Suppr超能文献

骨折风险评分与骨折绝对风险。

Fracture risk score and absolute risk of fracture.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences-Barwon Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, University of Melbourne, PO Box 281, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.

出版信息

Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):495-501. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101406. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report the 5- and 10-year absolute risk of fracture associated with the previously reported fracture risk (FRISK) score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All participants gave written, informed consent, and the Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study. An age-stratified population-based sample of women aged 60 years and older (n = 600) was recruited during 1994-1996. FRISK scores of 0-10 incorporating bone mineral density (BMD) at two sites (hip and spine), falls scores in the previous 12 months of 1-4, weight, and number of fractures as an adult were calculated. Fractures of the hip, spine, humerus, and wrist were ascertained during a median follow-up period of 9.6 years (interquartile range, 6.6-10.5). The cumulative probability of fracture at 5 and 10 years after baseline measurements was calculated by using actuarial methods. The utility of this model was compared with other FRISK algorithms, including the World Health Organization FRISK assessment tool FRAX designed for United Kingdom and that designed for the United States and the Garvan nomogram (Australia).

RESULTS

This study supplies the 5- and 10-year absolute risk of fracture associated with all levels of the FRISK score. While there are modest differences in absolute risk of fracture seen for different numbers of prior fractures, the more marked differences occur across the different categories of falls scores and different categories of BMD. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed no significant difference in area under the curve for all four absolute risk of fracture algorithms.

CONCLUSION

Absolute risk of fracture can be determined by using readily obtainable clinical information that may aid treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

报告与先前报告的骨折风险(FRISK)评分相关的 5 年和 10 年绝对骨折风险。

材料和方法

所有参与者均书面同意,并获得了 Barwon 健康人体研究伦理委员会的批准。在 1994 年至 1996 年期间,招募了年龄分层的、基于人群的 60 岁及以上女性样本(n=600)。计算了包含两个部位(髋部和脊柱)骨密度(BMD)、12 个月内跌倒评分(1-4 分)、体重和成人骨折次数的 0-10 分 FRISK 评分。在中位随访期 9.6 年(四分位间距,6.6-10.5)期间,确定了髋部、脊柱、肱骨和腕部骨折。使用 actuarial 方法计算基线测量后 5 年和 10 年的骨折累积概率。将该模型的实用性与其他 FRISK 算法进行了比较,包括为英国设计的世界卫生组织 FRISK 评估工具 FRAX 和为美国和 Garvan 图设计的 FRISK 算法(澳大利亚)。

结果

本研究提供了与 FRISK 评分所有水平相关的 5 年和 10 年绝对骨折风险。虽然不同既往骨折数量的骨折绝对风险存在适度差异,但在不同跌倒评分类别和不同 BMD 类别之间的差异更为明显。接受者操作特征曲线显示,所有四种绝对骨折风险算法的曲线下面积均无显著差异。

结论

可以使用易于获得的临床信息来确定骨折的绝对风险,这可能有助于治疗决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验