Suppr超能文献

在肺动脉高压试验中,六分钟步行试验的回归均值之外没有安慰剂效应。

No Placebo Effect beyond Regression to the Mean on the Six Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Trials.

机构信息

Department for Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, 58458 Witten, Germany.

Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 5;24(2):1069. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021069.

Abstract

In drug studies, patients are often included when the disease activity is high. This will make any treatment appear to lessen disease activity, although the improvement is biased by selection. This effect is known as regression towards the mean (RTM). We aimed at investigating drug trials in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) using the 6-minute walking distance test (6MWD) as a primary outcome for the phenomenon of RTM. An existing registry of 43 open label studies and 23 randomized controlled trials conducted between 1990 and 2009 was used as the data source. Data analysis was carried out for 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 24 open label studies out of this registry. Data were analyzed for verum and placebo arms of the RCTs separately, as well as for the open label arms. In the verum arms, the overall effect given as 33.2 m (95% CI: 25.7; 40.6]); 6MWD was slightly lower than the effect in the observational studies, with 44.6 m (95% CI: [25.4; 63.8]). After studying and interpreting the data, we found that regression towards the mean plays only a minor role in PAH studies. In particular, placebo effects in the RCTs were negligibly small, with a mean 6MWD of -2.5 m (95% CI: [-9.8; 4.7]) in the placebo arm. Therefore, our analysis indicates that results of non-randomized observational studies can be regarded as valid tools for gaining valid clinical effects in patients with PAH.

摘要

在药物研究中,通常会纳入疾病活动度高的患者。这将使任何治疗方法看起来都能减轻疾病活动度,尽管这种改善是由于选择偏倚造成的。这种效应被称为向均数回归(RTM)。我们旨在研究肺动脉高压(PAH)药物试验,将 6 分钟步行距离测试(6MWD)作为 RTM 现象的主要结局。使用一个现有的注册数据库,其中包含 1990 年至 2009 年间进行的 43 项开放标签研究和 23 项随机对照试验,作为数据来源。对该注册数据库中的 18 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 24 项开放标签研究进行了数据分析。对 RCT 的真药和安慰剂组以及开放标签组分别进行了数据分析。在真药组中,总体效果为 33.2m(95%CI:25.7;40.6);6MWD 略低于观察性研究的效果,为 44.6m(95%CI:[25.4;63.8])。在研究和解释数据后,我们发现向均数回归在 PAH 研究中仅起次要作用。特别是,RCT 中的安慰剂效应可以忽略不计,安慰剂组的平均 6MWD 为-2.5m(95%CI:[-9.8;4.7])。因此,我们的分析表明,非随机观察性研究的结果可以被视为评估 PAH 患者临床疗效的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cf/9865257/e889a719f68f/ijms-24-01069-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验