• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FRISK(骨折风险)——一种新的骨折概率预测工具。

The FRISK (Fracture Risk)-A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Campus Virchow, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021265.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021265
PMID:36674018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9859434/
Abstract

Increasing patient inflow into the emergency department makes it necessary to optimize triage management. The scope of this work was to determine simple factors that could detect fractures in patients without the need for specialized personnel. Between 2014 and 2015, 798 patients were admitted to an orthopedic emergency department and prospectively included in the study. The patients received a questionnaire before contacting the doctor. Objective and subjective data were evaluated to determine fracture risk for the upper and lower extremities. The highest risk for fractures in one region was the hip (73.21%; = 56), followed by the wrist (60.32%; = 63) and the femoral shaft (4 of 7, 57.14%; = 7). The regions with the lowest risk were the knee (8.41%; = 107), the ankle (18.29%; = 164), and the forearm shaft (30.00%; = 10). Age was a predictor for fracture: patients older than 59 years had a risk greater than 59.26%, and patients older than 90 years had a risk greater than 83.33%. The functional questions could exclude fractures. Three factors seem to be able to predict fracture risk: the injured region, the patient's age, and a functional question. They can be used for a probatory heuristic that needs to be proven in a prospective way.

摘要

患者不断涌入急诊部,使得分诊管理的优化成为必要。这项工作的范围是确定一些简单的因素,这些因素可以在不需要专业人员的情况下检测出患者的骨折情况。2014 年至 2015 年,798 名患者被收入骨科急诊部,并前瞻性地纳入研究。患者在联系医生之前接受了问卷调查。评估了客观和主观数据,以确定上肢和下肢的骨折风险。一个部位骨折风险最高的是髋部(73.21%; = 56),其次是腕部(60.32%; = 63)和股骨干(7 例中的 4 例,57.14%; = 7)。骨折风险最低的部位是膝关节(8.41%; = 107)、踝关节(18.29%; = 164)和前臂骨干(30.00%; = 10)。年龄是骨折的预测因素:年龄大于 59 岁的患者风险大于 59.26%,年龄大于 90 岁的患者风险大于 83.33%。功能问题可以排除骨折。有三个因素似乎可以预测骨折风险:受伤部位、患者年龄和功能问题。它们可用于试探性启发式方法,需要通过前瞻性方法加以证明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/a8087c14685d/ijerph-20-01265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/6c45b4d877b5/ijerph-20-01265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/91f7096da129/ijerph-20-01265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/a8087c14685d/ijerph-20-01265-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/6c45b4d877b5/ijerph-20-01265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/91f7096da129/ijerph-20-01265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9859434/a8087c14685d/ijerph-20-01265-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The FRISK (Fracture Risk)-A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures.FRISK(骨折风险)——一种新的骨折概率预测工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021265.
2
Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.超声辅助踝关节创伤分诊可以减少影像学检查的需求。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;31(12):1686-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
3
Different effects of age, adiposity and physical activity on the risk of ankle, wrist and hip fractures in postmenopausal women.年龄、肥胖和身体活动对绝经后妇女踝关节、腕关节和髋关节骨折风险的不同影响。
Bone. 2012 Jun;50(6):1394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Improvements in hip fracture incidence counterbalanced by the rise of other fracture types: data from Spain 2000-2010.髋部骨折发病率的改善被其他骨折类型的增加所抵消:来自西班牙2000 - 2010年的数据。
Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2076-83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
5
Pain management of upper limb fractures in pediatric emergency department versus general orthopedics emergency department.儿科急诊科与普通骨科急诊科上肢骨折的疼痛管理
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Apr;181(4):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04310-w. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Antegrade nailing in femoral shaft fracture patients - comparison of outcomes of isolated fractures, multiple fractures and severely injured patients.股骨干骨折患者顺行髓内钉治疗 - 单纯骨折、多发骨折和严重创伤患者的结局比较。
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3068-3074. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.044. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Patients with femoral or distal forearm fracture in Germany: a prospective observational study on health care situation and outcome.德国股骨或前臂远端骨折患者:一项关于医疗状况和结局的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Apr 4;6:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-87.
8
Epidemiology of extremity fractures in the Netherlands.荷兰四肢骨折的流行病学。
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1355-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.安大略省双能X线吸收法骨密度测定的应用:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
10
Fracture risk score and absolute risk of fracture.骨折风险评分与骨折绝对风险。
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):495-501. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101406. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency department crowding: why do patients walk-in?急诊科拥挤:患者为何选择自行前来?
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Jun;76(3):217-223. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1710040. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
Staff strategies for dealing with care situations at an emergency department.应对急诊科护理情况的员工策略。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):1038-1044. doi: 10.1111/scs.12812. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
3
Task shifting and emergency nurse practitioners - are nurses the future of emergency medicine?: the French experience.任务转移与急诊执业护士——护士会成为急诊医学的未来吗?:法国的经验。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;27(1):9-10. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000664.
4
Impact of telemedicine on diagnosis, clinical management and outcomes in rural trauma patients: A rapid review.远程医疗对农村创伤患者诊断、临床管理及预后的影响:一项快速综述。
Can J Rural Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;25(1):31-40. doi: 10.4103/CJRM.CJRM_8_19.
5
Differential effects of experimentally induced anxiety and fear on pain: the role of anxiety sensitivity.实验性诱导的焦虑和恐惧对疼痛的不同影响:焦虑敏感性的作用。
J Pain Res. 2019 Jun 6;12:1791-1801. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S189011. eCollection 2019.
6
Use of Telemedicine to Screen Patients in the Emergency Department: Matched Cohort Study Evaluating Efficiency and Patient Safety of Telemedicine.使用远程医疗对急诊科患者进行筛查:评估远程医疗效率和患者安全性的匹配队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 8;7(2):e11233. doi: 10.2196/11233.
7
Intuitive versus Algorithmic Triage.直观分诊与算法分诊
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Aug;33(4):355-361. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000626.
8
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.护士在初级保健中替代医生的角色。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.
9
Traumatic fractures in adults: missed diagnosis on plain radiographs in the Emergency Department.成人创伤性骨折:急诊科X线平片漏诊情况
Acta Biomed. 2018 Jan 19;89(1-S):111-123. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i1-S.7015.
10
Pain Assessment of Elderly Patients with Cognitive Impairment in the Emergency Department: Implications for Pain Management-A Narrative Review of Current Practices.急诊科认知障碍老年患者的疼痛评估:对疼痛管理的启示——当前实践的叙述性综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Jun 1;5(2):30. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020030.