Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
SPORT Research Group (CTS-1024), CERNEP Research Center, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):1551-1558. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004448. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Pérez-Castilla, A, Miras-Moreno, S, Weakley, J, and García-Ramos, A. Relationship between the number of repetitions in reserve and lifting velocity during the prone bench pull exercise: an alternative approach to control proximity-to-failure. J Strength Cond Res 37(8): 1551-1558, 2023-This study aimed to explore the goodness-of-fit and accuracy of both general and individual relationships between the number of repetitions in reserve (RIR) and the repetition velocity during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise. Fifteen male sports science students completed 3 sessions separated by 48-72 hours. The first session was used to determine the bench pull 1 repetition maximum (1RM). The second and third sessions were identical and consisted of 3 single sets (60, 70, and 80% 1RM) of repetitions to momentary muscular failure separated by 10 minutes during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise. General (i.e., pooling together the data from the 15 subjects) and individual RIR-velocity relationships were constructed from the data collected in the second session by pooling the data from the 3 loads (multiple-loads) or specifically for each load (load-specific). The 4 RIR-velocity relationship models were ranked by their goodness-of-fit as follows: individual load-specific ( r = 0.93) > individual multiple-loads ( r = 0.83) > general multiple-loads ( r = 0.65) > general load-specific ( r = 0.61). The accuracy when predicting the RIR in the third session based on the RIR-velocity equations obtained in the second session was acceptable and comparable for the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models (absolute errors ≤2 RIR). However, the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models significantly underestimated the RIR for ≥1 RIR and overestimated the RIR for 0 RIR. These results suggest that the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models are equally effective to quantify proximity-to-failure during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise.
佩雷斯-卡斯蒂利亚、米拉-莫雷诺、威克利和加西亚-拉莫斯研究了在史密斯机上进行俯身卧推时,储备次数与提升速度之间的关系:一种控制接近力竭的替代方法。《美国体能协会杂志》2023 年 8 月刊,37(8):1551-1558。本研究旨在探讨储备次数(RIR)与史密斯机上俯身卧推过程中重复速度之间的通用关系和个体关系的拟合优度和准确性。15 名男性运动科学专业学生在 48-72 小时内完成了 3 次试验。第一次试验用于确定卧推 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)。第二次和第三次试验相同,在史密斯机上进行 3 次单组(60%、70%和 80%1RM)至力竭的重复,每组重复之间间隔 10 分钟。通用(即汇总 15 名受试者的数据)和个体 RIR-速度关系是通过第二次试验中收集的数据构建的,这些数据来自 3 个负荷(多负荷)或特定于每个负荷(负荷特定)。这 4 个 RIR-速度关系模型根据拟合优度进行排名,如下所示:个体负荷特定( r = 0.93)>个体多负荷( r = 0.83)>通用多负荷( r = 0.65)>通用负荷特定( r = 0.61)。基于第二次试验中获得的 RIR-速度方程预测第三次试验中 RIR 的准确性可以接受,并且对于这 4 个 RIR-速度关系模型来说是相当的(绝对误差≤2RIR)。然而,这 4 个 RIR-速度关系模型显著低估了≥1RIR 的 RIR,高估了 0RIR 的 RIR。这些结果表明,这 4 个 RIR-速度关系模型在量化史密斯机上俯身卧推运动中的接近力竭方面同样有效。