• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对孕妇自主权的新威胁。

A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.

作者信息

Johnsen D

机构信息

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Aug-Sep;17(4):33-40.

PMID:3667248
Abstract

Courts and legislatures are increasingly being called upon to restrict the autonomy of pregnant women by requiring them to behave in ways that others determine are best for the fetuses they carry. The state should not attempt to transform pregnant women into ideal baby-making machines. Pregnant women make decisions about their behavior in the context of the rest of their lives, with all the attendant complexities and pressures. Our interest in helping future children by improving prenatal care would best be furthered by helping pregnant women to make informed, less constrained choices, not by punishing women or depriving them of choices altogether.

摘要

法院和立法机构越来越多地被要求限制孕妇的自主权,要求她们按照他人认为对其腹中胎儿最有利的方式行事。国家不应试图将孕妇变成理想的生育机器。孕妇在她们余生的背景下做出关于自身行为的决定,伴随着所有相关的复杂性和压力。我们通过改善产前护理来帮助未来儿童的兴趣,最好是通过帮助孕妇做出明智的、限制较少的选择来进一步实现,而不是通过惩罚妇女或完全剥夺她们的选择。

相似文献

1
A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.对孕妇自主权的新威胁。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Aug-Sep;17(4):33-40.
2
Pregnant women as fetal containers.孕妇作为胎儿的容器。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Dec;16(6):13-4.
3
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
4
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.将胎儿存活能力作为人格认定的门槛:一项法律分析
J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995.
5
Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient.对未出生者的道德义务:作为患者的胎儿
Clin Perinatol. 1987 Jun;14(2):329-43.
6
The concept of wrongful life in the law.法律中的错误生命概念。
Women Health. 1983 Spring;8(1):81-7. doi: 10.1300/J013v08n01_10.
7
Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries.生殖健康与模糊的职业界限。
Womens Health Issues. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/1049-3867(95)00078-X.
8
How technology is reframing the abortion debate.科技如何重塑堕胎辩论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):33-42.
9
Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.确保死产:晚期堕胎中胎儿致死性注射的伦理问题。
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Fall;6(3):254-63.
10
Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.未来的担忧:私人主体施加的产前义务。
Am J Law Med. 1991;17(4):411-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Marital Status-Specific Associations Between Multidomain Leisure Activities and Cognitive Reserve in Clinically Unimpaired Older Adults: Based on a National Chinese Cohort.基于全国性中国队列研究的未患临床疾病的老年人中多领域休闲活动与认知储备之间的婚姻状况特异性关联
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):371. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040371.
2
Disclosure and consent: ensuring the ethical provision of information regarding childbirth.信息披露与同意:确保提供有关分娩的符合伦理的信息。
J Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 23;51(8):550-557. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108283.