• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胰体尾切除术可能会低估失血量。

Blood loss in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy could be underestimated.

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Jul;30(7):962-969. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1306. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.1306
PMID:36660802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has an advantage in reducing blood loss over open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). This study was performed to investigate whether blood loss is truly reduced in LDP.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients undergoing DP from 2014 to 2022 were classified into Open and LDP groups and compared by statistical analysis. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was calculated from the perioperative changes in the hematocrit, hemoglobin, or red blood cell volume, and actual blood loss (ABL) was taken from the operative record.

RESULTS

ABL was significantly lower in the LDP than ODP group (50[5-1350] vs 335 [5-1950] ml, P < .01). However, there were no significant differences in EBL calculated from the hematocrit (406 [66-1990] vs 540 [23-1490] ml, P = .14), hemoglobin, or red blood cell volume. EBL showed more linear correlations with ABL in the ODP group (r = 0.64-0.73) than in the LDP group (r = 0.52-0.57). In the multivariate analysis for ABL, ODP (P = .02) and operative time (P < .01) were significant factors. In contrast, no significant factors were found for EBL.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative blood loss may be underestimated in LDP, and a new evaluation method needs to be established.

摘要

背景

先前的研究报告表明,腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)在减少出血量方面优于开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)。本研究旨在探讨 LDP 是否确实能减少出血量。

方法

回顾性分析 2014 年至 2022 年期间行 DP 的 113 例患者的临床资料,根据手术方式分为开腹组和腹腔镜组,采用统计学方法进行分析。通过围手术期红细胞比容、血红蛋白或红细胞体积的变化计算估计失血量(EBL),并从手术记录中获取实际失血量(ABL)。

结果

LDP 组的 ABL 明显低于 ODP 组(50[5-1350] vs 335 [5-1950] ml,P < .01)。然而,从红细胞比容(406 [66-1990] vs 540 [23-1490] ml,P = .14)、血红蛋白或红细胞体积计算的 EBL 两组间无明显差异。ODP 组 EBL 与 ABL 呈更线性相关(r = 0.64-0.73),而 LDP 组呈弱线性相关(r = 0.52-0.57)。多因素分析显示,ODP(P = .02)和手术时间(P < .01)是 ABL 的显著影响因素。而 EBL 无明显影响因素。

结论

LDP 术中出血量可能被低估,需要建立新的评估方法。

相似文献

1
Blood loss in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy could be underestimated.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术可能会低估失血量。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Jul;30(7):962-969. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1306. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
[Comparison of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].[腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术与开放性远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 23;39(10):783-786. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.10.012.
3
[Comparison of short-term clinical outcome between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy].腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与开放远端胰腺切除术短期临床结局的比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):495-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190627-00398.
4
Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis.腹腔镜和开放手术治疗左侧胰腺病变:临床结果和成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1830-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2141-z. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.
6
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:单中心经验
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017 Jun;18(6):532-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600541.
7
Comparison of open with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's transition over a 7-year period.开腹与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:单中心 7 年经验。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Feb;15(2):149-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00603.x. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
8
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.腹腔镜在 70 岁以上需行胰体尾切除术患者中的应用:一项法国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3164-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的对比:单中心病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):402-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1887-7. Epub 2011 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The conventional method of blood-loss calculation can underestimate true blood loss during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a dual-institute experience.传统的失血计算方法可能会低估腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术期间的真实失血量:一项双机构经验。
Surg Today. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03040-y.
2
Positive impact of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy on body size-corrected bleeding in obese patients.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术对肥胖患者体型校正出血的影响。
Surg Today. 2024 Dec;54(12):1461-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02865-3. Epub 2024 Jun 14.