Suppr超能文献

非人类灵长类动物在面临模糊情景时会使用综合规则进行决策。

Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.

机构信息

Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie, EM Strasbourg Business School, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190672. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

Decision outcomes in unpredictable environments may not have exact known probabilities. Yet the predictability level of outcomes matters in decisions, and animals, including humans, generally avoid ambiguous options. Managing ambiguity may be more challenging and requires stronger cognitive skills than decision-making under risk, where decisions involve known probabilities. Here we compare decision-making in capuchins, macaques, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos in risky and ambiguous contexts. Subjects were shown lotteries (a tray of potential rewards, some large, some small) and could gamble a medium-sized food item to obtain one of the displayed rewards. The odds of winning and losing varied and were accessible in the risky context (all rewards were visible) or partially available in the ambiguous context (some rewards were covered). In the latter case, the level of information varied from fully ambiguous (individuals could not guess what was under the covers) to predictable (individuals could guess). None of the species avoided gambling in ambiguous lotteries and gambling rates were high if at least two large rewards were visible. Capuchins and bonobos ignored the covered items and gorillas and macaques took the presence of potential rewards into account, but only chimpanzees and orangutans could consistently build correct expectations about the size of the covered rewards. Chimpanzees and orangutans combined decision rules according to the number of large visible rewards and the level of predictability, a process resembling conditional probabilities assessment in humans. Despite a low sample size, this is the first evidence in non-human primates that a combination of several rules can underlie choices made in an unpredictable environment. Our finding that non-human primates can deal with the uncertainty of an outcome when exchanging one food item for another is a key element to the understanding of the evolutionary origins of economic behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.

摘要

在不可预测的环境下,决策结果可能没有确切的已知概率。然而,结果的可预测性水平在决策中很重要,动物,包括人类,通常会避免模棱两可的选择。与风险决策相比,管理模糊性可能更具挑战性,需要更强的认知技能,因为风险决策涉及已知的概率。在这里,我们比较了卷尾猴、猕猴、猩猩、大猩猩、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在风险和模糊情境下的决策行为。实验对象会看到彩票(一托盘潜在的奖励,有些大,有些小),可以用一个中等大小的食物来赌一个显示的奖励。赢和输的概率在风险情境下是变化的并且是可获得的(所有的奖励都是可见的),或者在模糊情境下是部分可获得的(一些奖励是被覆盖的)。在后一种情况下,信息的水平从完全模糊(个体无法猜测覆盖物下是什么)到可预测(个体可以猜测)不等。没有一种物种会避免在模糊彩票上下注,如果至少有两个大的奖励是可见的,那么下注的比例就很高。卷尾猴和倭黑猩猩忽略了被覆盖的物品,大猩猩和猕猴考虑了潜在奖励的存在,但只有黑猩猩和猩猩能够始终如一地对覆盖奖励的大小做出正确的期望。黑猩猩和猩猩根据可见的大奖励数量和可预测性水平来组合决策规则,这一过程类似于人类对条件概率的评估。尽管样本量较小,但这是首次在非人类灵长类动物中证明,在不可预测的环境下,几种规则的组合可以作为选择的基础。我们的发现表明,非人类灵长类动物可以在用一种食物换取另一种食物时应对结果的不确定性,这是理解经济行为进化起源的关键因素。本文是主题为“非人类灵长类动物的经济行为的存在和普遍性”的一部分。

相似文献

1
Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.非人类灵长类动物在面临模糊情景时会使用综合规则进行决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190672. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
Chimpanzees and bonobos distinguish between risk and ambiguity.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩能区分风险和模糊性。
Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):15-8. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0927. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
5
Ecological rationality: Convergent decision-making in apes and capuchins.生态理性:猿类和卷尾猴的趋同决策
Behav Processes. 2019 Jul;164:201-213. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
10
The adaptive value of probability distortion and risk-seeking in macaques' decision-making.概率扭曲和冒险寻求在猕猴决策中的适应价值。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190668. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0668. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The parietal cortex has a causal role in ambiguity computations in humans.顶叶皮层在人类的歧义计算中具有因果作用。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 10;22(1):e3002452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002452. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Wild skuas can use acoustic cues to locate hidden food.野生贼鸥可以利用声音线索来定位隐藏的食物。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Oct;25(5):1357-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01611-x. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Economic behaviours among non-human primates.非人类灵长类动物的经济行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190676. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0676. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Are the roots of human economic systems shared with non-human primates?人类经济体系的根源与非人类灵长类动物相同吗?
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Feb;109:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.026. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Rhesus macaques use probabilities to predict future events.恒河猴利用概率来预测未来事件。
Evol Hum Behav. 2019 Sep;40(5):436-446. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Flexible combination of reward information across primates.灵长类动物的奖励信息的灵活组合。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Nov;3(11):1215-1224. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0714-3. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴的直观概率推理
Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
The evolutionary roots of human decision making.人类决策的进化根源。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:321-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015310.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验