• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

XINSORB 生物可吸收支架植入后标准与延长双联抗血小板治疗(SPARTA)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

The standard versus prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after the XINSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation (SPARTA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07028-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-07028-8
PMID:36670441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9854195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care after coronary stenting, including coronary stenting involving bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs). Current clinical guidelines recommend at least 12 months of DAPT after BRS implantation. However, the correlation between prolonged DAPT and net clinical benefits remains unknown.

METHODS

The SPARTA trial is designed to be a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, clinical trial. It aims to compare the benefits and risks of DAPT applied for either 12 or 36 months after XINSORB BRS implantation. The primary endpoints are the incidence of the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI), and all revascularizations, as well as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. The secondary endpoints of the study include the device-oriented composite endpoint of target lesion failure (defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization), target vessel failure (defined as cardiac death, MI, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization), scaffold thrombosis, and minor bleeding events. This trial will enroll 2106 subjects treated with the XINSORB BRS only. All subjects will receive DAPT after the index procedure for 12 (± 1) months. Subjects without MACEs or major bleeding will be randomized to receive either 24 additional months of DAPT or aspirin alone.

DISCUSSION

This trial is designed to investigate the impact of extending the duration of DAPT up to 3 years after XINSORB BRS implantation by investigating the balance of risks and benefits in a broad population of treated patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04501900 . Registered on 6 August 2020.

摘要

背景

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)联合阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂是冠状动脉支架置入术后的标准治疗方法,包括生物可吸收支架(BRS)置入后的治疗。目前的临床指南建议 BRS 置入后至少进行 12 个月的 DAPT。然而,延长 DAPT 与净临床获益之间的相关性仍不清楚。

方法

SPARTA 试验是一项前瞻性、随机、平行组临床试验,旨在比较 XINSORB BRS 置入后 12 个月或 36 个月应用 DAPT 的获益与风险。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)复合终点的发生率,包括全因死亡、任何心肌梗死(MI)和所有血运重建,以及出血学术研究联合会(BARC)定义的 3 型或 5 型出血事件。该研究的次要终点包括以器械为导向的复合终点靶病变失败(定义为心脏死亡、与靶血管相关的 MI 或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建)、靶血管失败(定义为心脏死亡、MI 或缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建)、支架血栓形成和轻微出血事件。该试验将纳入 2106 例仅接受 XINSORB BRS 治疗的患者。所有患者在索引手术后将接受 12(±1)个月的 DAPT。无 MACE 或大出血的患者将被随机分为继续接受 24 个月的 DAPT 或单独服用阿司匹林。

讨论

本试验旨在通过研究广泛的治疗患者群体中风险与获益的平衡,来探讨将 XINSORB BRS 置入后 DAPT 的持续时间延长至 3 年的影响。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04501900,于 2020 年 8 月 6 日注册。

相似文献

1
The standard versus prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after the XINSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation (SPARTA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.XINSORB 生物可吸收支架植入后标准与延长双联抗血小板治疗(SPARTA)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07028-8.
2
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Rationale and design of the comparison between a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing implantation of coronary drug-eluting stents (SMART-CHOICE): A prospective multicenter randomized trial.背景与设计:比较冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者中应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的 SMART-CHOICE 前瞻性多中心随机试验。
Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Comparison of 3- to 6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention Using the Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents With Ultrathin Struts: The HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.使用当代超薄支架药物洗脱支架进行冠状动脉介入治疗后3至6个月与12个月双重抗血小板治疗的比较:HOST-IDEA随机临床试验
Circulation. 2023 May 2;147(18):1358-1368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064264. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
5
Prospective multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial of 3-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of the new generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus TARGET-eluting coronary stent: protocol of the TARGET DAPT trial.新一代生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架植入术后3个月与12个月双重抗血小板治疗的前瞻性多中心开放标签随机对照试验:TARGET DAPT试验方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e033774. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033774.
6
Sex-Based Outcomes of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Three Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗 3 个月后单用 P2Y12 抑制剂的性别结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 20;38(45):e383. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e383.
7
6- Versus 24-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Nonresistant to Aspirin: Final Results of the ITALIC Trial (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel).抗阿司匹林药物洗脱支架植入术后 6 个月与 24 个月双联抗血小板治疗:ITALIC 试验(停用氯吡格雷后 DES 是否仍有生命力)的最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1202-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.049.
8
Impact of design of coronary stents and length of dual antiplatelet therapies on ischaemic and bleeding events: a network meta-analysis of 64 randomized controlled trials and 102 735 patients.冠状动脉支架设计和双联抗血小板治疗时长对缺血和出血事件的影响:64 项随机对照试验和 102735 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3160-3172. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx437.
9
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Efficacy and safety of 12 versus 48 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: the OPTImal DUAL antiplatelet therapy (OPTIDUAL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.药物洗脱支架置入后 12 个月与 48 个月双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:OPTImal DUAL antiplatelet therapy(OPTIDUAL)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Feb 21;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-56.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-year clinical outcomes of a sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (XINSORB) and a metallic stent to treat coronary artery stenosis.西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架(XINSORB)与金属支架治疗冠状动脉狭窄的三年临床结果
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Nov;8(22):1489. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6739.
2
Final report of the 5-year clinical outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in the treatment of single coronary lesions in a first-in-human study.XINSORB生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗单支冠状动脉病变的首次人体研究5年临床结果的最终报告。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Sep;8(18):1162. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5668.
3
Time-Varying Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During 5-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Meta-analysis and Individual Patient Data Pooled Study.
5 年随访期间 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架的时变结果:系统评价和个体患者数据合并研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1261-1269. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4101.
4
Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于 PCI 术后高危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2032-2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Twelve-month angiographic and clinical outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold and a metallic stent in patients with coronary artery disease.XINSORB 生物可吸收西罗莫司洗脱支架与金属支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者 12 个月的血管造影和临床结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;293:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.053. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗对心血管事件的影响:SMART-CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8146.
7
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
8
5 Years of Serial Intravascular Imaging Outcomes of XINSORB Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.XINSORB西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架5年连续血管内成像结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25;12(6):602-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: New dawn or frost on snow?用于治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的生物可吸收血管支架:新曙光还是雪上加霜?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):678-679. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27880.
10
Comparison of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic stents: three-year clinical outcomes from the ABSORB China randomised trial.比较依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与金属支架:ABSORB China 随机试验三年临床结果。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 3;14(5):e554-e561. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00796.