Szemitko Marcin, Golubinska-Szemitko Elzbieta, Sienko Jerzy, Falkowski Aleksander, Wiernicki Ireneusz
Department of Interventional Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Department of General and Dental Diagnostic Imaging, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;15(2):541. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020541.
Purpose: Chemoembolization of liver lesions, metastatic from colorectal cancer (CRC), with irinotecan-loaded microspheres shows less efficacy if applied after previous systemic chemotherapy. This is because cancer cells acquire resistance to previously used chemotherapeutic agents, e.g., irinotecan or perhaps via, e.g., modulations of EGFR receptors after use of anti-EGFR antibodies. Objective: To evaluate the effects of prior treatment with anti-EGFR (cetuximab) antibodies on the efficacy of chemoembolization, with irinotecan-loaded microspheres, of liver lesions metastatic from CRC. Patients and methods: The study included 50 patients (27 female, 23 male) with inoperable liver metastases in the course of CRC who underwent a total of 192 chemoembolization procedures with microspheres loaded with 100 mg of irinotecan. Chemoembolization of the right or left liver lobes was performed alternately at three-week intervals. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 26): patients who had previously received anti-EGFR (cetuximab) antibodies; and group B (n = 24): patients who had never received anti-EGFR antibodies. Response to treatment was assessed according to mRECIST criteria. Overall survival time (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan−Meier method. Evaluation of adverse effects was performed according to the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 5.0). Results: Analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in radiological response between the two groups: partial response: 36.2% in group A and 32.9% in group B (p = 0.139); and stable disease: 19.2% in group A and 21.7% in group B (p = 0.224). Post-treatment progression was comparable at 46.2% in group A and 41.6% in group B (p = 0.343). There was a significant difference in OS (p = 0.043 log-rank test), however, prior treatment with cetuximab showed no significant effect on OS in a Cox proportional hazards regression model HR 1.906 (0.977−3.716), p = 0.058. Mean OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval (Cl): 6 to 23 months) in group A and 13.1 months (95% Cl: 7 to 22 months) in group B. In both groups, there was a negative correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels below 10 mg/mL before surgery and OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83 (0.47−8.43), p = 0.005 in group A and HR 1.02 (0.56−7.39), p = 0.003 in group B). There was no significant difference in the number of prominent complications between group A (7 complications) and group B (6 complications), p = 0.663. Conclusions: Previous therapy with anti-EGFR antibodies before treatment with irinotecan chemoembolization of liver metastatic lesions did not have a significant effect on radiological response to treatment or post-treatment progression. However, higher baseline levels of CEA (>10 ng/mL) were correlated with worse OS (p = 0.039).
对于来自结直肠癌(CRC)的肝转移瘤,使用载有伊立替康的微球进行化疗栓塞,如果在先前的全身化疗后应用,疗效会降低。这是因为癌细胞对先前使用的化疗药物产生耐药性,例如伊立替康,或者可能是通过使用抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抗体后EGFR受体的调节等方式。目的:评估先前使用抗EGFR(西妥昔单抗)抗体治疗对载有伊立替康的微球化疗栓塞CRC肝转移瘤疗效的影响。患者和方法:该研究纳入了50例(27例女性,23例男性)患有不可切除的CRC肝转移的患者,他们总共接受了192次使用载有100mg伊立替康的微球进行的化疗栓塞手术。右肝叶或左肝叶的化疗栓塞每隔三周交替进行。患者分为两组:A组(n = 26):先前接受过抗EGFR(西妥昔单抗)抗体治疗的患者;B组(n = 24):从未接受过抗EGFR抗体治疗的患者。根据改良RECIST标准评估治疗反应。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算总生存时间(OS)。根据癌症治疗评估计划不良事件通用术语标准(第5.0版)进行不良反应评估。结果:分析显示两组之间的放射学反应无统计学显著差异:部分缓解:A组为36.2%,B组为32.9%(p = 0.139);疾病稳定:A组为19.2%,B组为21.7%(p = 0.224)。治疗后进展情况在A组为46.2%,B组为41.6%,具有可比性(p = 0.343)。然而,OS存在显著差异(p = 0.043,对数秩检验),不过在Cox比例风险回归模型中,先前使用西妥昔单抗治疗对OS无显著影响,风险比(HR)为1.906(0.977 - 3.716),p = 0.058。A组的平均OS为15.2个月(95%置信区间(Cl):6至23个月),B组为13.1个月(95% Cl:7至22个月)。在两组中,术前癌胚抗原(CEA)水平低于10mg/mL与OS之间均存在负相关(A组风险比(HR)为0.83(0.47 - 8.43),p = 0.005;B组HR为1.02(0.56 - 7.39),p = 0.003)。A组(7例并发症)和B组(6例并发症)之间显著并发症的数量无显著差异,p = 0.663。结论:在使用载有伊立替康的微球化疗栓塞肝转移瘤之前,先前使用抗EGFR抗体治疗对治疗的放射学反应或治疗后进展没有显著影响。然而,较高的基线CEA水平(>10 ng/mL)与较差的OS相关(p = 0.039)。