Pavlů Tereza, Pešta Jan, Vlach Tomáš, Fořtová Kristina
University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Technical University in Prague, Třinecká 1024, 27343 Bustehrad, Czech Republic.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;16(2):616. doi: 10.3390/ma16020616.
In the case of concrete sustainability, two main ways are generally discussed: (1) the reduction of natural raw materials and (2) the reduction of emissions related to concrete production. Following the second point, there have not yet been reported clear results. This problem is not given enough attention in present publications. This study brings a general view of this issue and a basic comparison with common concrete and traditional reinforcement. This case study deals with the life cycle analysis of a concrete slab made of recycled aggregate concrete with a fine recycled aggregate. The concrete slab was designed according to the limit states of load-bearing capacity and serviceability, which is based on the experimental verification of recycled aggregate concrete properties. Two different reinforcements are compared: (1) ordinary reinforcement by steel bars and (2) glass fibers. Furthermore, scenarios vary due to the slab thickness and reinforcement percentage. The results show the positive environmental impact of replacing natural sand with a fine recycled aggregate. The reduction of climate change potential can be almost 40% in some cases.
在混凝土可持续性方面,通常讨论两种主要方式:(1)减少天然原材料的使用;(2)减少与混凝土生产相关的排放。就第二点而言,目前尚未有明确的研究结果报道。这个问题在当前的出版物中没有得到足够的关注。本研究给出了该问题的总体观点,并与普通混凝土和传统钢筋进行了基本比较。本案例研究对一块由细再生骨料混凝土制成的混凝土板进行了生命周期分析。该混凝土板是根据承载能力和适用性的极限状态设计的,这基于对再生骨料混凝土性能的实验验证。比较了两种不同的配筋方式:(1)普通钢筋配筋;(2)玻璃纤维配筋。此外,由于板厚和配筋率的不同,出现了不同的情况。结果表明,用细再生骨料替代天然砂对环境有积极影响。在某些情况下,气候变化潜力的降低幅度可达近40%。