Fassauer H M, Fassauer I, Ilgner B, Kötzschke H, Schröter C
Stomatol DDR. 1978 Oct;28(10):700-8.
The therapeutical results obtained with oral irrigations when O2 or CO2 was used as a propellant air compared with those achieved with compressed air. The assessment of the therapeutical success was based on the periodontal disease index according to Kötzschke and the exsudate heights according to Egelberg. A significant improvement in the periodontal condition was stated in all three groups of patients. Though only the exsudate values for the O2 group were significantly better than those for the compressed air group, being the only difference between the groups which was significant, the greater efficiency of the O2 and CO2 application (compared to compressed air application) is, nevertheless, obvious and interpretable. The therapeutical results obtained permit the statement that a technically perfect device and the further increase of the partial pressure of O2 or CO2 in the irrigation fluid will lead to even better therapeutical results, for which purpose the suggestions given should be considered in establishing the indication. The favourable results achieved with compressed air testify to the beneficial action of each irrigation or spray treatment.
将氧气或二氧化碳用作推进气体进行口腔冲洗时所获得的治疗效果，与使用压缩空气时所取得的效果进行了比较。治疗成功的评估基于Kötzschke的牙周疾病指数以及Egelberg的渗出液高度。所有三组患者的牙周状况均有显著改善。虽然只有氧气组的渗出液值显著优于压缩空气组，这是各组之间唯一显著的差异，但氧气和二氧化碳应用（与压缩空气应用相比）的更高效率仍然是明显且可解释的。所获得的治疗结果表明，技术上完美的设备以及冲洗液中氧气或二氧化碳分压的进一步提高将带来更好的治疗效果，为此在确定适应症时应考虑所给出的建议。使用压缩空气所取得的良好结果证明了每次冲洗或喷雾治疗的有益作用。
