Reece W O, Hotchkiss D K
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.
J Dairy Sci. 1987 Aug;70(8):1601-11. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80188-1.
Three methods of feeding calves were compared as follows: 1) milk replacer only with restricted movement, 2) milk replacer only with freedom of movement, and 3) hay, grain, and water with freedom of movement. No significant differences were noted for variables of acid-base balance (sampled while resting). An Fe deficiency, microcytic, hypochromic anemia, developed in the calves receiving milk replacer only. Average daily gain, carcass grade, and sale price were superior for calves receiving only milk replacer with freedom of movement as compared with those with restricted movement. A fourth method (calves nursing cows), represented by calves having a different origin, was compared as a supplemental group. Absolute numbers for lymphocyte and neutrophils were significantly higher for calves nursing cows than for calves reared by the other methods.
1)仅使用代乳粉且活动受限;2)仅使用代乳粉且活动自由;3)干草、谷物和水且活动自由。(在犊牛休息时取样)酸碱平衡变量方面未发现显著差异。仅接受代乳粉喂养的犊牛出现了缺铁性小细胞低色素性贫血。与活动受限的犊牛相比,仅接受代乳粉且活动自由的犊牛平均日增重、胴体等级和售价更高。作为补充组,对第四种方法(犊牛哺乳母牛)进行了比较,该组犊牛来源不同。哺乳母牛的犊牛淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞的绝对数量显著高于采用其他方法饲养的犊牛。