Suppr超能文献

理性学习者与狭隘规范。

Rational learners and parochial norms.

机构信息

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RH, United Kingdom.

Department of Philosophy, Cornell University, Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America.

出版信息

Cognition. 2023 Apr;233:105366. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105366. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

Parochial norms are narrow in social scope, meaning they apply to certain groups but not to others. Accounts of norm acquisition typically invoke tribal biases: from an early age, people assume a group's behavioral regularities are prescribed and bounded by mere group membership. However, another possibility is rational learning: given the available evidence, people infer the social scope of norms in statistically appropriate ways. With this paper, we introduce a rational learning account of parochial norm acquisition and test a unique prediction that it makes. In one study with adults (N = 480) and one study with children ages 5- to 8-years-old (N = 120), participants viewed violations of a novel rule sampled from one of two unfamiliar social groups. We found that adults judgments of social scope - whether the rule applied only to the sampled group (parochial scope), or other groups (inclusive scope) - were appropriately sensitive to the relevant features of their statistical evidence (Study 1). In children (Study 2) we found an age difference: 7- to 8-year-olds used statistical evidence to infer that norms were parochial or inclusive, whereas 5- to 6-year olds were overall inclusive regardless of statistical evidence. A Bayesian analysis shows a possible inclusivity bias: adults and children inferred inclusive rules more frequently than predicted by a naïve Bayesian model with unbiased priors. This work highlights that tribalist biases in social cognition are not necessary to explain the acquisition of parochial norms.

摘要

特殊主义规范的社会范围很狭窄,这意味着它们仅适用于某些群体,而不适用于其他群体。规范习得的解释通常援引部落偏见:从很小的时候起,人们就认为一个群体的行为规律是由单纯的群体成员身份决定和限制的。然而,另一种可能性是理性学习:根据现有证据,人们会以统计上适当的方式推断规范的社会范围。本文提出了一种特殊主义规范习得的理性学习解释,并对其做出了一个独特的预测。在一项针对成年人(N=480)和一项针对 5 至 8 岁儿童(N=120)的研究中,参与者观看了从两个不熟悉的社会群体中抽取的一个新规则的违反情况。我们发现,成年人对社会范围的判断——即该规则仅适用于抽样群体(特殊主义范围)还是其他群体(包容范围)——与他们的统计证据的相关特征相适应(研究 1)。在儿童(研究 2)中,我们发现了年龄差异:7 至 8 岁的儿童使用统计证据推断规范是特殊主义的还是包容主义的,而 5 至 6 岁的儿童则总体上是包容的,而不管统计证据如何。贝叶斯分析表明存在一种包容性偏见:成年人和儿童推断包容性规则的频率高于具有无偏先验的朴素贝叶斯模型所预测的频率。这项工作强调,社会认知中的部落偏见并不是解释特殊主义规范习得的必要条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验