• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字媒体对新冠疫情的搜索如何影响疫苗犹豫?探索谷歌趋势、信息疫情、阴谋论信仰和宗教宿命论之间的权衡

How Does Digital Media Search for COVID-19 Influence Vaccine Hesitancy? Exploring the Trade-off between Google Trends, Infodemics, Conspiracy Beliefs and Religious Fatalism.

作者信息

Gao Jiayue, Raza Syed Hassan, Yousaf Muhammad, Shah Amjad Ali, Hussain Iltaf, Malik Aqdas

机构信息

The Bartlett, UCL Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Institute of Media and Communication Studies, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 66000, Pakistan.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 3;11(1):114. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010114.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines11010114
PMID:36679959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9860569/
Abstract

Digital media has remained problematic during COVID-19 because it has been the source of false and unverified facts. This was particularly evident in the widespread misinformation and confusion regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Past research suggested infodemics, conspiracy beliefs, and religious fatalism as potential threats to public COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. However, the literature is primarily void of empirical evidence associating demographic attributes with efforts to build vaccine hesitancy. Therefore, this research uses two studies: (Study 1) Google Trends and (Study 2) survey method to provide inclusive empirical insight into public use of digital media during COVID-19 and the detrimental effects of infodemics, conspiracy beliefs, and religious fatalism as they were related to building COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using Google Trends based on popular keywords the public searched over one year, Study 1 explores public digital media use during COVID-19. Drawing on this exploration, Study 2 used a cross-sectional national representative survey of 2120 adult Pakistanis to describe the influence of potential hazards such as infodemics on public vaccine hesitancy. Study 2 revealed that infodemics, conspiracy beliefs, and religious fatalism predict vaccine hesitancy. In addition, gender moderates the relationship between infodemics and conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy. This implies that there is a dispositional effect of the infodemics and conspiracy beliefs spread digitally. This study's findings benefit health and other concerned authorities to help them reduce religious fatalism, vaccine hesitancy, and conspiracy theories with targeted communication campaigns on digital media.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,数字媒体一直存在问题,因为它一直是虚假和未经证实信息的来源。这在关于新冠疫苗的广泛错误信息和混乱中尤为明显。过去的研究表明,信息疫情、阴谋论信仰和宗教宿命论是公众对新冠疫苗犹豫不决的潜在威胁。然而,文献中主要缺乏将人口统计学属性与制造疫苗犹豫情绪的努力相关联的实证证据。因此,本研究采用两项研究:(研究1)谷歌趋势和(研究2)调查方法,以全面深入地了解新冠疫情期间公众对数字媒体的使用情况,以及信息疫情、阴谋论信仰和宗教宿命论与制造新冠疫苗犹豫情绪相关的有害影响。研究1基于公众在一年中搜索的热门关键词使用谷歌趋势,探索新冠疫情期间公众对数字媒体的使用情况。基于这一探索,研究2对2120名成年巴基斯坦人进行了全国代表性横断面调查,以描述信息疫情等潜在危害对公众疫苗犹豫情绪的影响。研究2表明,信息疫情、阴谋论信仰和宗教宿命论预示着疫苗犹豫情绪。此外,性别调节了信息疫情与阴谋论信仰和疫苗犹豫情绪之间的关系。这意味着信息疫情和阴谋论信仰通过数字方式传播具有倾向性影响。本研究的结果有助于卫生和其他相关当局通过在数字媒体上开展有针对性的宣传活动,帮助他们减少宗教宿命论、疫苗犹豫情绪和阴谋论。

相似文献

1
How Does Digital Media Search for COVID-19 Influence Vaccine Hesitancy? Exploring the Trade-off between Google Trends, Infodemics, Conspiracy Beliefs and Religious Fatalism.数字媒体对新冠疫情的搜索如何影响疫苗犹豫?探索谷歌趋势、信息疫情、阴谋论信仰和宗教宿命论之间的权衡
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 3;11(1):114. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010114.
2
Unlocking infodemics and mysteries in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Nexus of conspiracy beliefs, digital informational support, psychological Well-being, and religious fatalism.解锁 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫中的信息疫情和谜团:阴谋信仰、数字信息支持、心理健康和宗教宿命论的关系。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 3;41(10):1703-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
3
On the relationship between conspiracy theory beliefs, misinformation, and vaccine hesitancy.论阴谋论信仰、错误信息与疫苗犹豫之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276082. eCollection 2022.
4
Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.通过数字时代的公益广告培养脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种意愿:错误信息、虚假信息、假新闻和宗教宿命论的调节作用
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;10(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101733.
5
Evaluation of Conspiracy Beliefs, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Willingness to Pay towards COVID-19 Vaccines in Six Countries from Asian and African Regions: A Large Multinational Analysis.亚非地区六个国家对新冠疫苗的阴谋论信念、疫苗犹豫态度及支付意愿评估:一项大型跨国分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 4;10(11):1866. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111866.
6
Novel Psychosocial Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫苗犹豫的新型社会心理关联因素:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 27;7:e45980. doi: 10.2196/45980.
7
Mistrust and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Differently Mediate the Effects of Psychological Factors on Propensity for COVID-19 Vaccine.对阴谋论的不信任和信念对心理因素影响新冠疫苗接种倾向的作用存在不同的中介效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 7;12:683684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683684. eCollection 2021.
8
Demographic Factors, Conspiracy Theories, and Beliefs Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pakistani Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.人口统计学因素、阴谋论以及与巴基斯坦民众对新冠疫苗犹豫态度相关的信念:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 17;14(12):e32629. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32629. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Vax attacks: How conspiracy theory belief undermines vaccine support.疫苗攻击:阴谋论信仰如何削弱疫苗支持。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):135-169. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
10
Vaccine Hesitancy in India: Facilitators and Inhibitors.印度的疫苗犹豫:促进因素和阻碍因素。
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Dec;50(6):822-834. doi: 10.1177/10901981231179503. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Implications of Risk Communication Strategies in Diminishing Adversities of Misinformation and Disinformation Against Hepatitis Vaccination in Global South.探索风险沟通策略在减轻全球南方地区有关肝炎疫苗的错误信息和虚假信息所带来的不利影响方面的意义。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Apr 1;18:1133-1145. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S501423. eCollection 2025.
2
Pandemic or "Plandemic"?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs.大流行还是“假大流行”?:认知辩护策略在新冠病毒阴谋论信念与新冠疫苗阴谋论信念之间关系中的中介作用
Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70275. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70275.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.生物武器还是骗局?关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发和大流行行为的不同阴谋论之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
2
Climate Changes, Natural Resources Depletion, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Russian-Ukrainian War: What Is the Impact on Habits Change and Mental Health?气候变化、自然资源枯竭、COVID-19 大流行和俄乌战争:对习惯改变和心理健康有何影响?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911929.
3
Google Trends applications for COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis.
谷歌趋势在新冠疫情中的应用:一项文献计量分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 2;11:20552076241310055. doi: 10.1177/20552076241310055. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Understanding the "Infodemic" Threat: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic.理解“信息疫情”威胁:以新冠疫情为例的研究
Korean J Fam Med. 2024 Jul;45(4):183-188. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0274. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Assessing How Risk Communication Surveillance Prompts COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Internet Users by Applying the Situational Theory of Problem Solving: Cross-Sectional Study.应用问题解决情境理论评估风险沟通监测如何促使互联网用户接受新冠疫苗:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 26;7:e43628. doi: 10.2196/43628.
6
Effect of religious fatalism and concern about new variants on the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.宗教宿命论和对新变种的担忧对新冠疫苗接种接受度的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;14:1071543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1071543. eCollection 2023.
Contextualized impacts of an infodemic on vaccine hesitancy: The moderating role of socioeconomic and cultural factors.
信息疫情对疫苗犹豫的情境化影响:社会经济和文化因素的调节作用。
Inf Process Manag. 2022 Sep;59(5):103013. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103013. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Infodemic and fake news - A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: A scoping review.信息疫情与虚假新闻——2021年新冠疫情期间其全球影响的全面概述:一项范围综述
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Aug;78:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Impact of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Social Media Virality: Content Analysis of Message Themes and Writing Strategies.社交媒体上 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的传播影响:信息主题和写作策略的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e37806. doi: 10.2196/37806.
6
Psycho-behavioural factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Korean adults: The moderating role of age.影响韩国成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的心理行为因素:年龄的调节作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Sep;78(9):2904-2915. doi: 10.1111/jan.15273. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review.老年人在线健康信息搜索行为:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 16;24(2):e34790. doi: 10.2196/34790.
8
Immunity debt or vaccination crisis? A multi-method evidence on vaccine acceptance and media framing for emerging COVID-19 variants.免疫债务还是疫苗危机?关于新兴 COVID-19 变体的疫苗接受度和媒体框架的多方法证据。
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 15;40(12):1855-1863. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.055. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
Stratified Impacts of the Infodemic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey in 6 Asian Jurisdictions.分层影响的信息疫情在 COVID-19 大流行期间:横断面调查在 6 个亚洲司法管辖区。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 22;24(3):e31088. doi: 10.2196/31088.
10
A Deadly Infodemic: Social Media and the Power of COVID-19 Misinformation.致命的信息疫情:社交媒体与新冠病毒错误信息的力量。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e35552. doi: 10.2196/35552.