• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿在道德和社会习俗群体规范背景下的包容决策。

Young children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.

作者信息

Rizzo Michael T, Cooley Shelby, Elenbaas Laura, Killen Melanie

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

Community Center for Education Results, Seattle, WA 98144, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006
PMID:28645542
Abstract

Being a member of a peer group involves making decisions about whom to include in or exclude from the group. Sometimes these decisions are related to whether members of the group support or challenge the norms of the group. To examine how young children weigh concerns for group norms and group membership in both moral and social-conventional norm contexts, children (3- to 6-year-olds; N=73) were asked to decide between including an ingroup member who challenged the group's norm or an outgroup member who supported the norm. Groups held either moral (equal or unequal resource allocation) or social-conventional (traditional or nontraditional) norms. In the moral contexts, children were more likely to include the peer who advocated for the moral concern for equality regardless of the peer's group membership or their group's specific norm. In the social-conventional contexts, however, children were more likely to include the peer who advocated for the conventional concern for maintaining traditions but only at the group-specific level. Furthermore, with age children increasingly based their inclusion decisions on normative concerns, rather than on group membership concerns, and differed in their inclusion decisions for ingroups and outgroups. Finally, children reasoned about their decisions by referencing concerns for fairness, group norms, and group membership, suggesting that preschool children weigh multiple concerns when deciding whom to include in their groups. Overall, the current study revealed differences in how preschool children weigh moral and social-conventional concerns in intergroup contexts.

摘要

成为同龄人群体的一员涉及到决定群体中接纳谁或排斥谁。有时这些决定与群体成员是否支持或挑战群体规范有关。为了研究幼儿在道德和社会习俗规范背景下如何权衡对群体规范和群体成员身份的关注,研究人员询问了儿童(3至6岁;N = 73),让他们在接纳一个挑战群体规范的内群体成员和一个支持该规范的外群体成员之间做出选择。群体持有道德(资源分配平等或不平等)或社会习俗(传统或非传统)规范。在道德背景下,无论同伴的群体成员身份或其群体的具体规范如何,儿童更有可能接纳倡导平等道德关注的同伴。然而,在社会习俗背景下,儿童更有可能接纳倡导维护传统的习俗关注的同伴,但仅限于特定群体层面。此外,随着年龄的增长,儿童越来越多地将他们的接纳决定基于规范关注,而不是群体成员身份关注,并且在对内群体和外群体的接纳决定上存在差异。最后,儿童通过提及对公平、群体规范和群体成员身份的关注来为自己的决定进行推理,这表明学龄前儿童在决定接纳谁进入他们的群体时会权衡多种关注因素。总体而言,当前的研究揭示了学龄前儿童在群体间背景下权衡道德和社会习俗关注的方式存在差异。

相似文献

1
Young children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.幼儿在道德和社会习俗群体规范背景下的包容决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Social Exclusion Based on Group Membership is a Form of Prejudice.基于群体成员身份的社会排斥是一种偏见形式。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;51:103-29. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
3
Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms.儿童在群体规范背景下对资源分配的评价。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Apr;51(4):554-63. doi: 10.1037/a0038796. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
4
Children's expectations about conventional and moral behaviors of ingroup and outgroup members.儿童对群体内和群体外成员的传统及道德行为的期望。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
5
Context differences in children's ingroup preferences.儿童内群体偏好的情境差异。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0035593. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
6
Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.在道德和社会规范规范背景下的内群体和外群体判断的发展。
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1063-80. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
7
Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的群体规范、群体间资源分配和社会推理。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Dec;53(12):2333-2339. doi: 10.1037/dev0000392. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Children's and Adolescents' Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms.儿童和青少年对挑战不公平群体规范的期望。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Oct;46(10):2241-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
9
Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation.年幼的儿童会根据违规者的群体归属有选择性地执行社会规范。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Moral judgments and emotions: adolescents' evaluations in intergroup social exclusion contexts.道德判断与情感:青少年在群体间社会排斥情境中的评价
New Dir Youth Dev. 2012 Winter;2012(136):41-57, 8-9. doi: 10.1002/yd.20037.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors of children's allocation behavior: peer relationship and resource quantity as the main determinants.儿童分配行为的因素:同伴关系和资源数量作为主要决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1368224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368224. eCollection 2024.
2
"A 'Cool' Kid Wears a Brand, and Everyone's following Him" Hierarchal Social Status in Preadolescence: A New Developmental Perspective.“酷小孩”身着品牌服饰,众人纷纷效仿:青春期前的等级社会地位——一种新的发展视角
Children (Basel). 2024 May 3;11(5):547. doi: 10.3390/children11050547.
3
Does Distance Matter? How Physical and Social Distance Shape Our Perceived Obligations to Others.
距离重要吗?身体距离和社交距离如何塑造我们对他人的感知义务。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 May 5;8:511-534. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00138. eCollection 2024.
4
Children's and adolescents' evaluations of wealth-related STEM inequality.儿童和青少年对与财富相关的STEM不平等的评估。
Soc Dev. 2024 Feb;33(1):e12710. doi: 10.1111/sode.12710. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Cooperation and group similarity in children and young adults in the UK.英国儿童和年轻人中的合作与群体相似性。
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 Sep 29;5:e29. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.25. eCollection 2023.
6
Developmental Perspectives on Social Inequalities and Human Rights.社会不平等与人权的发展视角
Hum Dev. 2022 Dec;66(4-5):329-342. doi: 10.1159/000526276. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
To Punish or Exclude? Children's Responses to Unfair and Fair Advantages Created in Competitive Contexts.惩罚还是排斥?儿童对竞争情境中产生的不公平和公平优势的反应。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Apr-Jun;62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101168. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
8
Testing the effectiveness of the Developing Inclusive Youth program: A multisite randomized control trial.测试发展包容青年计划的效果:一项多地点随机对照试验。
Child Dev. 2022 May;93(3):732-750. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13785. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.道德推理促进发展和社会变革。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1209-1225. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964076. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
10
The moral obligations of conflict and resistance.冲突与反抗的道德义务。
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Apr 30;43:e75. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19002401.