Gomes Catarina, Martins Francisco, Reis José Alexandre, Maurício Paulo Durão, Ramírez-Fernández María Piedad
Health Sciences PhD Program, Universidad Católica de Murcia UCAM, Campus de los Jerónimos nº135, 30107 Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain.
Oral Rehabilitation Department, Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Quinta da Granja-Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):397. doi: 10.3390/polym15020397.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the color changes of feldspathic ceramics CEREC Blocs (Dentsply Sirona, Milford, DE, USA) when cemented with different luting agents, while varying the ceramic thickness. Seventy ceramic discs of feldspathic ceramic (A2 shade) were obtained with 0.5 and 0.8 mm thicknesses. Seventy composite discs (A3 shade) 1 mm in thickness were used as substrates. After being polished and conditioned, the ceramic and composite discs were cemented with different resin cements and a flowable composite: Variolink Esthetic Light, Neutral and Warm (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein); RelyX Veneer B0.5, Translucent and A3 Opaque/yellow shades (3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA); G-aenial Universal Flow A2 (GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium). Color difference (ΔE) was determined using a spectrophotometer. A two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni method with a 95% confidence interval. Variolink Neutral showed the highest ΔE (15.12 ± 0.71) and RelyX Veneer A3 the lowest value (1.59 ± 0.33). There are no statistically significant differences between the two ceramic thicknesses for Variolink Light ( = 0.230) and RelyX Veneer B0.5 ( = 0.318) cements. The feldspathic ceramic final color is influenced by the cement used and the ceramic thickness. The use of different cements in a thin ceramic has a clinically significant impact on the final esthetic result.
本研究的目的是评估当使用不同的粘接剂粘接时,不同陶瓷厚度的长石质陶瓷CEREC Blocs(美国特拉华州米尔福德登士柏西诺德公司)的颜色变化。制备了70个厚度为0.5毫米和0.8毫米的长石质陶瓷(A2色)圆盘。使用70个厚度为1毫米的复合树脂圆盘(A3色)作为基底。在进行抛光和预处理后,将陶瓷圆盘和复合树脂圆盘用不同的树脂水门汀和一种流动复合树脂进行粘接:Variolink Esthetic Light、Neutral和Warm(列支敦士登公国沙恩义获嘉伟瓦登特公司);RelyX Veneer B0.5、Translucent和A3 Opaque/yellow色(美国明尼苏达州圣保罗3M口腔护理公司);G-aenial Universal Flow A2(比利时鲁汶GC欧洲公司)。使用分光光度计测定颜色差异(ΔE)。采用双向方差分析,并使用Bonferroni方法进行多重比较,置信区间为95%。Variolink Neutral显示出最高的ΔE(15.12±0.71),而RelyX Veneer A3显示出最低的值(1.59±0.33)。对于Variolink Light(P = 0.230)和RelyX Veneer B0.5(P = 0.318)水门汀,两种陶瓷厚度之间没有统计学上的显著差异。长石质陶瓷的最终颜色受所用粘接剂和陶瓷厚度的影响。在薄陶瓷中使用不同的粘接剂对最终的美学效果有临床显著影响。