的无关供者:从 37.4%[35.7 - 39.2]提高到 41.3%[(39.5 - 43.1];单倍体相合供者:从 34.5%[31.4 - 37.9]提高到 44.2%[42.1 - 46.3];脐血:从 36.3%[33.9 - 39]提高到 43.7%[40.8 - 46.8])。总生存率的提高似乎是由非复发死亡率的降低所驱动,但脐血 HSCT 受者除外,其复发率较低。使用新的疾病风险方案比较不同疾病风险分层的供者组,匹配的同胞移植受者的总生存率在除高危疾病外仍优于其他供者组,在高危疾病中,匹配的无关移植的总生存率无差异。

解读

异基因干细胞移植后的总生存率正在提高,单倍体相合和脐血 HSCT 受者取得了显著进展。尽管如此,传统的供者等级制度仍然存在,即先为匹配的同胞供者,其次是匹配的无关供者,然后是其他供者。我们的研究结果值得进一步研究,并可为决策制定和供者选择算法的开发提供参考。

资助

特拉维夫大学瓦尔达和博阿兹·多坦血液肿瘤研究中心以及沙尔维研究基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验