• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国吡氟菌酰胺抗性机制

Mechanism of Pydiflumetofen Resistance in in China.

作者信息

Zhou Feng, Zhou Huan-Huan, Han Ao-Hui, Guo Kou-Yun, Liu Tian-Cheng, Wu Yan-Bing, Hu Hai-Yan, Li Cheng-Wei

机构信息

Henan Engineering Research Center of Crop Genome Editing/Henan International Joint Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Soil Remediation, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.

Postdoctoral Research Base, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.

出版信息

J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;9(1):62. doi: 10.3390/jof9010062.

DOI:10.3390/jof9010062
PMID:36675883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9866472/
Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB), which is primarily caused by Fusarium graminearum, is a widespread and devastating disease of wheat. In the absence of resistant varieties, the control of FHB relies heavily on the application of fungicides, and the new generation SDHI fungicide, pydiflumetofen, has recently been registered in China for the control of FHB in wheat. The current study explored three genetically stable, highly resistant laboratory mutants (S2-4-2R, S27-3R, and S28-2R, with EC50 values of 25.10, 28.57, and 19.22 μg/mL, respectively) to investigate the potential risks associated with pydiflumetofen resistance. Although the mycelial growth of the mutants differed little compared to their parental isolates, the study found that the resistant mutants exhibited significantly reduced (p < 0.05) levels of sporulation and pathogenicity, which suggests a significant fitness cost associated with pydiflumetofen resistance in F. graminearum. Sequence analysis of the Sdh target protein identified numerous amino acid substitutions in the predicted sequences of the four subunits: FgSdhA, FgSdhB, FgSdhC, and FgSdhD. Indeed, the mutants were found to have a series of substitution in multiple subunits such that all three exhibited five identical changes, including Y182F in the FgSdhA subunit; H53Q, C90S, and A94V in FgSdhB; and S31F in FgSdhC. In addition, gene expression analysis revealed that all of the FgSdh genes had significantly altered expression (p < 0.05), particularly FgSdhA and FgdhC, which exhibited remarkably low levels of expression. However, the study found no evidence of cross-resistance between pydiflumetofen and tebuconazole, fludioxonil, prochloraz, fluazinam, carbendazim, pyraclostrobin, or difenoconazole, which indicates that these fungicides, either in rotation or combination with pydiflumetofen, could mitigate the risk of resistance emerging and provide ongoing control of FHB to ensure high and stable wheat yields.

摘要

赤霉病(FHB)主要由禾谷镰刀菌引起,是一种广泛传播且极具破坏性的小麦病害。在缺乏抗性品种的情况下,赤霉病的防治严重依赖杀菌剂的使用,新一代琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂(SDHI)杀菌剂氟吡菌酰胺最近已在中国登记用于防治小麦赤霉病。本研究探究了三个遗传稳定、高抗的实验室突变体(S2-4-2R、S27-3R和S28-2R,其半数有效浓度(EC50)值分别为25.10、28.57和19.22μg/mL),以调查与氟吡菌酰胺抗性相关的潜在风险。尽管与亲本菌株相比,突变体的菌丝生长差异不大,但研究发现抗性突变体的产孢量和致病性显著降低(p<0.05),这表明禾谷镰刀菌对氟吡菌酰胺的抗性存在显著的适合度代价。对琥珀酸脱氢酶(Sdh)靶蛋白的序列分析在四个亚基(FgSdhA、FgSdhB、FgSdhC和FgSdhD)的预测序列中鉴定出许多氨基酸替换。实际上,发现突变体在多个亚基中存在一系列替换,使得所有三个突变体都表现出五个相同的变化,包括FgSdhA亚基中的Y182F;FgSdhB中的H53Q、C90S和A94V;以及FgSdhC中的S31F。此外,基因表达分析表明,所有FgSdh基因的表达均有显著改变(p<0.05),尤其是FgSdhA和FgdhC,其表达水平极低。然而,该研究未发现氟吡菌酰胺与戊唑醇、咯菌腈、咪鲜胺、氟啶胺、多菌灵、吡唑醚菌酯或苯醚甲环唑之间存在交叉抗性的证据,这表明这些杀菌剂无论是轮用还是与氟吡菌酰胺混用,都可以降低抗性出现的风险,并持续防治赤霉病以确保小麦高产稳产。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/cdd59a0cff09/jof-09-00062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/96129efc4768/jof-09-00062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/eed1bb8f6c12/jof-09-00062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/13c3790ad19c/jof-09-00062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/cdd59a0cff09/jof-09-00062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/96129efc4768/jof-09-00062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/eed1bb8f6c12/jof-09-00062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/13c3790ad19c/jof-09-00062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa7/9866472/cdd59a0cff09/jof-09-00062-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanism of Pydiflumetofen Resistance in in China.中国吡氟菌酰胺抗性机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;9(1):62. doi: 10.3390/jof9010062.
2
Baseline Pydiflumetofen Sensitivity of Isolates Collected from Henan, China, and Potential Resistance Mechanisms.中国河南分离株的基础吡氟氯禾灵敏感性及潜在的抗性机制
Plant Dis. 2023 Aug;107(8):2417-2423. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-22-1852-RE. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
Characterization of the fludioxonil and phenamacril dual resistant mutants of Fusarium graminearum.禾谷镰孢菌氟啶酮和苯霜灵双抗突变体的特性。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2024 Mar;200:105815. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.105815. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Resistance risk assessment for Fusarium graminearum to pydiflumetofen, a new succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor.小麦赤霉病菌对琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂吡唑醚菌酯的抗药性风险评估。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Apr;76(4):1549-1559. doi: 10.1002/ps.5675. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Investigating the Potential Mechanism of Pydiflumetofen Resistance in .研究[具体对象]中氟吡菌酰胺抗性的潜在机制
Plant Dis. 2021 Nov;105(11):3580-3585. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0455-RE. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Biological and molecular characterization of pydiflumetofen and phenamacril dual-resistant Fusarium graminearum strains.吡唑萘菌胺和苯并烯氟菌唑双抗禾谷镰刀菌的生物学和分子特征。
Pest Manag Sci. 2024 Oct;80(10):4959-4966. doi: 10.1002/ps.8226. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Exploring the Potential Mechanism of Prothioconazole Resistance in in China.探究中国丙硫菌唑抗性的潜在机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;9(10):1001. doi: 10.3390/jof9101001.
8
Characterization of Fusarium graminearum isolates resistant to both carbendazim and a new fungicide JS399-19.对多菌灵和新型杀菌剂JS399-19均具有抗性的禾谷镰刀菌分离株的特性分析
Phytopathology. 2009 Apr;99(4):441-6. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-4-0441.
9
Sensitivity and Resistance Risk Assessment of from Wheat to Prothioconazole.小麦对丙硫菌唑的敏感性和抗药性风险评估。
Plant Dis. 2022 Aug;106(8):2097-2104. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2684-RE. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
10
Fusarium graminearum FgSdhC1 point mutation A78V confers resistance to the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen.镰刀菌禾谷变种 FgSdhC1 点突变 A78V 赋予对琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂吡氟酰草胺的抗性。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 May;78(5):1780-1788. doi: 10.1002/ps.6795. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten-Year Comparison of Fungicide Sensitivity and Mycotoxin Production of Fusarium Head Blight Isolates from Korea.韩国小麦赤霉病菌株杀菌剂敏感性及霉菌毒素产生的十年比较
Plant Pathol J. 2025 Aug;41(4):518-531. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.05.2025.0068. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
A cationic amphiphilic drug synergizes with strobilurin fungicides to control fungal-borne plant diseases.一种阳离子两亲性药物与甲氧基丙烯酸酯类杀菌剂协同作用,以控制由真菌传播的植物病害。
Cell Chem Biol. 2025 Jun 19;32(6):872-884.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
The impact of spray-induced gene silencing on cereal phyllosphere microbiota.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterization of the Gene Family Reveals Genes for FHB Resistance in Bread Wheat ( L.).基因家族的特征分析揭示了普通小麦中抗赤霉病的基因。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 28;23(13):7157. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137157.
2
Biological and molecular characterizations of field fludioxonil-resistant isolates of Fusarium graminearum.田间氟啶酮抗性禾谷镰刀菌的生物学和分子特征。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2022 Jun;184:105101. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105101. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Baseline Sensitivity and Potential Resistance Mechanisms for to Fludioxonil.
喷雾诱导基因沉默对谷物叶际微生物群的影响。
Environ Microbiome. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40793-024-00660-8.
4
The Mechanisms of Developing Fungicide Resistance in Causing Fusarium Head Blight and Fungicide Resistance Management.镰刀菌穗腐病致病过程中杀菌剂抗性产生的机制及杀菌剂抗性管理
Pathogens. 2024 Nov 18;13(11):1012. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13111012.
5
Siderophore-synthesizing NRPS reprogram lipid metabolic profiles for phenotype and function changes of Arthrobotrys oligospora.铁载体合成 NRPS 重塑了寡枝菌素 Arthrobotrys oligospora 的脂代谢谱,从而改变了其表型和功能。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023 Dec 20;40(2):46. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03840-9.
6
Exploring the Potential Mechanism of Prothioconazole Resistance in in China.探究中国丙硫菌唑抗性的潜在机制
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;9(10):1001. doi: 10.3390/jof9101001.
对氟唑菌酰胺的基础敏感性和潜在抗性机制。
Plant Dis. 2022 Aug;106(8):2138-2144. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-21-2626-RE. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
4
Resistance risk assessment for a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen in Fusarium asiaticum.新型琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂吡氟酰草胺对亚洲镰刀菌的抗药性风险评估。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jan;77(1):538-547. doi: 10.1002/ps.6053. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
A Rapid Molecular Detection System for SdhB and SdhC Point Mutations Conferring Differential Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor Resistance in Populations.一种快速分子检测系统,用于检测 SdhB 和 SdhC 点突变,这些突变赋予了人群中对琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂的不同抗性。
Plant Dis. 2021 Mar;105(3):660-666. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0724-RE. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
The relationship between features enabling SDHI fungicide binding to the Sc-Sdh complex and its inhibitory activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.SDHI 型杀菌剂与 Sc-Sdh 复合物结合的特征与其对核盘菌抑制活性之间的关系。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Aug;76(8):2799-2808. doi: 10.1002/ps.5827. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
A dispensable paralog of succinate dehydrogenase subunit C mediates standing resistance towards a subclass of SDHI fungicides in Zymoseptoria tritici.琥珀酸脱氢酶亚基 C 的一个可有可无的旁系同源物介导了玉蜀黍平脐蠕孢对一类 SDHI 杀菌剂的耐立性。
PLoS Pathog. 2019 Dec 20;15(12):e1007780. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007780. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Resistance risk assessment for Fusarium graminearum to pydiflumetofen, a new succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor.小麦赤霉病菌对琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂吡唑醚菌酯的抗药性风险评估。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Apr;76(4):1549-1559. doi: 10.1002/ps.5675. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Boscalid Resistance in : Distribution, Effect on Field Efficacy, and Molecular Characterization.多杀菌素抗性在 :分布、对田间药效的影响和分子特征。
Plant Dis. 2019 Jun;103(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1555-RE. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Resistance to Pyraclostrobin and Boscalid in Botrytis cinerea Isolates from Strawberry Fields in the Carolinas.来自卡罗来纳州草莓田的灰葡萄孢菌分离株对吡唑醚菌酯和啶酰菌胺的抗性
Plant Dis. 2012 Aug;96(8):1198-1203. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1049-RE.