Hernandes Daiana Kelly Lopes, Arrais Cesar Augusto Galvão, Lima Erick de, Cesar Paulo Francisco, Rodrigues José Augusto
- Universidade de Guarulhos, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Guarulhos, SP, Brasil.
- Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Departamento de Dentística, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;24(4):391-6. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150550.
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of two different shades of resin cement (RC- A1 and A3) layer on color change, translucency parameter (TP), and chroma of low (LT) and high (HT) translucent reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic laminates.
One dual-cured RC (Variolink II, A1- and A3-shade, Ivoclar Vivadent) was applied to 1-mm thick ceramic discs to create thin RC films (100 µm thick) under the ceramics. The RC was exposed to light from a LED curing unit. Color change (ΔE) of ceramic discs was measured according to CIELab* system with a standard illuminant D65 in reflectance mode in a spectrophotometer, operating in the light range of 360-740 nm, equipped with an integrating sphere. The color difference between black (B) and white (W) background readings was used for TP analysis, while chroma was calculated by the formula Cab=(a2+b*2)½. ΔE of 3.3 was set as the threshold of clinically unacceptable. The results were evaluated by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.
HT ceramics showed higher ΔE and higher TP than LT ceramics. A3-shade RC promoted higher ΔE than A1-shade cement, regardless of the ceramic translucency. No significant difference in TP was noted between ceramic discs with A1- and those with A3-shade cement. Ceramic with underlying RC showed lower TP than discs without RC. HT ceramics showed lower chroma than LT ceramics, regardless of the resin cement shade. The presence of A3-shade RC resulted in higher chroma than the presence of A1-shade RC.
Darker underlying RC layer promoted more pronounced changes in ceramic translucency, chroma, and shade of high translucent ceramic veneers. These differences may not be clinically differentiable.
本体外研究评估了两种不同色度的树脂水门汀(RC - A1和A3)层对低透明度(LT)和高透明度(HT)增强型二硅酸锂陶瓷贴面的颜色变化、透明度参数(TP)和色度的影响。
将一种双固化树脂水门汀(Variolink II,A1和A3色度,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)应用于1毫米厚的陶瓷圆盘,以在陶瓷下方形成薄的树脂水门汀膜(100微米厚)。树脂水门汀经发光二极管固化装置照射。使用配备积分球的分光光度计,在360 - 740纳米的光范围内,以标准照明体D65在反射模式下根据CIELab系统测量陶瓷圆盘的颜色变化(ΔE)。黑色(B)和白色(W)背景读数之间的色差用于TP分析,而色度通过公式Cab = (a2 + b2)½计算。将3.3的ΔE设定为临床不可接受的阈值。结果通过双向方差分析,随后进行Tukey事后检验进行评估。
HT陶瓷比LT陶瓷表现出更高的ΔE和更高的TP。无论陶瓷的透明度如何,A3色度的树脂水门汀比A1色度的水门汀促进更高的ΔE。A1色度和A3色度树脂水门汀的陶瓷圆盘之间在TP上未观察到显著差异。有树脂水门汀底层的陶瓷比没有树脂水门汀的圆盘显示出更低的TP。HT陶瓷比LT陶瓷表现出更低的色度,无论树脂水门汀的色度如何。A3色度树脂水门汀的存在比A1色度树脂水门汀的存在导致更高的色度。
较深的树脂水门汀底层会促进高透明度陶瓷贴面的陶瓷透明度、色度和色调发生更明显的变化。这些差异在临床上可能无法区分。