• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险选择背后的确定性和概率性规律是在不断变化的决策环境中获得的。

Deterministic and probabilistic regularities underlying risky choices are acquired in a changing decision context.

机构信息

Brain Imaging Centre, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.

Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Izabella utca 46, 1064, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 20;13(1):1127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27642-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-27642-z
PMID:36670165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9859780/
Abstract

Predictions supporting risky decisions could become unreliable when outcome probabilities temporarily change, making adaptation more challenging. Therefore, this study investigated whether sensitivity to the temporal structure in outcome probabilities can develop and remain persistent in a changing decision environment. In a variant of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task with 90 balloons, outcomes (rewards or balloon bursts) were predictable in the task's first and final 30 balloons and unpredictable in the middle 30 balloons. The temporal regularity underlying the predictable outcomes differed across three experimental conditions. In the deterministic condition, a repeating three-element sequence dictated the maximum number of pumps before a balloon burst. In the probabilistic condition, a single probabilistic regularity ensured that burst probability increased as a function of pumps. In the hybrid condition, a repeating sequence of three different probabilistic regularities increased burst probabilities. In every condition, the regularity was absent in the middle 30 balloons. Participants were not informed about the presence or absence of the regularity. Sensitivity to both the deterministic and hybrid regularities emerged and influenced risk taking. Unpredictable outcomes of the middle phase did not deteriorate this sensitivity. In conclusion, humans can adapt their risky choices in a changing decision environment by exploiting the statistical structure that controls how the environment changes.

摘要

当结果概率临时发生变化时,支持风险决策的预测可能变得不可靠,从而使适应更加具有挑战性。因此,本研究探讨了在变化的决策环境中,对结果概率的时间结构的敏感性是否能够发展并保持持久。在一个有 90 个气球的气球模拟风险任务的变体中,在任务的前 30 个和最后 30 个气球中,结果(奖励或气球爆裂)是可预测的,而在中间的 30 个气球中是不可预测的。可预测结果的时间规律在三种实验条件下有所不同。在确定性条件下,一个重复的三元素序列决定了在气球爆裂之前最多可以进行多少次泵压。在概率条件下,单一的概率规律确保爆裂概率随着泵压的增加而增加。在混合条件下,三个不同的概率规律的重复序列增加了爆裂概率。在每种情况下,中间的 30 个气球中都不存在这种规律。参与者没有被告知规律的存在或不存在。对确定性和混合规律的敏感性都出现了,并影响了风险承担。中间阶段不可预测的结果并没有降低这种敏感性。总之,人类可以通过利用控制环境变化方式的统计结构,在变化的决策环境中调整自己的风险选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/f97bbf64d759/41598_2023_27642_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/efce69c6292d/41598_2023_27642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/9a77b4d733fe/41598_2023_27642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/f97bbf64d759/41598_2023_27642_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/efce69c6292d/41598_2023_27642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/9a77b4d733fe/41598_2023_27642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8045/9859780/f97bbf64d759/41598_2023_27642_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deterministic and probabilistic regularities underlying risky choices are acquired in a changing decision context.风险选择背后的确定性和概率性规律是在不断变化的决策环境中获得的。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 20;13(1):1127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27642-z.
2
How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.环境规律如何影响人们在基于经验的概率判断中的信息搜索。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Feb;45(2):219-231. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000572. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Representation of probabilistic outcomes during risky decision-making.风险决策过程中概率结果的表示。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 15;11(1):2419. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16202-y.
4
The Abused Inhalant Toluene Impairs Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity and Risk/Reward Decision-Making during a Probabilistic Discounting Task.滥用吸入剂甲苯会损害内侧前额叶皮层在概率折扣任务中的活动和风险/回报决策能力。
J Neurosci. 2019 Nov 13;39(46):9207-9220. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1674-19.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Decision making in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART): anterior cingulate cortex signals loss aversion but not the infrequency of risky choices.在气球模拟风险任务(BART)中的决策:前扣带皮层信号提示损失厌恶,但不提示风险选择的低频率。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Sep;12(3):479-90. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0102-1.
6
Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.恒河猴的选择序列影响概率失真。
J Neurosci. 2019 Apr 10;39(15):2915-2929. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1454-18.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making.概率性和跨期决策的神经基础。
Brain Res. 2008 Oct 9;1234:104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.105. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
8
Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.非人类灵长类动物在面临模糊情景时会使用综合规则进行决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190672. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Dorsomedial striatal contributions to different forms of risk/reward decision making.背侧纹状体对不同形式的风险/回报决策的贡献。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Feb;178:107369. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107369. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Balancing risk and reward: a rat model of risky decision making.平衡风险与回报:风险决策的大鼠模型
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Sep;34(10):2208-17. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.48. Epub 2009 May 13.