Czempik Piotr F, Wiórek Agnieszka
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.
Transfusion Committee, University Clinical Center, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;11(2):227. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020227.
One of the 'organs' that can be affected by sepsis is the coagulation system. Coagulopathy in sepsis may take the form of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) or sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). It is important to identify SIC early, as at this stage of coagulopathy anticoagulants may be of the greatest benefit. The most recent diagnostic scoring systems for septic coagulopathy come from the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. Recommendations regarding the management of septic coagulopathy differ between organizations. Moreover, septic coagulopathy is an area of intense research in recent years. Therefore we searched three databases to review the most recent management strategies in septic coagulopathy. The mainstream management strategies in septic coagulopathy include the causal treatment of sepsis, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, antithrombin, and recombinant human thrombomodulin. The last two have been associated with the highest survival benefit. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate use of these anticoagulants should be avoided due to the lack of mortality benefit and increased risk of bleeding. The early diagnosis of SIC and monitoring of coagulation status during sepsis is crucial for the timely management and selection of the most suitable treatment at a time. New directions in septic coagulopathy include new diagnostic biomarkers, dynamic diagnostic models, genetic markers for SIC management, and new therapeutic agents. These new research avenues may potentially result in timelier SIC diagnosis and improved management of all stages of septic coagulopathy by making it more effective, safe, and personalized.
脓毒症可能影响的“器官”之一是凝血系统。脓毒症中的凝血病可能表现为脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC)或脓毒症相关的弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)。早期识别SIC很重要,因为在凝血病的这个阶段,抗凝剂可能会带来最大益处。最新的脓毒症凝血病诊断评分系统来自国际血栓与止血协会和日本急性医学协会。不同组织对于脓毒症凝血病的管理建议有所不同。此外,脓毒症凝血病是近年来研究的热点领域。因此,我们检索了三个数据库,以回顾脓毒症凝血病的最新管理策略。脓毒症凝血病的主流管理策略包括脓毒症的病因治疗、普通肝素、低分子量肝素、抗凝血酶和重组人血栓调节蛋白。后两者与最高的生存获益相关。然而,由于缺乏死亡率获益且出血风险增加,应避免盲目使用这些抗凝剂。SIC的早期诊断以及脓毒症期间凝血状态的监测对于及时管理和适时选择最合适的治疗至关重要。脓毒症凝血病的新方向包括新的诊断生物标志物、动态诊断模型、用于SIC管理的基因标志物以及新的治疗药物。这些新的研究途径可能会通过使脓毒症凝血病的诊断更及时、各阶段管理更有效、更安全且更具个性化,从而潜在地改善脓毒症凝血病的诊断和管理。